Live data from Hacker News

On Being Indispensable

sofuckingagile.com

281–290 of 296 posts

Re: On Being Indispensable

#281
post #62

This also happened to me. I was leading the large project, it was a core system for a financial organization. Because of a fast pace and because of the fast growth and because of the unexperienced management, it was impossible to quickly train and delegate things to the appropriate people. I was often getting a call from the devs, asking for help, and I was like “it works so and so, check the X file and find the Y me…

>1) If you cant align with the decision makers you either have to get used to it or move on. Mostly you have no control on the other peoples’ thoughts. If it’s broken, it’s broken. Period. Don’t prolong your decision.

This times 1000.

Re: On Being Indispensable

#282

Alternate title: How it took OP years to realise their teammates and colleagues deserve agency. No such thing as "indispensable". Very few companies and projects die to a singular departure, you're just not that special kiddo. What's actually happened here is a selfish desire to know things without sharing them. If you learn something new, share it somewhere. "People came to ask the Oracle questions only the Oracle c…

I don't like how you're blaming the author of the article here. My experience is that people, be it from the business or from the Product team or Sales or wherever, are happy to ignore documentation and come directly to the person they see as the knower. You can document all you like, they will still come to you and you are the bad guy if you don't answer them and point them to the wiki.

Do some people exist who don't share their knowledge? Definitely. In fact they are rewarded in many cases because they get whatever they want (usually outside of a higher salary)

However, author wouldn't be writing an article like this if he was happy in that position.

Re: On Being Indispensable

#283
post #271

Earlier quoted context omitted.

reversedly, I was at a company where I kept focusing on 'stuff', trying to respond on time, hit deadlines, etc. Went to lunch with someone and he kept saying "chill out, don't sweat it". We were late back from lunch. It bothered me, but not him. I found out a few months later he was dating the niece of the dept manager. The two of them were friends with another lead on the floor. This is why he was always 'chill' abo…

Maybe he was in because he was pleasant to work with and not stressed all the time? I've seen new busybodies like you (maybe) and no one wants to be around them.

being given deadlines ("get XYZ done by march 1")... i take that as... "this needs to be done by march 1". This was very much more towards 'nepotism' than "oh he's just so pleasant".

Colleague (new, like me) was given task of "build web software feature X for the marketing team, and you have to ensure colleague B is trained". Colleague B ... did not understand browser technology or server vs client stuff (literally - 'how do you upload a file?' and 'how do you submit form data'?). Colleague tells boss "I can work on training B, or get feature done, but can't do both by the deadline in 2 weeks". "That's your problem, get it done". Feature was done, but marketing team didn't want it ("why did you build this?"), and B wasn't 'trained', and this reflected very very negatively on my colleague. The 'chill' guy? Regularly missed deadlines and delivered buggy stuff. But hey... he's chill, so everything must be cool, right?

If you have loose deadlines... just say "this is a loose deadline".

Unsure how doing work you were assigned is being a 'busy body', but hey, you were there, and I wasn't, right?

This is also a place where the tech leads in charge kept pronouncing that HTML tables were "depreciated" and we should build all tabular data in divs only. In 2004. As in "transform these dozens of Excel spreadsheet data in to something that looks like a table, but... hey you can't use tables, because they're depreciated". If you can't even use the word correctly... I'm not sure I can trust you. This effort took 8 people 3.5 weeks to recreate 'table-like' visuals (across Netscape and IE 5 and 6) with discrete CSS for each browser because... 'depreciated')... It should have taken 2 people a day, and initially it DID, because it was done, then... 8 people were roped in to redo it all without tables.

I ended up quitting in less than a year.

Re: On Being Indispensable

#284
post #274

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I have never worked for a company that offers sabbaticals and I'm fairly certain I don't even know anyone that works for a company that offers them. I've never met anyone who has mentioned taking one either. AFAIC, they aren't even real.

14 Companies Offering Sabbaticals: https://www.glassdoor.com/blog/42136-2/ 77 Companies that offer sabbaticals: https://fairygodboss.com/career-topics/sabbaticals-77-compan...

