Live data from Hacker News

Finland’s Green Party endorses nuclear power

allianceforscience.cornell.edu

191–200 of 306 posts

Re: Finland’s Green Party endorses nuclear power

#191

This is great, and hopefully it will stop the premature shutdown of existing nuclear reactors. But it's pretty tiny climate news overall. Nuclear reactors are aging out and nobody in Western Europe or the US seems to know how to build in a cost competitive way anymore. Deploying 5GW of solar and storage, or 3-4GW of wind, is far easier, faster, and cheaper than trying to build a new reactor, which won't come on line…

> 5GW of solar [in Finland] Okay I'm afraid that's it for me. Being on a discussion board that has to debate "is deploying solar in Finland a good idea?" is not worth it. Incidentally, yes, it took Finland 10 years to build their last reactor. They commissioned it a week or so ago, mere days before Russia disconnected them. Literally nothing we can effectively do to mitigate climate change takes <5 any more, includin…

You understand that parts of Finland get 24-hour sunlight all summer long?

Re: Finland’s Green Party endorses nuclear power

#192
post #162

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Storage will be built when it makes sense to build storage. For storage to be useful, you need enought renewables to charge it from.

How? Magic ? I will buy solar panel for my home now and disconnect from the grid if you are capable provide me with a storage product that makes sense. AFAIK there are no batteries that are safe and make economical sense today and I have no clue what you storage thing you allude too that can be built in 1 year (very convenient of you not to mention what exactly it is you think that storage is that will appear this ye…

The topic is utility-scale storage.

For your house, batteries is currently your best alternative. New battery tech is coming online which may turn out to scale down to single home use. Or may not. But even lithium storage gets cheaper every year.

The right mix of storage technologies will very widely according to where it serves.

Re: Finland’s Green Party endorses nuclear power

#193

If the Greens in England and Wales dropped their opposition to nuclear and also binned off a few of their more anti-egalitarian positions (I cannot in good faith support criminal sentencing where a man goes to jail but a woman doesn't for the same crime for example) and I'd probably vote for them at this point. They've only recently been seen as a 'serious' party with mainstream appeal but climate change doesn't real…

Given that no party accurately matches 100% of your policies and that they’re unlikely to achieve a majority and force through the less-palatable-to-you policies (regardless of what they are) it’s probably best to vote based on the critically important issues, which currently is pretty much the climate crisis.

I'm aware of this, but egalitarianism is a core value of mine that I won't compromise on even if it's in an unusual direction.

Re: Finland’s Green Party endorses nuclear power

#194
post #163

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Macron announced[1][2][3] plans to build 14 new reactors. [1] https://www.cnn.com/2022/02/11/business/nuclear-power-france... [2] https://www.nytimes.com/2022/02/10/world/europe/france-macro... [3] https://www.theguardian.com/world/2022/feb/10/france-to-buil...

None of the money spent on cancelled reactors is ever given back. And, they will all be cancelled, so all that is unknown is how much money will turn out to have been diverted from renewables, first.

Will giving this money to built up solar and extract the needed neodyme/copper increase the worldwide deployment of solar and wind, or are the mines already running at close to max capacity anyway and new developments are stalled by a lack of workforce, administrative decisions, or environmentalists?

If the response is 2, what's the real issue?

Re: Finland’s Green Party endorses nuclear power

#195

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Germany derives 25% of its energy consumption from natural gas. In order to remove this, they'll need to replace it with something. If they want to replace it with renewable energy, then they'll need storage. In no universe can they simply swap 25% of their energy consumption within a year without additional infrastructure.

> Germany derives 25% of its power consumption from natural gas. It's been barely over 10% in 2021. -10% from the previous year. Please stop spreading lies anybody can google up in seconds: https://strom-report.de/download/strommix-2021-deutschland/ > If they want to replace it with renewable energy, then they'll need storage. They obviously don't because it took them one year to get rid of 10% of it already. Without…

This source says that natural gas was 25% of Germany's energy consumption: https://www.cleanenergywire.org/factsheets/germanys-energy-c...

Your link only covers electricity generation, which is only a part of total energy consumption.

Re: Finland’s Green Party endorses nuclear power

#196
post #162

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Storage will be built when it makes sense to build storage. For storage to be useful, you need enought renewables to charge it from.

