Live data from Hacker News

Twitter CEO fires two top executives, freezes hiring

theverge.com

961–970 of 1000 posts

Re: Twitter CEO fires two top executives, freezes hiring

#961
post #845

Earlier quoted context omitted.

If your salary was $25k/year (a respectable amount for the majority of world population), would $1M seem like a lifetime financial stability? I think so. Yet if your salary is $250k/year, it probably wouldn't, and this would sound ridiculous to people who make $25k/year. If you make 25k/year getting 1M is almost as good as getting 42M, because you are not used to thinking about anything you can do with 42M that you c…

Most people on $250k are just trying to “survive” (as in, have a house and a family) in a high cost-of-living area. If a house costs $2M then $250k is only just sufficient after deducting taxes and living expenses. Their spending is not so different from someone earning $25k in a low cost-of-living area. There’s nowhere in the world where the cost of living requires $10M/year. To spend that much money you are forced…

Financial freedom is supposed to cover more than just some standard "cost of living" in a given area. It should let you maintain your lifestyle without having to work for it. Maintaining the lifestyle includes keeping your spending habits, so if you have been spending 10M/year, then achieving financial freedom would mean you can keep spending that much for the rest of your life.

It's a different question how many people actually spend 10M/year - I have no data about that, but I can easily see myself spending that much if my income has been 40M/year for several years. To me personally spending that money would not necessarily mean buying some high-end luxuries. It would probably involve trying to make some changes in the world and influence things. But yes, luxuries and interesting experiences too. If you're interested in this question, try finding more information about lives of famous rich people.

Re: Twitter CEO fires two top executives, freezes hiring

#962

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Hmm, are we on the same HN? I feel like I see a lot of topics debated I’d call political (“about how society ought to function”) on a daily basis.

I was going to say.... HN is full of politics. Not always the Red vs Blue kind, but there's political discussions constantly . At any given time several front page stories are explicitly political, and several more are implicitly political (e.g. cryptocurrency).

Richard Stallman once said that "geeks like to think they can ignore politics, you can leave politics alone, but politics won't leave you alone." When people imply that there is such a thing as an a-political take on the world we live in, what they're saying is that they cant identify the mainstream ideology that they themselves are adherents of. As such things which adhere to it look "natural", without "bias", or "non-political."

Re: Twitter CEO fires two top executives, freezes hiring

#963

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It is 100% hate speech to call all LGBTQ people groomers, to imply ones sexuality is because they were groomed. It's hateful and a disingenuous political argument to use that cast that term on anyone who objects to DeSantis' banning of discussions of LGBTQ topics. Which is why we are discussing this. Not knowing that is triggering is gross. If you have certain distasteful beliefs, at least have the respect not to say…

>It is 100% hate speech to call all LGBTQ people groomers, to imply ones sexuality is because they were groomed. Literally no one said this. Maybe you need to think about where you perceive this to be coming from.

This isn't perception. it is the reality and factual that a large amount of people / politicians on the right are saying this exact slur. re their counter response to critique of FL and TX laws, and book bannings across the country.

You should see the comments we get on FB. I run ads for political campaigns. It's insanely effective how much this has seeped into that electorate. And very very sad.

Re: Twitter CEO fires two top executives, freezes hiring

#964

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> There are competitive cars vs tesla for electric It is my belief that those "competitive cars" wouldn't have happened if it hadn't been for Tesla.

MySpace, BlackBerry come to mind. At least those were new markets. At the end of the day you can't explain love and people love Elon Musk. Guys from all over the world are in a sort weird parasocial relationship with the guy. That never happened with the CEO of MySpace and BlackBerry

I feel like the growth of people that bash him is higher than people that worship him. In any case there is a parasocial component to it indeed.

Re: Twitter CEO fires two top executives, freezes hiring

#965

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Or you have a higher tolerance for negativity and hate than I do.

Good point. Although, I don't think it's the case: mine's essentially zero. Don't misunderstand: I've seen that stuff on Twitter. I've reported a few people. And political topics and other controversial topics are absolutely rife with it. I do not excuse it in any way. I just find it easy to avoid?

