Individuals should not be funding foreign militaries. It does not matter if the country was unjustly attacked or not.
On the removal of Come Back Alive
171–180 of 428 posts
Re: On the removal of Come Back Alive
#172Crowd sourced wars; we are living in a world a previous generation would hold up as a dark dystopia.
Re: On the removal of Come Back Alive
#173Quoted post unavailable.
> For those still looking to help, Ukrainian journalists have recommended several charities and platforms that would benefit from donations, such as the Ukrainian Red Cross Society, Voices of Children, and Revived Soldiers Ukraine. There are also 3,000+ Ukrainian creators on Patreon – and thousands more using other platforms – who would benefit from our support. Patreon seems to realize that donations are needed and…
Re: On the removal of Come Back Alive
#174Re: On the removal of Come Back Alive
#175Earlier quoted context omitted.
Let them. Bitcoin is about freedom.
"Bitcoin is about freedom", you say as a response to Bitcoin being used to fund an invasion? How do you not see the absurdity of this claim?
Ukranian government is very much pro-crypto. https://www.kmu.gov.ua/en/news/parlament-uhvaliv-zakon-pro-v...
Re: On the removal of Come Back Alive
#176Earlier quoted context omitted.
Consider both the US and Russia eventually left Afghanistan.
Look at the cost though. Afghanistan is the poorest country in the world, people are actually starving there now, women aren't allowed to work, people are being murdered for their political beliefs. Just so they could give their invaders a bloody nose.
Re: On the removal of Come Back Alive
#177Earlier quoted context omitted.
principled move? Which principles were they following? the principles that made it OK for 8 years, or the principles were they decided to side with Russia's agressions once the real invasion started.
Not implying a moral judgement in my question, I just noticed a lot of other comments jump directly into the discussion suggested by your statement without ever qualifying whether Patreon has political pressure (whether intrinsic or extrinsic) that would influence their decision one way or the other. I think it adds important nuance / clarification to the situation.
A principled decision is one you make regardless of outside pressures - i.e. you stick by your principles; clearly patreon has no principles in play here. If it was wrong to allow donations, it was wrong since 8 years ago as they happily collected their commissions on donations.
Re: On the removal of Come Back Alive
#178Quoted post unavailable.
> For those still looking to help, Ukrainian journalists have recommended several charities and platforms that would benefit from donations, such as the Ukrainian Red Cross Society, Voices of Children, and Revived Soldiers Ukraine. There are also 3,000+ Ukrainian creators on Patreon – and thousands more using other platforms – who would benefit from our support. Patreon seems to realize that donations are needed and…
Re: On the removal of Come Back Alive
#179"It is a violation of our policies, and so we have removed the page." What a shit fucking response. Following a policy that you arbitrarily created yourself is not a reasonable justification for anything.
Would you be satisfied if they just came out and said "Patreon is a small financial services company. Not black-ops mercenary outfit. Not a powerful nation state. If you expect us to face down powerful nation states on your behalf, we suggest that you sign up HERE to fight on the front lines in Ukraine yourself." ?
Re: On the removal of Come Back Alive
#180Their comment is technically valid. The timing of the block is bad though. It'd be great if they could comment on the timing.
One twitter comment mentions the account has been active for several years. Call me paranoid, but it's too big of a coincidence that it was closed exactly today.