> People simply get bored with how their apps and websites look after six to seven years. They need a change. Is there any research that supports this claim? If I use an app for 6 years, why would I suddenly need a change? I'm still ocassionally using a 10 y/o version of Photoshop. In fact, I'm very happy that it does not change. I wouldn't want to spend time on re-learning the UI. The same is true for many apps that…
Neubrutalism is taking over the web?
81–90 of 204 posts
Re: Neubrutalism is taking over the web?
#82> People simply get bored with how their apps and websites look after six to seven years. They need a change. Is there any research that supports this claim? If I use an app for 6 years, why would I suddenly need a change? I'm still ocassionally using a 10 y/o version of Photoshop. In fact, I'm very happy that it does not change. I wouldn't want to spend time on re-learning the UI. The same is true for many apps that…
Re: Neubrutalism is taking over the web?
#83Real world objects rarely change design because of the costs involved. When they do, the change needs to justify that cost. For example, I'm not going to change the buttons on my microwave because I'm "bored" with them. The costs of changing software design is far less impractical and expensive, and therefore isn't driven by the same high level of justification.
I strongly suspect then, there are two reasons for these design changes we see every couple of years in software:
The first is easy, and most of us probably already agree; designers gotta design. They have to justify their salary _somehow_.
The second is more philosophical. The west — and especially the U.S.A. — looks to alleviate existential crisis with distractions. Shiny new toys keeps us from having to face uncomfortable truths about the nature of reality (if you're not religious).
Re: Neubrutalism is taking over the web?
#84In design that means designers converging on some simple to reproduce esthetic like this, which becomes familiar to users, and then ironically becomes popular because of its familiarity. That is, until a few years pass, and a new fad has to surface.
I'm predicting Art-Deco in web design within 10 years at this pace.
Re: Neubrutalism is taking over the web?
#85> People simply get bored with how their apps and websites look after six to seven years. They need a change. Is there any research that supports this claim? If I use an app for 6 years, why would I suddenly need a change? I'm still ocassionally using a 10 y/o version of Photoshop. In fact, I'm very happy that it does not change. I wouldn't want to spend time on re-learning the UI. The same is true for many apps that…
Re: Neubrutalism is taking over the web?
#86Re: Neubrutalism is taking over the web?
#87> Brutalism is a 1950’s architectural trend that was abandoning all decorations, and creating brutally simple buildings made from concrete. They often weren’t even painted to emphasize their brutal nature. So big, brutal blocks of concrete. The word "brut" came from French "Béton brut" which means "raw concrete" — has nothing with how "brutal" we perceive it to be. There's lots of architecture articles covering this…
* brutal - brutalism
* brut - brutism
Re: Neubrutalism is taking over the web?
#88Re: Neubrutalism is taking over the web?
#89Re: Neubrutalism is taking over the web?
#90> "People simply get bored with how their apps and websites look after six to seven years. They need a change" Real world objects rarely change design because of the costs involved. When they do, the change needs to justify that cost. For example, I'm not going to change the buttons on my microwave because I'm "bored" with them. The costs of changing software design is far less impractical and expensive, and therefor…
What an astonishing claim.
Fashion is too easy, you could maybe wiggle away from clothes not being "objects in the real world" although I assure you the Emperor aside they are exactly that.
How about cars?