How? Magic ? I will buy solar panel for my home now and disconnect from the grid if you are capable provide me with a storage product that makes sense. AFAIK there are no batteries that are safe and make economical sense today and I have no clue what you storage thing you allude too that can be built in 1 year (very convenient of you not to mention what exactly it is you think that storage is that will appear this ye…

For home use, the Tesla Powerwall is popular. https://www.tesla.com/powerwall. It gets expensive if you want to ride out several cloudy days in a row.

It's inefficient to have off-grid battery systems for every home. If you can average supply and demand across an entire grid, you need much less storage per person. And you can use storage systems with higher fixed cost but lower cost per kWh, like pumped hydroelectric.

Re: Finland’s Green Party endorses nuclear power

#197
post #38

If the Greens in England and Wales dropped their opposition to nuclear and also binned off a few of their more anti-egalitarian positions (I cannot in good faith support criminal sentencing where a man goes to jail but a woman doesn't for the same crime for example) and I'd probably vote for them at this point. They've only recently been seen as a 'serious' party with mainstream appeal but climate change doesn't real…

> a few of their more anti-egalitarian positions (I cannot in good faith support criminal sentencing where a man goes to jail but a woman doesn't for the same crime for example) That's nuts, haven't heard that before (not that I'm a supporter or anything), any more info on that - what crime for example? Searching not turning up much, since it's being sued for the opposite sexism at the moment; grepping https://policy…

Yeah that's what I'm on about. I don't like how it sets up gendered sentencing guidelines at all let alone doing so in a way that doesn't create any practical benefit by being gendered. The argument could just as easily be made in a non-sexist way by applying it to all non-violent offenders and to be honest I'd probably agree with it. Do they think that children can shrug off a father in prison like it's nothing?

The idea that under the Greens I'd be sent to prison for the configuration of my genitals rather than the severity of my crime is just abhorrent, in the same way I think the way women are often ignored and mistreated by the justice system is abhorrent. It's a real shame because I'd really like to vote for them, but it would mean compromising my core value that everybody should be equal under the law. We did not become a secular society only to immediately burden part of it with original sin again.

Re: Finland’s Green Party endorses nuclear power

#198

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Sure, CO2 removal is much less efficient than point-capture, but if we're talking about using excess power generated at wind and solar installations, we may as well, right? ...Of course, this isn't what you meant. But there will always be better ways to use 'excess' energy than bitcoin's proof-of-access-to-energy-arbitrage scheme.

Also doesn't the Bitcoin network run all the time? Maybe it can average spatially but it can't decide to simplify the problem because less power is available globally.

It would absolutely average globally at the current scale.

Re: Finland’s Green Party endorses nuclear power

#199
post #192

Earlier quoted context omitted.

How? Magic ? I will buy solar panel for my home now and disconnect from the grid if you are capable provide me with a storage product that makes sense. AFAIK there are no batteries that are safe and make economical sense today and I have no clue what you storage thing you allude too that can be built in 1 year (very convenient of you not to mention what exactly it is you think that storage is that will appear this ye…

The topic is utility-scale storage. For your house, batteries is currently your best alternative. New battery tech is coming online which may turn out to scale down to single home use. Or may not. But even lithium storage gets cheaper every year. The right mix of storage technologies will very widely according to where it serves.

>The topic is utility-scale storage.

The topic of this thread is storage that you can have built in 1 year, at max 2. Hydro storage takes a lot more time to be built from scratch.

Re: Finland’s Green Party endorses nuclear power

#200
post #196

Earlier quoted context omitted.

How? Magic ? I will buy solar panel for my home now and disconnect from the grid if you are capable provide me with a storage product that makes sense. AFAIK there are no batteries that are safe and make economical sense today and I have no clue what you storage thing you allude too that can be built in 1 year (very convenient of you not to mention what exactly it is you think that storage is that will appear this ye…

For home use, the Tesla Powerwall is popular. https://www.tesla.com/powerwall . It gets expensive if you want to ride out several cloudy days in a row. It's inefficient to have off-grid battery systems for every home. If you can average supply and demand across an entire grid, you need much less storage per person. And you can use storage systems with higher fixed cost but lower cost per kWh, like pumped hydroelectri…

A grid would need to be huge, because I will have a ton of sun at the same time as my neighbors and we all have darkness at the same time. Wind can compensate partially but you still need a 100% solution and don't want to give up your country energy security and depend hard on others because if bad weather happens then they will not send you energy and keep it for thir own population.
Post reply on HN