love that Americans are always worried about some sort of national ID/database of citizens being used for nefarious needs
The main issue is if it's required. Not so worried about myself - I'm a veteran which means my fingerprints and DNA are already on file with the feds somewhere :), but US Citizens with no particular connection to the federal government absolutely shouldn't have to need a "National ID."
IRS to adopt Login.gov as user authentication tool
21–30 of 193 posts
Re: IRS to adopt Login.gov as user authentication tool
#22login.gov is open source! They also encrypt user data in a way that they can't access it without the user's password, precluding the formation of a national registry that could be used towards nefarious and anti-democratic purposes. As a result, account recovery looks a lot like re-registration, which I think is a great thing. https://github.com/18F/identity-idp It's built on Rails, and I'm really impressed at the en…
I love how low our standards for government sites have gotten where this is seen as a plus and not something that's expected
Re: IRS to adopt Login.gov as user authentication tool
#23Re: IRS to adopt Login.gov as user authentication tool
#24I'm glad they are adopting it. Login.gov was always kind of funny, like here use this to login to all US govt resources...except for this service, and this service, and all these services...
Re: IRS to adopt Login.gov as user authentication tool
#25If you use Customs and Border Patrol's trusted traveler programs (or some other gov sites), you may already have a login.gov account since that is what they have been using for a few years now.
Yet the reason I have a login.gov account is for my NEXUS enrollment which means I've been fingerprinted, background checked, had my passport number linked, and been interviewed in person by two different governments. That seems pretty identity verified to me.
If I have to go through some other step, especially if it involves yet another biometric or interview check, that's going to be annoying.
Re: IRS to adopt Login.gov as user authentication tool
#26love that Americans are always worried about some sort of national ID/database of citizens being used for nefarious needs
In my mind, governments are like companies both are comprised of people making decisions which may or may not align with my personal interests. I want a GDPR for the government.
Re: IRS to adopt Login.gov as user authentication tool
#27Earlier quoted context omitted.
The main issue is if it's required. Not so worried about myself - I'm a veteran which means my fingerprints and DNA are already on file with the feds somewhere :), but US Citizens with no particular connection to the federal government absolutely shouldn't have to need a "National ID."
And yet, everyone suffers because of it. We have endless SSN breaches because at the end of the day, having a unique ID for people is really valuable! We could have something way safer, but we get stuck with the status quo which satisfies no one.
The two options presented before my comment are not the only ones.
Re: IRS to adopt Login.gov as user authentication tool
#28love that Americans are always worried about some sort of national ID/database of citizens being used for nefarious needs
Re: IRS to adopt Login.gov as user authentication tool
#29I'm a foreigner (yes, I know, sorry, sorry) who is a "US Person" and thus needs to (and, to be perfectly clear, is happy to, I'm sorry, I'm not-sorry, I'm sorry about being not-sorry?) pay US income tax. The IRS system is, by far, the worst I've ever had to deal with, and in this I'm comparing the US to countries like Rwanda, where, for some weird reason, I'm also required to pay taxes. Getting an ITIN (sort-of like…
> The IRS system is, by far, the worst I've ever had to deal with That's by design
Re: IRS to adopt Login.gov as user authentication tool
#30love that Americans are always worried about some sort of national ID/database of citizens being used for nefarious needs
The main issue is if it's required. Not so worried about myself - I'm a veteran which means my fingerprints and DNA are already on file with the feds somewhere :), but US Citizens with no particular connection to the federal government absolutely shouldn't have to need a "National ID."
Fingerprint and DNA are a completely different thing, and crazily intrusive to collect on a central location.