Live data from Hacker News

A simple system I’m using to stay in touch with hundreds of people

jakobgreenfeld.com

291–300 of 510 posts

Re: A simple system I’m using to stay in touch with hundreds of people

#291

The OP's system seems good, but the initial system, where the guy lists everyone he knows by A, B, C and D seems like he's creating informational toxic waste, IE something that causes damage if it gets out. Even if all it means is they get less emails, who the hell wants to find themselves categorized as acquaintance level D.

But if you grind out friendship rep points you can pretty easily get to B tier. A tier takes finesse and finding their favorite gift.

Re: A simple system I’m using to stay in touch with hundreds of people

#292

The OP's system seems good, but the initial system, where the guy lists everyone he knows by A, B, C and D seems like he's creating informational toxic waste, IE something that causes damage if it gets out. Even if all it means is they get less emails, who the hell wants to find themselves categorized as acquaintance level D.

It shouldn't be a surprise to anyone - if you talk to someone twice a year you wouldn't expect to be in their closest friends group. I can't imagine someone being offended by this as a mature adult.

Re: A simple system I’m using to stay in touch with hundreds of people

#293

The biggest reason I don't maintain contact with people from my past is I was a much worse person in my past and I'm either embarrassed about my behavior or concerned that my shittiness is what led to our relationship in the first place. In any case, I find it's easier (and emotionally satisfying) to stay in touch with a couple people that I can have natural, unforced conversations with. Scheduling interactions on a…

> The biggest reason I don't maintain contact with people from my past is I was a much worse person in my past and I'm either embarrassed about my behavior or concerned that my shittiness is what led to our relationship in the first place. Perfect summary. The people I'm still in contact with are those that grew into better people together with me.

I like to think I chose depth over breadth. I can count my real friends on one hand and I feel like we have deep and meaningful friendships. They're people who I've been through some shit with, or people who I'd be prepared to go through some shit with if it came to it.

Everyone else is someone who can come and go. How long are they around for? Who knows, it's just a temporary crossing of paths that feels nice while it lasts. I couldn't maintain a connect with hundreds of people unless fate crossed our paths again.

But, you know, even those deep connections might be temporary, just on a longer timeframe. If one connection faded then perhaps there'd be room for a new one.

Re: A simple system I’m using to stay in touch with hundreds of people

#295
post #80
post #74

Earlier quoted context omitted.

But this doesn't work for contacts I do not reach regularly... I just forget about them when I don't reach them at all for some longer time.

That’s good! It means people who aren’t actually part of your busy life will get pruned out, and you’ll be left with more time to deal with people who actually matter.

The thing about parsing your social network down to just a tiny group of close friends is A) it makes it harder to develop more close friends, since friendship tends to work like a funnel where you start out shallow and become better friends through time/exposure, and B) eventually you start to lose friends, whether to physical distance, falling out, life events, and eventually death, and if you only have a tiny group, it's easy for the bottom to fall out of your friend group entirely.

I've watched this happen with a lot of older adults I know, which is one of the reasons I've deliberately made some efforts to keep a pool of shallow friendships. Some of them have already deepened into actual friends, some fall off and that's ok, because that's kind of the point. Casting a wider net is part of a strategy to not end up in my later years with 0-2 total friends in my life.

Re: A simple system I’m using to stay in touch with hundreds of people

#296
post #77

Many people have mentioned Monica, which is what I use for this. I live overseas from loved ones and old friends, meaning there are few natural cues to encourage communication. Without very regular chats my memory doesn't let me be as in context with the major things happening in their lives as I need to be to have meaningful conversations with them. Monica helps with both of these things. Getting reminders only real…

Do you have a link to this? Every search query I try produces results for the character Monica from Friends. Seems like exceptionally poor SEO, heh.

Re: A simple system I’m using to stay in touch with hundreds of people

#297
post #205

Interesting way to approach it, my approach might be less technical, when someone comes to mind randomly, I just txt them with: Hey, you just popped into my mind, I hope all is well with you and yours! It's simple, lightweight, and you'd be shocked how often the other person pings back. My completely un-scientific view is that most people think of others once in a while. Perhaps we're too busy to reach out, or the gu…

If I ever received a message like that I would be completely weirded out, is this a thing people actually do?

Re: A simple system I’m using to stay in touch with hundreds of people

#298

The OP's system seems good, but the initial system, where the guy lists everyone he knows by A, B, C and D seems like he's creating informational toxic waste, IE something that causes damage if it gets out. Even if all it means is they get less emails, who the hell wants to find themselves categorized as acquaintance level D.

But if you grind out friendship rep points you can pretty easily get to B tier. A tier takes finesse and finding their favorite gift.

Going to take a page from gaming and classify friends as Unobtanium, platinum, gold, silver.

Re: A simple system I’m using to stay in touch with hundreds of people

#299

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I mean, I have a lot of friends who I don't live near who will periodically post pictures on Instagram or updates about their lives on FB. Scanning their feed for a few minutes if they're active on social media is a good way to make sure you're at least a little up-to-date on what's going on in their life, and will frequently give you a good hook for a conversation (i.e. how is little So-and-So?, or I saw your trip p…

> It's never fun to ask someone who just got divorced how their spouse is doing. Right, same for a lost pregnancy, but that’s not a subject to post to social media. Personally I would not advertise a divorce there either. It’s only natural to expect someone to ask about such things because they’re not up to date, and I find that okay. The fact they’re asking even if I hadn’t told them is expected and makes me feel be…

Or gossip! Gossip gets a bad rap, and it can certainly be toxic, but it was the only semi-reliable way to get info about some of this stuff back in the day. I know everyone moans about social media and the mediated self and whatnot, but I kinda like that you can tell people what's going on in your life in a broadcast form and they can follow you and it doesn't always have to be high-touch.

Re: A simple system I’m using to stay in touch with hundreds of people

#300
post #77

Many people have mentioned Monica, which is what I use for this. I live overseas from loved ones and old friends, meaning there are few natural cues to encourage communication. Without very regular chats my memory doesn't let me be as in context with the major things happening in their lives as I need to be to have meaningful conversations with them. Monica helps with both of these things. Getting reminders only real…

Do you have a link to this? Every search query I try produces results for the character Monica from Friends. Seems like exceptionally poor SEO, heh.

https://www.monicahq.com/
Post reply on HN