8 hours reading :( (vs 3 weeks for e-ink)
Don't forget: 7+ hours video (vs 0 for e-ink)
http://gigaom.com/2011/07/08/how-do-you-get-video-on-kindle-...
It just has a very low frame rate. And no sound ;)
81–90 of 101 posts
8 hours reading :( (vs 3 weeks for e-ink)
Don't forget: 7+ hours video (vs 0 for e-ink)
http://gigaom.com/2011/07/08/how-do-you-get-video-on-kindle-...
It just has a very low frame rate. And no sound ;)
Well at $199 with that kind of integrated experience there is little room for complaints! ($300 would be a different story.) Plus it supports Flash and most Android games/apps from Amazon app store. If people put up a better email client on Amazon store for decent price it would be even better. For someone who already has Prime but no tablet - this is a no brainer. Thinking of all this - I think this will eat into th…
k9 mail (free, open source) is already available on amazon's android appstore, and it's a much better client than the stock android email app.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Why wouldn't they mention the RAM it has? Why wouldn't they mention what wireless chipset it has? Why wouldn't they mention the amount of internal storage? I can answer all these questions, as well as the hundred other ones that geeks will ask: Because none of this matters to the millions of people who will buy them. To understand the difference between a company that "gets it" and your average geek who wonders why t…
Well actually they don't mention what version of Android because they have modified it so much it probably doesn't matter. On the other hand, they DO mention how much ram and internal storage it has.
I think it's not a good move for Amazon. E-Ink kindles are much more useful and friendly for book readers. They would choose to improve it with an html5 application platform (check this out; http://www.flickr.com/photos/azer/5966867029/ )
Earlier quoted context omitted.
http://www.bgr.com/2011/04/05/mlb-com-ceo-android-users-less... The Android platform offers a broad range of possible devices. There's a plethora of low end devices that account for almost no purchases. If you're looking anecdotally, more developers are likely to have high-end androids (i.e. people you're likely to see). Those aren't representative of the android demographic as a whole, which is less likely to pay fo…
Pretty weak stuff, here is a counter example http://blogs.computerworld.com/17941/android_ios_app_profit
There's several reasons why there's less developers focusing on Android. One of the biggest is the way the Android Marketplace updates their most popular app lists. The list changes much less frequently than iOS. With an overall bias of all users towards checking out apps on the top list, it's just more difficult to get seen on Android. Beyond that, there's less demand for apps outside the top 10 list on Android. Big app companies will continue to support the platform. Indie developers will continue to make it less of a priority since they don't make as much money there.
It's obvious you're an Android supporter. There's nothing wrong with that. There's a lot to like about the platform. If someone's criteria for a tablet is access to lots of high quality apps, Android is not the platform for them. There's a reason Disney chose to support iOS for their new Cars interactive app. That's where the majority of the money is for developers, and where most developers will focus, for at least the near term.
http://www.pcworld.com/article/238375/android_users_only_hav...
Earlier quoted context omitted.
The issue with the Android platform, and these new low cost devices perpetuate, is that Android users spend significantly less on apps. Android is getting good traction in the low end smart phone market, but those people just aren't buying apps. The Amazon product seems to be centered around Amazon's offerings, making it more of a media device than an app device. If having access to lots of high quality apps is impor…
I don't believe your statement is true, do you have any stats?
I can't help but think of the Kindle commercial on the beach where the iPad owner asks the Kindle owner, "It works in sunlight?"
Funny tip: It was only last weekend I discovered than an iPad works with polarized sunglasses on, IF you use it in landscape mode. That was a major d'oh realization. I hope for Amazon's sake, the Fire works in sunlight.
Well at $199 with that kind of integrated experience there is little room for complaints! ($300 would be a different story.) Plus it supports Flash and most Android games/apps from Amazon app store. If people put up a better email client on Amazon store for decent price it would be even better. For someone who already has Prime but no tablet - this is a no brainer. Thinking of all this - I think this will eat into th…
> does not support connecting to ad-hoc (or peer-to-peer) Wi-Fi networks. That struck me as a little odd at first, but after considering it for a minute, I think it's probably a smart move.
why?
Also, as I understand it, to only plays local content and internet content - nothing from the local network.