Live data from Hacker News

Shoplifting reaches crisis proportions

axios.com

111–120 of 233 posts

Re: Shoplifting reaches crisis proportions

#111
post #93

Let the market handle this. Simply close stores with high theft rates, which will happen anyway since they’re unprofitable.

Yea I mean why have police at all? Just let the market sort out all out. If people keep getting shot, we’ll eventually the neighborhood will empty out and no more shootings!

People would pool money and hire a private protection agency then.

Re: Shoplifting reaches crisis proportions

#112

I'd like anyone who considers more harsh jail punishments to be the solution to consider that the USA has the highest per-capita prison population in the world. Only 1/5 of those prisoners is in there for drug-related crime. Perhaps harsher punishments aren't going to help here.

I’d also like anyone who promotes harsher punishments to actually go through the system for just a day before they insist on locking others into it. Getting arrested permanently changed my view on our justice system. It was a nonviolent offense, related to a paperwork issue, but it resulted in a bench warrant being issued for me. If I hadn’t just received several thousand dollars in my account from an unexpected wind…

How are jail fees not illegal extra-judicial punishment?

Re: Shoplifting reaches crisis proportions

#113

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Why should firefighters put out fires? They make no money from it. It costs them money in equipment wear, water usage, etc.!

Because they get paid to do it - they literally make money from fighting fires

How does this business of fire fighting make money? All they do is spend money on equipment, labor, etc. Where is their income coming from, and who is incentivized to keep paying them despite no profit and no return on investment ever?

Re: Shoplifting reaches crisis proportions

#114

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> This shoplifting epidemic is happening because no one is going to jail for this. Is that true? https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2018/may/17/walmart-shop...

The article you have provided is from 2018 and primarily deals with a single individual that had several other outstanding warrants, it has no bearing on what was stated prior.

It sounded like what you said was "This shoplifting epidemic is happening because no one is going to jail for this."

I disagree, I do think people are going to jail for this.

Re: Shoplifting reaches crisis proportions

#115

I'd like anyone who considers more harsh jail punishments to be the solution to consider that the USA has the highest per-capita prison population in the world. Only 1/5 of those prisoners is in there for drug-related crime. Perhaps harsher punishments aren't going to help here.

Consider another few possibilities. 1. Americans are just more likely to be criminals. 2. Other nations may be equally or even more ineffective at tackling crime. The assumption that jail doesn't work rests on the assumption that other nations track crime as effectively and that their people are equally criminal.

Here’s another option one:

3. The American system is putting a lot of innocent people behind bars.

Re: Shoplifting reaches crisis proportions

#116

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Why should firefighters put out fires? They make no money from it. It costs them money in equipment wear, water usage, etc.!

I'm sympathetic to your grandparent statement (closing stores can really screw their patrons), but the comparison to firefighters is apples to oranges. Firefighting is a civic utility-everyone contributes a little bit for the service. Grocery stores are not, in most locales.

If no one fights fires, they burn uncontrollably and we all die. If no grocery stores operate, we all starve and die. Feeding the people is the same level of protection as fighting fires.

Re: Shoplifting reaches crisis proportions

#117

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Why should firefighters put out fires? They make no money from it. It costs them money in equipment wear, water usage, etc.!

People could pay for a service where firefighters would come and put out a potential fire at their house.

What if your neighbor decides not to pay their fire fighting bill? You going to be happy about living within feet of their uncontrolled blaze?

Re: Shoplifting reaches crisis proportions

#118
Lately there are a lot of people who want to sell this story of out-of-control shoplifting, but as the article itself notes at the end, it might be bullshit:

> Yes, but: An analysis of crime statistics and other reporting by The Atlantic [1] cast doubt on what it called the "great shoplifting freak-out," citing "fuzzy data" and asserting that what's being lumped together as shoplifting is actually a variety of violent crimes.

[1] https://www.theatlantic.com/health/archive/2021/12/shoplifti...

Re: Shoplifting reaches crisis proportions

#119

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Why should my grocery store close because people are stealing things from it? What do I do, just starve?

I mean, if the people running the store can't profitably operate (due to theft or other factors), why should they operate? Why should the owners of that supermarket go into ruin just to give you another shopping option? Why is it their responsibility to keep you fed at all?

My grandfather owned and operated an early contemporary grocery store, growing from his fruit stand. Before self-service shopping and the checkout line, you would just give the grocer a list of what you would need and they would get it from the inventory. This also made theft impractical. Now, with the skyrocketing cost of retail rent, and other costs affiliated with retail store operations, we see a return full-service shopping with apps and food service operating out of ghost kitchens, we're finding out we don't need grocery stores.

Re: Shoplifting reaches crisis proportions

#120

Let the market handle this. Simply close stores with high theft rates, which will happen anyway since they’re unprofitable.

> Let the market handle this. Not sure I want that. When the state refuses to protect private property, the market solution tends to look more like Vito Corleone. That's especially true when it appears certain organized crime groups are perpetrating coordinated thefts like the one at Nordstrom. The big corporations can't afford to to have mafia payments on the books, but they can afford to pack up and leave or encase…

I think that the OP is ironic, and suggests that the market will force everyone reasonable to leave, exposing California as a failed state.

While that would indeed he instructive, it also would be quite destructive. I hope California can return to protecting the liberties that were already well-understood 200 years ago without going to such extremes.

Post reply on HN