Netflix’s big power clash and rivalries behind the crash

Post by mitchdoogle » Fri, May 06, 2022, 5:55 AM UTC

breadov wrote: post #128

scarface74 wrote: post #121

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> Increasing pop politics seemingly shoe horned into everything I'd turn on People said the same thing in the 60s when Star Trek had the nerve to have a representative crew aboard the Enterprise and when they showed an interracial kiss.

It's different these days though. Much more emphasis on whatever fresh sexual and gender identities happen to be in vogue right now, apparently for no purpose other than to preach about them to the viewer. Whereas in Star Trek, it made sense that a future spacefaring crew would be made up of people with origins from all different parts of the world. This was entirely consistent with the overall storyline.

Post by bitcharmer » Fri, May 06, 2022, 5:56 AM UTC

esrauch wrote: post #169

colinmhayes wrote: post #127

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> Documentaries that were more ideological than interesting I can not stand how every "documentary" on netflix is actually an extremely opinionated political piece or true crime. And I usually agree with the political opinion, it's just incredibly annoying and divisive, and really it mostly feels dishonest.

I feel this is just true for every non-Ken Burns documentary I've ever seen and I find it kind of annoying. They always seem to have some axe to grind and just do anything they can to support that biased thesis with no room for caveats or shades of gray.

Post by mitchdoogle » Fri, May 06, 2022, 6:06 AM UTC

solarhoma wrote: post #189

dillondoyle wrote: post #145

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Gen-z identifies as 20% queer. Each new generation is more willing/able to live their truth. Wouldn't surprise me if we land somewhere around 25-30%. In large part thanks to representation in shows and movies. The us is rapidly diversifying too in terms of race, yet still even more under represented in media. Glaad says only ~10% queer characters on broadcast, and was a decline from previous study. Specifically compa…

Quoted post unavailable.

Post by ido » Fri, May 06, 2022, 6:08 AM UTC

solarhoma wrote: post #175

dillondoyle wrote: post #145

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Gen-z identifies as 20% queer. Each new generation is more willing/able to live their truth. Wouldn't surprise me if we land somewhere around 25-30%. In large part thanks to representation in shows and movies. The us is rapidly diversifying too in terms of race, yet still even more under represented in media. Glaad says only ~10% queer characters on broadcast, and was a decline from previous study. Specifically compa…

Is it truth or is it being force fed down children’s throats? How can the Western world go from a ~2% homosexuality rate to 20% in two generations? It appears we both have a different perspective on how we got here.

Post by asdff » Fri, May 06, 2022, 6:09 AM UTC

qq66 wrote: post #214

ggm wrote: post #119

I'm just here to say how nice the tcp/ip tuning team is. The content may be a battle zone but their internet technology is focussed on tcp optimisations which make sense. They have amazing instrumentation in the kernel, and they give back to FreeBSD. I don't work for them, I have met them. Nice guys.

Netflix had great streaming tech years before anyone else did. I wonder why they decided that the right move was to compete on content. If they had just set up a platform where any content provider could sell their content (on a monthly or one-off basis) for a small cut like 15%, they might have become the default "TV store."