Live data from Hacker News

The new silent majority: People who don't tweet

axios.com

31–40 of 784 posts

Re: The new silent majority: People who don't tweet

#31

> Independents — who are somewhere in the middle This seems factually wrong? Maybe most independents are in between the two parties, but not all. Look at Bernie Sanders for example, I would say he's to the left of the Democratic party. I thought maybe the Gallup poll they are referencing had a weird definition of an independent requiring it to be between the two parties, but I'm not seeing that either.

Your hunch is right. The "moderate middle" trope is a product of lazy pundits and independent voters are actually all over the ideological map - https://fivethirtyeight.com/features/the-moderate-middle-is-...

Re: The new silent majority: People who don't tweet

#32

Can someone explain why they would ever put something on Twitter that is not marketing related? (I get it for business, but why for personal use?)

Probably for the same reasons you just posted this comment.

But I only post here because this community is worth interacting with.

Twitter's community is the entire world. (as far as I know)

Re: The new silent majority: People who don't tweet

#33
Yea, I don't tweet. I have a twitter but don't see any point to tweet anything. That also means I have 0 followers. Made like 3 comments max.

I don't really think about twitter as a social network. For me it's more like complete shitfest which is sometimes informative and/or funny.

Re: The new silent majority: People who don't tweet

#34

I don't engage on Twitter out of fear. I sometimes see posts that I like and want to retweet but I don't because it means I'm endorsing everything the author has ever said or ever will say. It's not worth the risk. People in my demographic face significant exposure to "cancelling" or ambushing for wrongthink. So it's best for me to avoid it entirely.

It's really easy to not be "canceled", just be a good person. What genuinely OK opinion are people being canceled for?

Re: The new silent majority: People who don't tweet

#35
twtter has about 70 million US users, out of a population of 330 million (does twitter have an age cutoff for users?). One would presume that twitter is like other services, where a small percentage of the user base is producing a larger percentage of the content.

So 'most people don't tweet' isn't really that much of a stretch.

Re: The new silent majority: People who don't tweet

#37
In analyzing my personal motivations and looking at "common sense" knowledge and psych research on the topic, I've come to the conclusion that we gain a lot of motivational energy from others. We live in worlds of stories and narratives, and those narratives are strengthened when mirrored and shared by others. If someone notices or sees my work or praises me for my work, it is a strong signal to my brain that it's on the right track.

It was embarrassing for me to admit this, but I've found it to be a running thread throughout my educational and work career. I suspect it dominates my brain more because of early childhood experiences more, but I'm unsure because it seems taboo to admit to craving acceptance or acknowledgement.

Once I began admitting it to myself, it became a big part of what drives my growth. I now know the impact that accountability has on my success. I'd rather feel slightly embarrassed for wanting people to see my toy projects than limit my personal trajectory out of fear. I am mindful of depending on others for validation, and I try to strike a healthy balance between wanting to impress others and wanting to impress myself.

Apropos to the topic at hand, I'm using Twitter and Observable to "learn in public". I don't expect or intend to become an influencer. I just know that I can leverage the dopamine hits of upvotes and likes and retweets for my personal growth. I'm a social animal that needs to have his efforts directed through shared structures of meaning. So far, I've leveraged that in multiple areas to great effect.

Re: The new silent majority: People who don't tweet

#38

I kept Twitter to "advertise" when I write technical blogs which I do very little of these days due to time. I follow a bunch of tech type stuff I'm interested in, but honestly, it's become more of a place to vent and whine about this or that. When I step back and look at it from afar, it's kinda what Facebook was when I left it a decade or so ago; people whining, and any subject worth commenting on is too controvers…

[deleted]

Re: The new silent majority: People who don't tweet

#39

I kept Twitter to "advertise" when I write technical blogs which I do very little of these days due to time. I follow a bunch of tech type stuff I'm interested in, but honestly, it's become more of a place to vent and whine about this or that. When I step back and look at it from afar, it's kinda what Facebook was when I left it a decade or so ago; people whining, and any subject worth commenting on is too controvers…

It is a sign of the trying times we live in that I saw the extra "z"s in your post and instead of assuming a typo, I immediately think of Russian hackers infiltrating this platform.

Re: The new silent majority: People who don't tweet

#40

Earlier quoted context omitted.

>People in my demographic face significant exposure to "cancelling" or ambushing for wrongthink. I don't use Twitter or pretty much say anything publicly for the same reason, but note that this is definitely a risk for people of all demographics.

It is far more risk for some than others. If you have a minority viewpoint, you get attacked far more easily.

I would even say viewpoint of not the vocal minority. That is even near majority viewpoint, but if it is one not popular on twitter it is risky...
Post reply on HN