Live data from Hacker News

U.S. eliminates human controls requirement for fully automated vehicles

reuters.com

111–120 of 376 posts

Re: U.S. eliminates human controls requirement for fully automated vehicles

#111
post #39
post #35

If your vehicle is heading relentlessly toward a group of schoolchildren it would be nice to have a way to override it. Either that or no windows so you won't be haunted by it every night of your life.

We have the technology to replace schoolchildren at a much lower cost than cars

Would that include the piano and karate lessons for the replacement kids?

Re: U.S. eliminates human controls requirement for fully automated vehicles

#112
This is a great step forward, autonomous driving only needs to be better than the average human.

The average human is often too busy texting, or eating to pay attention.

Humans do very stupid things in cars, it's a part of why I won't really consider living anywhere where I have to own one. Holy crap, you'll see people literally just rear-end each other at stoplights because you want to keep itching closer.

One of the most common complaints about automated cars is they go The speed limit, I recall once I was literally at the exact speed limit for the highway and I flicked on the cruise control. Immediately a driver behind me started honking and flicking me off.

Like holy shit I'm not from around here. I'm not going to risk getting pulled over because you're 5 minutes late to brunch or something.

The average human is such a horrible driver. I don't think Tesla bots can do much worse. The times the Tesla AI fails are very rare and far between, the times some idiot human decides they're going to rear end someone, or change lanes to late are very common.

All hell the robocar overlords

Re: U.S. eliminates human controls requirement for fully automated vehicles

#114

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Car accidents kill someone every 100 million miles driven in the US. Anyone claiming they're safer now is either selling something or doesn't know what they're talking about.

Could you share how many accidents happen, rather than deaths? With a source as well, if you happen to be looking it up.

Would you use an autonomous car if the death rate increases but accident rate decreases?

I figure deaths per million miles is a good stat

Re: U.S. eliminates human controls requirement for fully automated vehicles

#115

I think any automated vehicle, no matter how advanced, should always have a big red button to make it stop whatever it's doing. Kind of like the emergency brake on a passenger train.

Logically there needs to be a way to control the car at all times, otherwise you could be locked into a long trip you don’t want to take. The difference is just that it’s higher level controls than a steering wheel.

I'm pretty sure this was an episode on HBO's Silicon Valley. The character's Tesla drove itself onto a container ship with the driver stuck inside, unable to get out of the car.

Re: U.S. eliminates human controls requirement for fully automated vehicles

#116

No steering wheels or brake pedals! Feels scary but we are giving technology way more control over our lives already :-).

After removing the steering wheel and making the car fully autonomous, I bet you'll have to pay a subscription for it to drive. And a subscription for a cellular service.

I absolutely understand the distaste, but you'll have to compare that against your current "subscription" of insurance fees. Hopefully they either go down or go away.

Re: U.S. eliminates human controls requirement for fully automated vehicles

#117

Earlier quoted context omitted.

“Self driving” means that it is far more likely for a human driver to override the car in panic and hit the children than it is for the car to hit the children autonomously.

IF the car does hit the children even while driving autonomously the driver will be held responsible regardless of overrides. If someone dies, someone is going to jail until the justice system works through it.

Did you read the article? There is literally no steering wheel in an autonomous car. There is no "driver", only passengers. Even then, the car could drive itself without any passengers.

Re: U.S. eliminates human controls requirement for fully automated vehicles

#118
post #7

Reading between the lines here this just makes me think that the regulator has become captured by the industry. This is like removing human control on an autonomous Russian roulette revolver that shoots to the side if it detects a person in front of the barrel, then praying for the best.

I find it rather fascinating that we require a human-in-the-loop for a train but not for a car.

New train lines don't require human drivers, but legacy ones do for socio-political reasons rather than logistical or technological ones.

This Wikipedia article kind of shows the mishmash of automated/half-measures/full measures situation:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Automation_of_the_London_Under...

Re: U.S. eliminates human controls requirement for fully automated vehicles

#119
post #106

I think any automated vehicle, no matter how advanced, should always have a big red button to make it stop whatever it's doing. Kind of like the emergency brake on a passenger train.

I'd like to imagine we'd have "manual override" controls like I, Robot (2004) showed: https://youtube.com/shorts/46-EGyn7rwc As implied in the clip, after a few years of self-driving cars, most passengers won't know how to drive well enough for it to be safe and other autonomous vehicles might not coordinate well with a manual driver. A "pull over" button could work, but still relies on the automated driving capabili…

Pull overs are much easier to automate than driving, their automated version will probably be much safer than regular automated driving.

Re: U.S. eliminates human controls requirement for fully automated vehicles

#120
This is problematic for a number of reasons. The most important in my mind is that the risk of the vehicle being hacked and carjacked remotely is always present.

With the presence of an automation kill-switch and manual human controls the driver can always take back control.

Without those, the driver is at the mercy of the hacker.

Vehicle automation falls under the SCADA sub-domain of cyber-security. SCADA stands for Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition, and the cyber-security in SCADA systems is light-years behind. Pro-tip: going into cyber and want a good certification (if such a thing exists)..then get CISSP-SCADA.

Some relevant articles:

[1] https://physicsworld.com/a/how-to-hack-a-self-driving-car/

[2] https://hackernoon.com/how-to-hack-self-driving-cars-vulnera...

[3] https://blog.tesu.edu/should-we-be-worried-about-the-hacking...

Post reply on HN