But to be honest, isn't it one of the recurring point of people running away from gnome? Haven't they just proceeded going ahead not listening to anyone?
The end of the nice GTK button
41–50 of 666 posts
Re: The end of the nice GTK button
#42What I cannot understand is how Canonical, Red Hat, or some rich SV person hasn’t thrown money at the problem and hired a big wig design firm or person to overhaul it all. Johnny Ive is now even available (if he’d take the project). But even going thru a site like dribbble there are so many amazing designers out there. To me it would be a more impressive portfolio piece for a young designer to properly design GTK/Gnome and put it out there for the world. What is stopping this? It can’t be caring with the history of people sharing their themes. Is it just taste / money?
Re: The end of the nice GTK button
#43Earlier quoted context omitted.
Interesting, I always disliked Windows font rendering and much prefer the was MacOS renders fonts. I couldn’t explain why, but I know many graphic designers who say the same. I guess it’s a matter of taste!
Any font rendering looks amazing on HiDPI panels. Have you ever used macOS on a normal monitor? The text looks worse than anything else.
After a decade of “retina” screens, I’m ruined, I can’t stand the look of anti-aliased fonts, whether Windows, Linux or macOS.
Re: The end of the nice GTK button
#44Earlier quoted context omitted.
Interesting, I always disliked Windows font rendering and much prefer the was MacOS renders fonts. I couldn’t explain why, but I know many graphic designers who say the same. I guess it’s a matter of taste!
Any font rendering looks amazing on HiDPI panels. Have you ever used macOS on a normal monitor? The text looks worse than anything else.
The devs and designers are all using 4k, 5k displays these days. Trying to use modern apps etc. on just "FHD" (1080p) displays is painful.
Re: The end of the nice GTK button
#45Microsoft isn't actually responsible for this nonsense. Metro did get rid of bevels, but it didn't get rid of obvious buttons: they simply turned into trivial colored rectangles.
I'm not entirely sure who "refined" it, but Microsoft did eventually end up copying a bad iteration of their own good idea.
Re: The end of the nice GTK button
#46Windows 2.0 - 3.1: 2D
Windows 95 - 7: 3D
Windows 8 - 10: 2D
MacOS 6 - 7: 2D
MacOS 8 - 10: 3D
MacOS 11: 2D
Re: The end of the nice GTK button
#47I agree 100% with the author, the old GTK button was gorgeous, it will be missed. > I have had to explain to people tons of times that the random word in the UI somewhere in an application is actually a button they can press to invoke an action. This is one of my biggest complaints with the super flat modern designs. Many widgets lost their skeuomorphic depth, which encoded a lot if visual information (the clickabili…
Windows 2.0 - 3.1: 2D
Windows 95 - 7: 3D
Windows 8 - 10: 2D
MacOS 6 - 7: 2D
MacOS 8 - 10: 3D
MacOS 11: 2D
As a side point, I predict Sheriff and Sans-Sheriff fonts to also go into similar phases too though over a longer time scale. We're in a very long Sans-Sheriff phase now but I think Sheriff will be "in" in 20 years.
Re: The end of the nice GTK button
#48Re: The end of the nice GTK button
#49Re: The end of the nice GTK button
#50I agree 100% with the author, the old GTK button was gorgeous, it will be missed. > I have had to explain to people tons of times that the random word in the UI somewhere in an application is actually a button they can press to invoke an action. This is one of my biggest complaints with the super flat modern designs. Many widgets lost their skeuomorphic depth, which encoded a lot if visual information (the clickabili…