Earlier quoted context omitted.
That's just untrue. The claim is that there is "really no difference" between discriminating against Blacks and short people. There are several important differences, and they relate directly to the historical treatment of Black people. You are arguing in bad faith, just like the OP.
> You are arguing in bad faith, just like the OP. Can we keep discussion civil? https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html - "Assume good faith." > There are several important differences, Historically. But if the historical context of slavery did not exist, it would still be just as unacceptable to treat Black individuals differently. In essence, historical context is largely irrelevant to whether an action is…
>As such, treating Black individuals differently is not more or less wrong than treating short individuals differently.
Again, as I have mentioned repeatedly, we agree on this point. Where we disagree is in the assertion that there is "no difference" in effect, precisely because of the historical context.