Is there any point in using antivirus these days anyway? I'm open to being wrong here, but I'm under the impression that antivirus exists only to tick boxes in outdated security compliance checklists. How big of a threat are viruses compared to, say, rogue antivirus products themselves?
Kaspersky is declared a US national security threat and is banned by the FCC
381–390 of 435 posts
Re: Kaspersky is declared a US national security threat and is banned by the FCC
#382Re: Kaspersky is declared a US national security threat and is banned by the FCC
#383Earlier quoted context omitted.
Which is the entire point of their argument? The Russian government is objectively worse by any honest metric.
> The Russian government is objectively worse by any honest metric. Any metric you and I would like to use, yes. The govt of Saudi Arabia, which is an ally of ours, murders journalists with a chainsaw on a foreign soil and smuggles the body out of the host country in suitcases - yet no Saudi company is penalized. Supporting a proxy war in Yemen is not that different from Russian invasion, but somehow it suffers no co…
Re: Kaspersky is declared a US national security threat and is banned by the FCC
#384Ok, let's cut the crap. Is Kaspersky a dirtbag or not? I suspect not, but it is an unfortunate accident he was born in and runs his company from Russia, the government of which is a dirtbag, so, correct me if I am wrong, Kaspersky must be a dirtbag by association, but especially for discovering Stuxnet. Believable, but I think the real reasons Kaspersky is persona non grata is due to having discovered Stuxnet, and Ka…
Re: Kaspersky is declared a US national security threat and is banned by the FCC
#385Earlier quoted context omitted.
That's funny as the thread is about contrasting Russia with US, but I don't seen to recall US invading any neighboring countries under the false pretense of defending some minorities.
I remember a woman testifying that they were killing babies in Kuwait, and she was later discovered as being the daughter of an ambassador. Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nayirah_testimony I remember the late Colin Powell brandishing proof of WMD in Iraq at the UN Counsel. He will never land in the TPI, neither will the UN Counsel for basing a judgment upon unverified allegation causing dozens of thousands of…
Re: Kaspersky is declared a US national security threat and is banned by the FCC
#386Earlier quoted context omitted.
I, as non-US citizen, thus having sub-human rights in eyes of every US 3-letter agency, still prefer very much US approach to, well, practically any matter compared to Russian one. For Russians, they really don't like anybody else. All that slavic closeness is crap as we can see in Ukraine and elsewhere. Heck, they don't care about other Russians neither, just a cannon fodder and poor fuckers to exploit and then thro…
It would help US to condemn Colin Powell for brandishing supposed proof of WMD at the UN Counsel in 2003, which they never found after invasion. It would help for the US to stop Predator attacks. Most of the world is convinced that they are illegal and illegitimate. And as a French person, I preferred Trump, because he didn’t trigger any new war and he calmed down Little Rocket Man. He even shook his hand! And donate…
Re: Kaspersky is declared a US national security threat and is banned by the FCC
#387Earlier quoted context omitted.
Shouldnt i have the same concerns with software from the US? You dont really have to nationalize to force devs to push malicious code (looking at you Australia)
This kind of comment isn't my favorite, but I do understand where you're coming from. I personally think that it's better the devil you know than the devil you don't. I'm American. My country is the US. Yes, they're spying on me. Yes, they do naughty things. But I assume that at the end of the day, the US has my interests at heart more than China does. Or the UK, or Russia, or Turkey, or anyone else. I happen to live…
I'd much prefer misdeeds that don't affect me from a government that doesn't care about me, than those of a local government who wants to keep me alive for the purposes of doing more bad things to me in the future
Re: Kaspersky is declared a US national security threat and is banned by the FCC
#388Is there any point in using antivirus these days anyway? I'm open to being wrong here, but I'm under the impression that antivirus exists only to tick boxes in outdated security compliance checklists. How big of a threat are viruses compared to, say, rogue antivirus products themselves?
Re: Kaspersky is declared a US national security threat and is banned by the FCC
#389Ok, let's cut the crap. Is Kaspersky a dirtbag or not? I suspect not, but it is an unfortunate accident he was born in and runs his company from Russia, the government of which is a dirtbag, so, correct me if I am wrong, Kaspersky must be a dirtbag by association, but especially for discovering Stuxnet. Believable, but I think the real reasons Kaspersky is persona non grata is due to having discovered Stuxnet, and Ka…
Kaspersky graduated from The Technical Faculty of the KGB Higher School in 1987. That was a definition of a dirtbag in Soviet time.
Re: Kaspersky is declared a US national security threat and is banned by the FCC
#390In the new version a super AI computer is ready to launch a massive automated cyber war. While trying to get the 16 digit “launch” code it runs thousands of simulated scenarios. As things look dire, the hero has the machine play tick-tac-toe with itself…
Just before launching the attack it learns: The only way to win is not to play.
Seriously. What the hell is the world devolving into?
Here’s what I think an alien species watching earth from distant orbit would think: The people are OK. Their so-called leaders are insane. Every single war was started by their leaders. How odd.