You've just described how you haven't avoided it, but instead have actively engaged with it by availing yourself of moderation tools.

It leads me to suppose that you're underestimating how much you're exposed to that you find disquieting.

Re: Twitter CEO fires two top executives, freezes hiring

#966
post #846

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I am not an expert in cars and yet I know the Renault Zoe was commercialized in 2012, the year of the model S, for a reasonable autonomy and a much, much cheaper price. I believe tesla were the first to sell low volume, pricey EV cars. Their range and timing advance is only because of choosing the rich over the middle class, aka a lesser impact. Although it's true EV were and remain not cheap but it's getting quickly…

Didn't the Zoe have a 22kwh battery? I don't doubt that it was practical for some things, but that was exactly the kind of car that many (especially in the US) used as an example of the "impracticality" of electric back then.

it had a 210km range for the first iteration and 1/3 of the model s https://www.renaultgroup.com/en/news-on-air/news/renault-zoe...

Re: Twitter CEO fires two top executives, freezes hiring

#967
post #922

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The Leaf that Nissan sold while the Model S was Tesla’s only sedan (ie 2012-2017) was not an ICE-equivalent vehicle. It was explicitly a city vehicle with a If “high-performance” means “can handle the daily driving needs of > 50% of the population” then I guess you’re right, Tesla only created that market.

The daily-driving needs of 95% of the population are incompatible with a 100k$ car. The Leaf fit the needs of more people simply by virtue of having an acceptable price. The Zoe also had a 150km+ effective range, which is more than enough for most people (maybe less so for Americans).

zoe was 210km and very cheap, it's mystery why it didn't took off

Re: Twitter CEO fires two top executives, freezes hiring

#968
post #633
post #266

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It still confuses me that being part-owner of an old dot-com payment company, part-owner of a mid-sized car company (by number of cars sold), and part-owner of a (very good) rocket company make a person richer than anyone has ever been in the history of the planet, but that's probably because I just haven't looked into it enough.

Elon Musk is nowhere near the richest person in history. Augustus Caesar and Mansa Musa IX were multi-trillionaires in comparative spending power.

there is a great wikipedia page for this

Re: Twitter CEO fires two top executives, freezes hiring

#969

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I used to work in car sales in the bay area. Basically every car salesman and every mechanic at a franchise car dealership owns a home. Maybe they drive 30-75 minutes to work, but they are 25-35 and own a home in California. The older ones own a home within 15 minutes of their job.

That they bought themselves? What's the cheapest home available within an Hour of SF, 500k or more? Do you really think a car salesman barely pushing 100k a year can swing that? Or are you implying that car salesman in the Bay are making top 1% salaries?

I wasn't talking about car salesman that work in SF proper. Yes, 1 hour from there is basically still pretty expensive. But if you can work anywhere 30 minutes outside SF, and then live another 45 further, you own a home. And yes any decent car salesperson is making $100k. I made on average $250k but I was a bit better than top 1%, and I know a few that made more. I suppose you could say I only socialize with high performers. Sure every car dealer also has a few people that struggle to pay their apartment rent. The industry is setup for an good salesperson to support a family. If you can outperform average by 2x, which is possible if you're really on it, you can make 2x+ that amount. Same applies to mechanics that are good at their craft.

Re: Twitter CEO fires two top executives, freezes hiring

#970

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The daily-driving needs of 95% of the population are incompatible with a 100k$ car. The Leaf fit the needs of more people simply by virtue of having an acceptable price. The Zoe also had a 150km+ effective range, which is more than enough for most people (maybe less so for Americans).

zoe was 210km and very cheap, it's mystery why it didn't took off

The Model S was the first EV that “happened to be” an EV. You didn’t have to compromise on range, power, comfort, or anything else to own it. That’s why it succeeded. It was a great car, and happened to be an EV.

Tesla’s chief designer himself: “We are past the idea of an environmentally friendly vehicle needing to look different. People don't want to sacrifice anything, including style, to own an efficient car.”

Post reply on HN