So I am seeing more and more of ideas like this; but I feel the need to challenge them a bit. Not the ideal; work less, have more fulfilling lives - I am all in. But all of these initiatives are focused on the wealthier office workers and sometimes factory/shift workers who are non-customer facing. But it totally ignores the service industry which is a huge part of our society (and arguably even more so if we end up…
No matter how much currency you give the poor in society, there won't be an incentive to reward people which provide zero value. Prices will just go up. How much free time you have could very well be a function of how valuable / hard to automate your work is.
You are sort of making my point; proposals like this assume that those who contribute "less" are less valuable - but of course that is only true on one scale.
As a though exercise; if someone is physically disabled to the extent they cannot work and need regular care should they a) live hand to mouth and unable to afford non-essentials? Or b) should they be comfortable and capable of indulging in luxuries.
Currently our society says they have zero value so (a). I argue that it should be (b)