Live data from Hacker News

What game are you playing?

autodidacts.io

111–120 of 197 posts

Re: What game are you playing?

#111

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Indeed, as well as learning to accept that there are some games you'll just never be good at. Personally, I've never been good at playing the political game at work so I don't attempt to. There are times when I can tell it's being played, but maybe not even who exactly is playing, let alone what their strategy is or what a strategy might look like. It seems difficult and not fun at all though, so I'm ok with this ina…

not that the sentiment isn't legitimate but i wonder if your ostensible acceptance of inability is deep down a feeling of superiority for refusing to engage wrapped in mild self deprecation and faux gracious acceptance of a personal shortcoming, the acknowledgement of which is itself mildly performative - a wrapper perhaps palatable to this audience due to familiarity but distasteful to most others

Given that lot of politicking is socially damaging (but promotes interests of a person or a small group), it can be valid to feel good about not engaging in it(maybe not proud) - just like say one might feel good about being honest.

Of course, one can use political skills in a beneficial way(for which purpose it is worth learning). That is rare.

Secondly, being innocent or straightforward is itself a political strategy even if not deployed consciously. This signals that other people can read you directly and hence rely on your words and that you wont backstab etc. Societies which have this level of trustworthiness also tend to flourish.

Re: What game are you playing?

#112
post #110

Playing real life games like "who's first to get a BMW" sucks ass. Sure, you play it hard and you win, and then? You have a shitty car that will eventually break down. I cannot see the point in owning a car other than owning a means of transportation. Owning loads of wealth in general?: Yay claps you did well, now share with the rest of class you stingy pos. Accumulating stuff on your person in any way can make you b…

A few of my friends seem to conspicuously avoid the trappings of material wealth, but constantly work to retire early on a modest budget. They'll play old games on old PCs, watch Netflix, hang out, volunteer, work (but not too hard), and eat cheap food. They've acquired (or are saving for) millions in investments. They would argue that they should put on their own mask before helping those next to them. I don't think of them as selfish, and I'm not sure it's fair to think that way. Maybe stingy, but buying freedom from the wage treadmill to be able to raise a family isn't selfish, they would argue it's an essential freedom many are denied.

If everyone could win that would be amazing, but short of political change what would you suggest I tell them to do? Live frugally and give away all they have? Would actually make any difference at all? For every one of these friends I know of a hundred others who blow every extra dollar on stupid luxuries that are gone instantly. The savers wouldn't be able to raise the standard of living of even a tiny fraction of the spenders.

Re: What game are you playing?

#113

There was a comment on HN about a year ago by somebody that grew up in India, and being Pakistani i relate to it a lot as well. Specifically, it mentioned that these 'games' and people choosing one or two games out of a great number of games available out there seems like a uniquely North American thing (as far as we can tell from our own limited exposure to other societies). So while you folks had the jock, the nerd…

Is it, though? I've never been to India/Pakistan, but just knowing some of the migrants I've met you guys seem to be much the same as us. Some play the status game (first to get a shitty BMW wins), others play the "knowledge" game. Some play the "work your arse off to show how much of a man you are" game, others play the "work as little as possible to show how much of a man you are" game.

i started school in the balkans and came to australia midway through. one of the key things that struck me was the divide between "nerds" and "cool" kids. this divide simply didnt exist where i was from and usually the cool kids were ones that excelled in everything. actually physical fitness is (was?) a huge and very strict part of the school curriculum, starting from primary school. this might however be a remnant of socialism. sport periods in australian schools on the other hand were a joke (bludge subject). moreover i felt that in the balkans kids that performed poorly (in all/any subjects) were generally more prone to get picked on by other kids

edit: however i have to say that i dont think that this is an east/west thing, but possibly an anglosphere issue. in germany i have the feeling that kids have a qualitatively healthier and more rounded relationship to schooling (and eachother) than in australia

Re: What game are you playing?

#114
post #87

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The game I'm playing is "read articles that HN users found interesting, and then see what other HN users had to say about that topic". I guess I can conclude that davidkuennen is playing is some other game. They're probably very good at it, or at least having fun.

Busted. I will use this as a lesson to improve. :-)

No post body was provided.

Re: What game are you playing?

#115
post #42

Earlier quoted context omitted.

You’re being downvoted because you’re coming off as if you’re marketing. It’s okay though. Pixel dungeon is a lot of fun and well written to boot; the source is online

Thanks for the insight. Downvotes aren't a problem, they don't bother me. In fact, they are a useful and welcome signal. SPD is what I've been playing casually for the past few months. It's sort of like Diablo II, on your phone. Without save/restore points, if you die it's over for that character. If you get a vampiric weapon, cherish it :). They're rare.

No post body was provided.

Re: What game are you playing?

#117
post #110

Playing real life games like "who's first to get a BMW" sucks ass. Sure, you play it hard and you win, and then? You have a shitty car that will eventually break down. I cannot see the point in owning a car other than owning a means of transportation. Owning loads of wealth in general?: Yay claps you did well, now share with the rest of class you stingy pos. Accumulating stuff on your person in any way can make you b…

A few of my friends seem to conspicuously avoid the trappings of material wealth, but constantly work to retire early on a modest budget. They'll play old games on old PCs, watch Netflix, hang out, volunteer, work (but not too hard), and eat cheap food. They've acquired (or are saving for) millions in investments. They would argue that they should put on their own mask before helping those next to them. I don't think…

:shrugs:

why should i tell you what to tell your friends? they are your friends, you know their triggers better than I do.

tldr: i dislike the game-playing mentality and advocate more cooperation.

i just see all the idiots running to the ticket booth and treading on the flower beds to not just watch "the game" but to "participate" in it, even though nobody but themself really cares about the outcome of their own personal little game. (so why get tickets if you dont watch the game? why not just do your thing for your own sake?).

i especially despise the get-rich folk while people on the other side of the planet have to get by and live off of the trash sent there by "better off civilizations".

of course every single one of us has only that much leverage in the global game of personal survival, but the idea that we have to win the survival game by our own doing, without the help of others, is global poison. It is easy to win any game when you were born into the winning team, midgame.

you cannot play the get rich game only locally, it should come with a sticker on the box: "this game requires a herd of exploited (not included)"; and you wont be able to play for long if the exploited have equal rights and proximity to you

Re: What game are you playing?

#118
post #69

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> it then makes sense (and is good) for principled people to trust their judgement, even if it makes them an outcast. I don't get this. Being judgemental always seemed immature to me. Being curious and trying to understand why individuals or groups do seemingly irrational things: yes. Being judgemental (or "principled" (is this synonymous?)): no. To me, that was always a sign of someone who hasn't made sense of thems…

The issue here is, that good sounding high minded principle you describe in first paragraph fairly often amounts to enabling. It also puts great emphasis to understanding aggressor and literally none to understanding victim ... which turns into victim blaming and petty scrutiny of victim fairly often. And I don't even have super big issues in mind. It happens in fairly normal abusive/low level corruption situations t…

[deleted]

Re: What game are you playing?

#120

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It's easy for nerds to get respect from other nerds. But I agree with him that nerds get little respect from non-nerds.

You are saying that women don't respect successful men? Because in my world, nerds are successful.

No post body was provided.
Post reply on HN