I have a great deal of skepticism concerning fully-autonomous cars, TBH. There are just too many corner cases around weather and sensing, etc., not to mention insurance and other regulatory hurdles. Personally, the idea of "a wire in the road" by which I mean something like cats-eyes in the road but with RFID tags placed every 40 feet, or some other common means maintained by the DOT that all cars can use to sense wh…
I have formally accepted the CEO job at Cruise once again
201–207 of 207 posts
Re: I have formally accepted the CEO job at Cruise once again
#202Earlier quoted context omitted.
It's worth being precise about the terminology: Autopilot comes with the car (autosteer), FSD is what costs $10k extra. Conflating the two makes it harder to have a conversation about what either actually is or does.
But, they are both scams.
Re: I have formally accepted the CEO job at Cruise once again
#203Earlier quoted context omitted.
Am I missing something? What specifically is a paradigm shift in the last three months?
Elsewhere in this subthread was mentions CLIP[0] About 2/3rds down the page features 'Object tracking' and 'Robotic control' [0] https://blog.roboflow.com/openai-clip/
Re: I have formally accepted the CEO job at Cruise once again
#204Earlier quoted context omitted.
> I absolutely think the type of decision we're talking about can be modelled. The possibility is not in dispute. Billions of biological organisms do these things everyday. But this is: > It's pretty much how your brain solves these sorts of problems too, there's no magic to intuition or human decision-making. Is it how the brain works? My ball example isn't about it having a closed solution. If you throw a ball I ca…
Yes, to some degree, we know that brains work that way. It’s not a big mystery. (What is a mystery is the exact way things are wired up, but not the building blocks, and not the general organizational principles.) Source: I did neuroanatomy in med school (but am not a doctor).
You don't think that's a lot of hand waving? Can you explain why the details wouldn't matter?
Re: I have formally accepted the CEO job at Cruise once again
#205Re: I have formally accepted the CEO job at Cruise once again
#206Huge fan of Kyle and the Cruise team. I remember covering Cruise in a class assignment back in 2014, and was very skeptical of the idea of selling self driving kits to existing car owners. Ever since, they've gotten acquired (or something) and are holding up their own against behemoths in the space. Cruise's reviews on Blind are pretty bad, something that keeps me away from joining them as an employee, but I suppose…
As someone who recently left, many of the complaints on blind aren't anywhere close to my personal experiences. I enjoyed the technical side (which is a bit chaotic), but the admin side is borderline antagonistic to the rest of the company. Moreover, the company is on the losing side of a power struggle with GM. The former CEO was a victim of that, seemingly as was the equity and compensation plan.
Re: I have formally accepted the CEO job at Cruise once again
#207Earlier quoted context omitted.
Yes, to some degree, we know that brains work that way. It’s not a big mystery. (What is a mystery is the exact way things are wired up, but not the building blocks, and not the general organizational principles.) Source: I did neuroanatomy in med school (but am not a doctor).
> to some degree > What is a mystery is the exact way things are wired up You don't think that's a lot of hand waving? Can you explain why the details wouldn't matter?
I don't want to mislead, there is an incredible amount of stuff we don't know... But we do understand more than most well-informed people think, even people in adjacent fields.