Earlier quoted context omitted.
ukraine was pretty much always at least partially owned by russia. One of the first centralized slavic states were the kieven rus. russia and ukraine are tied and its not offensive or wrong to say something like "russian ukraine"
If by "pretty much always" you want to completely ignore the period where large part of it used to be Polish, then sure. Pretty much always.
World's only An-225 destroyed by Russian airstrikes
121–130 of 178 posts
Re: World's only An-225 destroyed by Russian airstrikes
#122How does type rating work for this one off kind of plane? How do you get hours in the one plane, and is there a simulator? Also what do you do when the plane you're rated for is destroyed?
Mriya’s crew were definitely rated for other planes (almost certainly the An-124 it was derived from for instance): Mriya was expensive to fly, and you’d only charter if if you really needed its lifting capabilities (whether weight or volume). It would not be flying year-round in the first place, so you’d want multiple crew rated for it (so one would be available when an order came in) but you wouldn’t want those cre…
They had an office in London for booking and planning so it must have earned them some decent wedge, especially without any direct competitors.
I don't know how much maintenance it needed in between though.
Re: World's only An-225 destroyed by Russian airstrikes
#123Re: World's only An-225 destroyed by Russian airstrikes
#124I was confused about this. I presumed Antonov Airlines was a Russian airline, so I was wondering why the Russians would destroy their own planes. But Antonov Airlines is a Ukrainian company: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antonov_Airlines The plane was designed in Soviet (Russian) Ukraine (ie before 1991) to carry the Soviet (Russian) space shuttle. edited to say Soviet, not Russian
The Russian space program isn't even in Russia. Baikonur Cosmodrome is in Kazakhstan. So you can see these countries hold a very high strategic value to Russia. The ghosts of the Soviet Union are still haunting us to this day.
https://spacenews.com/the-long-road-to-vostochny-inside-russ...
Re: World's only An-225 destroyed by Russian airstrikes
#125Re: World's only An-225 destroyed by Russian airstrikes
#126I posted this comment on a less popular thread a few days ago: I had the luck of seeing this plane on approach to IAH airport while driving in Houston. For the first few minutes, it looked like a normal size plane, but felt too low and too slow. Then for the next few minutes, it kept getting bigger and bigger. Then I saw it had 6 engines. And a tail wing that seemed as large as a normal plane’s wingspan. I was lucky…
Re: World's only An-225 destroyed by Russian airstrikes
#127Earlier quoted context omitted.
What is Russian Ukraine? How old are you?
ukraine was pretty much always at least partially owned by russia. One of the first centralized slavic states were the kieven rus. russia and ukraine are tied and its not offensive or wrong to say something like "russian ukraine"
This is the reason why we should never redraw lines on a map over historical claims. It gets messy fast.
Re: World's only An-225 destroyed by Russian airstrikes
#128Earlier quoted context omitted.
If by "pretty much always" you want to completely ignore the period where large part of it used to be Polish, then sure. Pretty much always.
The entire western section of Ukraine was Polish before WW2.
Re: World's only An-225 destroyed by Russian airstrikes
#129Quoted post unavailable.
Even is this is true, without Russian invasion, there would be no need for Ukrainian shells barrage.
Re: World's only An-225 destroyed by Russian airstrikes
#130Even the B-2 Spirit bomber, most likely the most expensive aircraft only costs $2.1 billion.