Earlier quoted context omitted.
There's usually a x-year non-compete agreement when this happens... I know a guy that does exactly what you describe, starting a new garbage pickup service every 3 years, when the agreement elapses. He then works for ~3-4 years to build it back up. Sold twice already, and on his third.
Laundromat -> liquor store -> hotel -> retire rich is a common path here. Rinse and repeat a couple times at each point, and because you sell each time to the guy trying to do the same thing behind you instead of to a big competitor, there's never non-compete agreements. Bonus in that the first two are recession proof and cash heavy businesses (if you wish to avail yourself of the possibilities that suggests).
See's Candies is Warren Buffett’s ‘dream’ investment
121–130 of 211 posts
Re: See's Candies is Warren Buffett’s ‘dream’ investment
#122I know I am "supposed" to like Warren Buffett, but frankly I don't; and this does show why I don't. Buffett buys a discretionary, almost a luxury item, store, and jacks up the prices well above the rate of inflation. The owner of LVMH does the same. This is not the same as a company that is advancing technology or building the same item, but for less money. I value the guy who runs the sriracha sauce company higher t…
Value him in what sense? The sriracha guy made a terrible commercial mistake. The capitalist in me doesn't value a person who does that and I would hesitate investing in a venture he did over, say, Warren Buffet (hypothetically speaking of course).
People "like" Warren Buffett because he's the ultimate capitalist. Also...
If you value the sriracha guy over Buffett in a "altruistic this is better for the consumer" type of way, then sure you could make that case (as the article does), but also remember that Buffett is giving away all (most) of his profits to charity. The utilitarian could argue that Buffett's value is far greater. He's gobbled up all of the profits from various industries (for example luxury goods which provide little benefit to "the little guy") and is reapportioning those profits to charities that may actually save lives (not just dress up your rice). I don't know, I'm not arguing for Buffett personally, but there's more than whats on the surface.
Re: See's Candies is Warren Buffett’s ‘dream’ investment
#123Earlier quoted context omitted.
while that may be true (and better then nothing), you still have to rely on companies like I said originally
You always have to rely on somebody if you don't do it yourself.
Re: See's Candies is Warren Buffett’s ‘dream’ investment
#124> Buffett cautioned Huggins to never sacrifice quality for profit. Funny how that's the complete opposite of another celebrated investor: Jorge Paulo Leman from Brazil's 3G Capital Partners (Heinz, Popeye's, Anheuser-Busch, Tim Horton's, Bugger King, etc). Their game is to buy brands with very strong customer loyalty and slash costs (and quality). In the long run they'll destroy the brand but until then will make eno…
What that company did to Tim Horton’s was basically an act of war against Canada.
Re: See's Candies is Warren Buffett’s ‘dream’ investment
#125My late grandmother loved Sees candies, and I frequently gave her a box for Christmas every year. Personally I always thought they were expensive and not as good as some of the artisanal chocolate you can find these days; like a product for older generations with older tastes. And then I discovered their lollipops and little pops - both chocolate and butterscotch. They're uniquely good as hard candies, and I've never…
Re: See's Candies is Warren Buffett’s ‘dream’ investment
#126It's the slow and steady increase in prices that made it so profitable. About 5x over inflation during Buffett ownership. This has happened to far too many items over the last few decades. Most of the things drugstores sell are cheap to make, but have steadily increased in price in the US over the last few decades. Vitamins used to be priced according to manufacturing cost. Slowly, the low-cost vitamins have been up-…
Re: See's Candies is Warren Buffett’s ‘dream’ investment
#127I know I am "supposed" to like Warren Buffett, but frankly I don't; and this does show why I don't. Buffett buys a discretionary, almost a luxury item, store, and jacks up the prices well above the rate of inflation. The owner of LVMH does the same. This is not the same as a company that is advancing technology or building the same item, but for less money. I value the guy who runs the sriracha sauce company higher t…
> I value the guy who runs the sriracha sauce company higher than Buffett: Value him in what sense? The sriracha guy made a terrible commercial mistake. The capitalist in me doesn't value a person who does that and I would hesitate investing in a venture he did over, say, Warren Buffet (hypothetically speaking of course). People "like" Warren Buffett because he's the ultimate capitalist. Also... If you value the srir…
If the sriracha guy is letting people keep their own money, that is decidedly utilitarian also...
Re: See's Candies is Warren Buffett’s ‘dream’ investment
#128Buffett's MO for subsidiaries is businesses that generate low cost free cash flow that can be leveraged to fund more speculative paper investments. It's very similar to the conglomerate model - arranging for an internal cost of capital lower than you can get on the open market, to fund capital intensive longer term projects. Interestingly Berkshire has never tried to develop any "synergies" whatsoever between its bus…
BRK noticeably avoids debt, prefers all cash deals and keeps a very strong pile of cash laying around just in case.
Re: See's Candies is Warren Buffett’s ‘dream’ investment
#129Re: See's Candies is Warren Buffett’s ‘dream’ investment
#130Earlier quoted context omitted.
There is no regulation in supplement selling, except for food safety. You can sell sugar branded as Vitamin C, and if your customers aren't going to sue you for false advertising or something, you won't have any problems. The prelegeri really is retail capture.
> prelegeri Sorry, I’m having trouble tracking down this term. Could you tell me what it means or what it means in this context?
I wanted to say "the problem is retail capture", but somehow it filled in a Romanian word instead... Phone keyboards...
Just for completeness, "prelegeri" would be best translated as "lectures" - it made no sense at all in context, it only happened to match a few letters of what I fat-fingered.