Live data from Hacker News

San Francisco cops pull over a Cruise driverless car for no lights on

theverge.com

51–60 of 504 posts

Re: San Francisco cops pull over a Cruise driverless car for no lights on

#51
post #41

Earlier quoted context omitted.

No, as you have cited, there is a law saying vehicles must be equipped with these lights, but it's up to national regulations on when they must be used. See https://trip.studentnews.eu/s/4086/77033-Car-travel-in-Europ... for a list (incomplete, Denmark requires daytime lights.)

Nordic countries are different because even their "days" they sun can be seen 2-3-4 hours.

unless it's summer in which case it can be seen about 19 hours.

Re: San Francisco cops pull over a Cruise driverless car for no lights on

#52
post #25
post #20

Earlier quoted context omitted.

In EU there is a law that you should drive with headlight all time. Old cars drive with low beam, new cars comes with daytime running lights (DRLs). https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Daytime_running_lamp#European_...

The US has this law for motorcycles. Maybe we should apply it to driverless cars as well

Yes, every self-driving car should have a row of LED lights at the front. Also, they should indicate that the AI is actively scanning its environment by switching the LEDs on and off in a regular left-to-right pattern.

Re: San Francisco cops pull over a Cruise driverless car for no lights on

#53
post #21

Earlier quoted context omitted.

"We work closely with the SFPD on how to interact with our vehicles and have a dedicated phone number for them to call in situations like this.” And yes, that seems thoroughly impractical at scale.

The scalable solution would be that law enforcement will be given a direct override/pull-over button for any driverless car. I expect this to happen in the future if driverless cars reach large volumes. Maybe I haven't thought this through enough, but I can't imagine a circumstance where you would want a driverless car to be able to ignore stopping directions from law enforcement.

It's all fun and games until someone else figures out a remote attack on that system.

Re: San Francisco cops pull over a Cruise driverless car for no lights on

#55
post #45

Imagine if every failure in a traditional car became news.

This is relevant, though. There are traffic laws and regulations in place for human drivers and this incident poses a conundrum: how are minor transgressions handled with autonomous vehicles? Who gets fined? The owner? The manufacturer? Do the rules not apply to machines or to a lesser degree and if so, why? Lots of interesting legal questions that are much more relevant in practise than hypothetical (and IMHO comple…

I think it is reasonable that the owner or operating entity gets the fine. Then they can sue the manufacturer or service provider for any issues.

Re: San Francisco cops pull over a Cruise driverless car for no lights on

#56
post #41

Earlier quoted context omitted.

No, as you have cited, there is a law saying vehicles must be equipped with these lights, but it's up to national regulations on when they must be used. See https://trip.studentnews.eu/s/4086/77033-Car-travel-in-Europ... for a list (incomplete, Denmark requires daytime lights.)

Nordic countries are different because even their "days" they sun can be seen 2-3-4 hours.

During winter at mid-day my lights automatically turned on... Just in simple overcast weather. So it does get bit gloomy at times.

Re: San Francisco cops pull over a Cruise driverless car for no lights on

#57
post #21

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The scalable solution would be that law enforcement will be given a direct override/pull-over button for any driverless car. I expect this to happen in the future if driverless cars reach large volumes. Maybe I haven't thought this through enough, but I can't imagine a circumstance where you would want a driverless car to be able to ignore stopping directions from law enforcement.

> I can't imagine a circumstance where you would want a driverless car to be able to ignore stopping directions from law enforcement. Funny, I can't imagine a circumstance where I would want "law enforcement" to be able to override my directions and take control of my car.

Also, we're talking about driverless cars. The scenario is not the police pressing a remote stop button to override your directions, it's to override Cruise/Waymo/Uber's AI or remote control.

This is a serious question, is there some real scenario that hasn't occurred to me, where it's desirable for either Cruise/Waymo/Uber's remote control or the onboard AI to ignore stopping directives from the police?

Re: San Francisco cops pull over a Cruise driverless car for no lights on

#58
post #26
post #15

I find the explanation offered by Cruise amusing: the car supposedly "figured out" that it is in a dangerous spot to be pulled over and "tried to move to a better one" (extremely complex behavior), while the actual reason for the car being pulled over was not having its headlights on (seemingly a relatively simple bug).

If a person did this they'd probably be in some serious trouble

Not necessarily, if you make your intentions clear, e.g. by slowing down and putting your hazards on.

Re: San Francisco cops pull over a Cruise driverless car for no lights on

#59

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I assume it's more complex that that, but I can't see how a driverless car can reliable distinguish between being pulled over and an emergency vehicle is trying to get past on a narrow road.

It might not, but the behaviour would be the same, so the effect is achieved.

No, because on a narrow road, coming to a stop blocks the vehicle behind you.

Re: San Francisco cops pull over a Cruise driverless car for no lights on

#60
post #31

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> I can't imagine a circumstance where you would want a driverless car to be able to ignore stopping directions from law enforcement. Funny, I can't imagine a circumstance where I would want "law enforcement" to be able to override my directions and take control of my car.

Ok, I'm guessing you're American. I've read that the relationship between the police and the public can be a bit .. antagonistic. And I know that fugitives are disproportionately romanticized in fiction. But police officers giving you stopping directions are already overriding your directions and taking control of your car, fully backed by law and and force if necessary. Only with a very inefficient implementation.

And, like guns, only the police will ever use this weapon and only for the purposes of public good.
Post reply on HN