Live data from Hacker News

Kaspersky is declared a US national security threat and is banned by the FCC

hothardware.com

151–160 of 435 posts

Re: Kaspersky is declared a US national security threat and is banned by the FCC

#151
At work we are required to have EDR software by our accounting firm (accounts inserting themselves into IT is annoying). We were running Kaspersky as well until this happened though we were already unhappy with it so no loss.

Anyway it made me think: is there a way to roll your own EDR for Windows/Linux/BSD? Basically, can we do EDR without the EDR software?

Re: Kaspersky is declared a US national security threat and is banned by the FCC

#152

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I would really hope my organization doesn't start blanket banning excel macros for "security". It'll be a huge blow to productivity for several.

Draconian bans probably aren't the best way to achieve it, but if it's productivity your org wants they should concentrate on migrating those workflows out of Excel ASAP.

So which accountant is going to be programming your node.js files?

There's a reason companies use excel.

Re: Kaspersky is declared a US national security threat and is banned by the FCC

#153

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The problem is: how do you run a business that has offices and physical assets in Russia, without being at least partially beholden to the Russian government? They have demonstrated that they are not shy about using gangster tactics. One could say that the same is true in the US, but I believe the degree matters. Although the US government and intelligence agencies will and do try to overreach, there is a strong lega…

Quoted post unavailable.

Which is the entire point of their argument? The Russian government is objectively worse by any honest metric.

Re: Kaspersky is declared a US national security threat and is banned by the FCC

#154

Is there any point in using antivirus these days anyway? I'm open to being wrong here, but I'm under the impression that antivirus exists only to tick boxes in outdated security compliance checklists. How big of a threat are viruses compared to, say, rogue antivirus products themselves?

Our bog-standard business ultrabooks have been requested to perform a full disk scan each Friday. Which means their CPUs and Fans are running solid, most all Fridays. I'm CERTAIN there are massive hidden costs in fan replacement and Laptop repairs and nothing useful discovered as a result.

I wonder how much unnecessary AV scans across the world contribute to carbon emissions? I bet it's not insignificant, full CPU and disk access!

Re: Kaspersky is declared a US national security threat and is banned by the FCC

#155
So... let's say a person still wanted to use an Antivirus product anyways, despite not really trusting them due to reasons like this article here; or anything you can say about Norton, etc, etc.

What would you all suggest? Aside from McAfee, Norton and of course Kaspersky. I'm all ears. Some helpful hints though might be:

1. I don't want it giving me pop-ups constantly to remind me of a sale they are having.

2. It can't interfere with legitimate programs more than once in a blue moon.

3. It has be capable of being run with other security software at the same time without incurring an infraction against #2.

4. It has to cost less than 100$ per year, if there has to be payment at all.

I'm asking this because I need a reliable choice to use when suggesting to my potential customers out there. I have some go to's that I used to use, but with everything the way it is right now; I want some input.

Re: Kaspersky is declared a US national security threat and is banned by the FCC

#156

Earlier quoted context omitted.

As a US citizen you still have some semblance of rights under the constitution that dictate what the government can do.

Snowden's leaks showed that the NSA was simply ignoring the 4th Amendment, and that the secret FISA court was letting the NSA do so. Theoretically, the Constitution protects you. In reality, the intelligence community acts largely in secret, and there's very little preventing them from violating the Bill of Rights. Citizens don't even know what rights they've given up until someone like Snowden spills the beans.

No, Snowden's leaks show DoD lawyers working hard to justify programs under the 4th Amendment. In the fallout of the leaks, all but phone metadata collection passed muster.

Re: Kaspersky is declared a US national security threat and is banned by the FCC

#157

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It’s a thing in big orgs, where macros are enabled in excel and employees can be tricked into opening mail attachments. Windows defender should suffice, but like you said, from a compliance/insurance perspective it may me valuable to say “look, we scanned for signatures according to the latest knowledge of [insert vendor]”. Personally I think that it’s ridiculous that these huge orgs fail to address the actual underl…

I would really hope my organization doesn't start blanket banning excel macros for "security". It'll be a huge blow to productivity for several.

They'd just learn Python. They'd be fine.

Re: Kaspersky is declared a US national security threat and is banned by the FCC

#158
post #2

Telegram is next?

Probably not but McAfee should be added just because it sucks so much.

McAfee uninstallation instructions by John McAfee himself

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UQrAfQMpnZk

Re: Kaspersky is declared a US national security threat and is banned by the FCC

#159

So... let's say a person still wanted to use an Antivirus product anyways, despite not really trusting them due to reasons like this article here; or anything you can say about Norton, etc, etc. What would you all suggest? Aside from McAfee, Norton and of course Kaspersky. I'm all ears. Some helpful hints though might be: 1. I don't want it giving me pop-ups constantly to remind me of a sale they are having. 2. It ca…

At least the business version of F-Secure is not annoying the living daylights out of me, although I have the more onerous securities turned off (like the browser protection).

Re: Kaspersky is declared a US national security threat and is banned by the FCC

#160

So... let's say a person still wanted to use an Antivirus product anyways, despite not really trusting them due to reasons like this article here; or anything you can say about Norton, etc, etc. What would you all suggest? Aside from McAfee, Norton and of course Kaspersky. I'm all ears. Some helpful hints though might be: 1. I don't want it giving me pop-ups constantly to remind me of a sale they are having. 2. It ca…

Windows Defender.

See: https://0ut3r.space/2022/03/06/windows-defender/ and recent discussion on HN: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=30580444

Post reply on HN