Sure the top 100 countries in the world offer them, and the other 50 million companies don't.

Re: On Being Indispensable

#285
post #284

Earlier quoted context omitted.

14 Companies Offering Sabbaticals: https://www.glassdoor.com/blog/42136-2/ 77 Companies that offer sabbaticals: https://fairygodboss.com/career-topics/sabbaticals-77-compan...

Sure the top 100 countries in the world offer them, and the other 50 million companies don't.

The list I posted is certainly not exhaustive. Many companies offer them for the exact reason I stated above -- so they don't come to rely on a single worker.

Re: On Being Indispensable

#286
post #88

"It depends". Like so many things there's no hard and fast rule here. Sometimes you are best being dispensable, and sometimes it's best being indispensable. If you're a contractor and like the work... be indispensable as it will give you more power over your rates. If you're 12-18 months from an IPO... be indispensable as it will ensure the golden handcuff stock option / RSU shower that touches the top ~10% of engine…

[deleted]

Re: On Being Indispensable

#287

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> If given the choice between "my company would be just fine without me" and "everything would fall apart if I didn't show up to work, I found the problem. It’s not “your company”, it’s “the purchaser of your time and attention”. Act accordingly.

I remember reading "Anything you want" by Derek Sivers. There he describes, that he actually went towards "my company would just be fine without me" with his own company. So regardless of being an employee doing bodyleasing towards their employer, being an employee that identifies with "their" company or being a boss/founder/owner/manager these two sides of the axis exist and one needs to find the spot that fits for…

It's a fine line. If you want to stay employed, but not be pigeonholed, you need your company to see a future with you in it, rather than always thinking of you in the present tense, dealing with the latest problems du jour.

I think for me these sorts of pre-emptions have always felt quite jarring, so the feedback loop for me is tighter than for some.

If you bring me a novel problem to solve, I will happily stop what I'm doing and help you figure it out. For some reason I've only rarely had problems getting back into whatever you interrupted. Whereas with fire drills I have trouble spinning back up into what I was doing before. Perhaps to do with finite energy reserves.

Ultimately I credit my early successes getting promoted to Lead to this pattern, because 'novel' problems either explain a wider portion of the overall architecture to me, or end up being all hands on deck when it turns out this issue is bad and is already in production. I cannot emphasize enough how much smarter you sound offering a solution you've had 30 minutes to an hour to think about instead of 10 minutes. The developer who triages an issue is two steps ahead of everyone else who is thinking on the fly. Doubly so if you have to wrangle everyone into a meeting room to discuss things. Unless the other people are vastly smarter or knowledgeable than you, you will hold your own in that conversation, even if you are somewhat junior. And if you're instead on a par, you will excel.

Re: On Being Indispensable

#289

Earlier quoted context omitted.

A one sentence horror story. How much of his life was missed for things the company could do without?

> A one sentence horror story. Too true. My favorite quote on this topic is that "work will never love you back". It's easy to get wrapped up in what we are doing (sometimes the less important it is to the world, the more I need to get wrapped up in it to be motivated), but work pales in comparison to: * a good conversation with a friend * time outside, contemplating nature and purpose * a hug from a family member Bu…

> * a good conversation with a friend

* time outside, contemplating nature and purpose

* a hug from a family member

you can do all these while working a lot....

Re: On Being Indispensable

#290

Earlier quoted context omitted.

That assumes the experts are indeed experts and not just saying no to an experienced consultant/contractor that management hired. Though I agree from the perspective that if the system goes down after the consultant leaves, it’s not their problem. I’ve been around enough to know that these ultimately are political and cultural problems, and you either have to expect change to be slow in these situations or leave to f…

How do you handle the case where Technology X is being deployed because the C-suite was gifted Super Bowl tickets to deploy Technology X? I have been in this exact situation. I left the company as a result; kickbacks and graft aren’t my thing.

Same as any legacy requirement or legal mandate. Deal with it until you get a better job.
Post reply on HN