Live data from Hacker News

Vimeo: “We are a B2B solution, not the indie version of YouTube.”

ymcinema.com

311–317 of 317 posts

Re: Vimeo: “We are a B2B solution, not the indie version of YouTube.”

#311

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The amount almost doesn't matter (it's definitely on the high side compared to alternatives). They can definitely afford it if they have a reasonable budget. However, how Vimeo has treated them as a paying customer is terrible.

What alternatives have you looked at? It's fair priced imo.

No post body was provided.

Re: Vimeo: “We are a B2B solution, not the indie version of YouTube.”

#312
post #192

FastoCloud can provide video hosting on your servers. it will cost 25$ per month From your side need to have server near with your auditory.

Keep spamming and they will add an auto-ban by FatsoCloud as a keyword.

No post body was provided.

Re: Vimeo: “We are a B2B solution, not the indie version of YouTube.”

#313

2TB egress a month (the quotes figure to be in top 1%) on AWS is ~$200/m. For a full solution charging $300 a month doesn’t seem unreasonable. These ad-supported giants skew peoples idea of cost. They make it harder for others to compete - generating outrage when people compare the relative price to “free”.

AWS prices egress bandwidth at a ridiculous premium. It shouldn't cost a large host anywhere near that.

Re: Vimeo: “We are a B2B solution, not the indie version of YouTube.”

#314
post #289

Earlier quoted context omitted.

"We want you to leave" is a pretty ok thing for them to say. "You have a week to leave" is not. It's sleazy and unprofessional, and it's a signal that it's best for anyone to avoid them in the future.

Depends on the contract in place. If they have a clause allowing termination in weeks time then it's entirely professional.

If they negotiated that clause, yes, it's professional. If they hidden it there, no, it's not.

Re: Vimeo: “We are a B2B solution, not the indie version of YouTube.”

#315
post #310

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Please go ahead. A cousin comment says the economic is against you, and I heartedly agree with that.

my comment has nothing to do with economy. vimeo hasn't been doing anything good for years to gather users. it's just weird that they describe themselves as a movie site just because someone is uploading their amateur movies.

ok you meant about Vimeo being stale for many years, with that I fully agree. They could have easily become the indie creators platform, and the top end of that. I even think they could even have become by now a serious threat to YouTube because creators is what makes the platform in the longer term, mainstream audience follow the elite eventually.

Re: Vimeo: “We are a B2B solution, not the indie version of YouTube.”

#316
post #42

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Bandwidth pricing is always a difficult topic. E.g. one comparison: 2 TB traffic out of AWS CloudFront is $85-120/month (first TB free, per TB cost as listed for the second TB, depending on region), and that's traffic only, no storage, processing, ... Of course AWS traffic is not exactly cheap, but Vimeo is an all-in-one service handling more than just traffic.

But that's CloudFront, one of the most expensive CDNs out there. (And that's before considering customers like Vimeo can get special rates, even 50% off is common) Another example on the opposite end is a host like Hetzner, where you get 20TB of traffic at 10Gb/s uplink for any cloud VM at $5+/month (or any root server at $40+/month). Comparably, AWS EC2 is $0.17/GB IIRC. On another note -- it looks like Vimeo are us…

That Hetzner price doesn't include acceptable peering with Telekom (Germany's largest telco), I can only imagine how bad the international peering will be.

Re: Vimeo: “We are a B2B solution, not the indie version of YouTube.”

#317

Earlier quoted context omitted.

With webtorrent JS, yes.

But it doesn't have the infrastructure to handle different resolution delivery based on connection speed and such, on good connections sure but on unreliable connections it's not the same story.

also: subtitles (human-applied and machine-generated), variable speed, arbitrary skipping around the timeline...
Post reply on HN