Live data from Hacker News

Google Maps now requires WiFi scanning to use navigation

news.ycombinator.com

301–310 of 447 posts

Re: Google Maps now requires WiFi scanning to use navigation

#301
post #296

Here we go again. Users desperately need an abstraction layer in Android that can spoof sensor data on a per-application basis. In this case, the spoofing layer could be set up such that whenever Google Maps uses the Android API to ask "Is wifi location sensing turned on" the spoofing layer would say "Yes." When GM asks "What wifi networks are around?" the spoofing layer would say "None." (Even better would be for it…

big yes to this. whenever an app asks for a permission i want these options: allow deny pretend allow but send empty responses (like no wifi found) pretend allow but send fake responses

this was supported with Xprivacy many years ago and it was fantastic, but it stopped getting support. The entire pro-privacy android scene seems to have become a very small niche over the years

Re: Google Maps now requires WiFi scanning to use navigation

#302
I've had some issues lately, but after a reboot it seems to work again.

Unless maybe if you need the car navigation, google maps seems to work well as a progressive web app (and since it's sandboxed by the browser, it can only use the actual GPS).

On the last days I'm actually more pissed-off with the update of Google translate than Google maps.

Re: Google Maps now requires WiFi scanning to use navigation

#303

Earlier quoted context omitted.

iPhones are strictly worse for what OP is complaining about. You cannot get your location at all in any app without enabling WiFi scanning. https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=21708157 OP's solution of installing another Android maps app is probably the best available option that fits OP's privacy requirements.

When did this change? Last time I had an iOS device it was definitely possible to use GPS without WiFi. If this is a recent regression that is disappointing.

Simply turning off the wifi icon doesn't turn off wifi.

Re: Google Maps now requires WiFi scanning to use navigation

#304

This is your monthly reminder that Google absolutely does not care about your or anyone else's privacy. They only care about building a higher resolution view of the little ant farm of humanity that they think they own. > Google has now drawn a line in the sand. Give us all your local SSIDs, local bluetooth connections, with likely even more detail, or they now refuse to allow you to use Maps to navigate. Oh, that's…

>If GLS's data harvesting practices were made public

are you speculating, or sharing a comment of something you know to be true? \

Re: Google Maps now requires WiFi scanning to use navigation

#305

This is your monthly reminder that Google absolutely does not care about your or anyone else's privacy. They only care about building a higher resolution view of the little ant farm of humanity that they think they own. > Google has now drawn a line in the sand. Give us all your local SSIDs, local bluetooth connections, with likely even more detail, or they now refuse to allow you to use Maps to navigate. Oh, that's…

I'd like to know more about your last paragraph. Do you have any sources?

Re: Google Maps now requires WiFi scanning to use navigation

#306

Earlier quoted context omitted.

"You could maybe argue that Google Maps is part of a package you bought the phone for" Microsoft lost the case to be able to directly control the user's browser experience: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Microsoft_Cor... .

They lost that case in 2001. I honestly doubt they'd lose it today.

Overturned at appeal and afterwards settled. So I wouldn't count it as a loss for Microsoft.

Re: Google Maps now requires WiFi scanning to use navigation

#307
post #81

While I'm not sure if this change to Google Maps has been or will be widely rolled out, you may want to look into what GrapheneOS is working on with their Google Play compatibility layer [1]. It basically lets people use Google's services inside Android's standard app sandbox. That means they don't get access to privileged system APIs and can only access what the user chooses. It can also be used without a Google acc…

I wondered how long before google will have a reason for grapheneOS to suddenly stop being supoorted on the pixel. Now i know it will be soon and i get to tell everyone i told you so

Google is moving all Android distributors to upstream Linux, so I guess it is us telling you so :).

Re: Google Maps now requires WiFi scanning to use navigation

#308
post #3

What are some reliable alternatives for both iOS and Android? I'm unsure how are Apple Maps, but they were hideous a while back for Eastern Europe at least.

There are still places in the world where Apple Maps isn't great, but for 90% of people they're now as good for navigation, if not better (since they've built a data gathering operation). Last year I used Apple Maps for a 34,000 mile road trip. No significant issues.

For integrity, I wish Apple Maps available on web.

Re: Google Maps now requires WiFi scanning to use navigation

#309
post #86

Refusing service when the user does not consent to non-essential data sharing is illegal in the EU, and it also breaches Google Play's developer agreement. WiFi scanning is not essential to navigate with an app, and the least they could do to follow the law is to gracefully degrade the service if the user does not consent to share data about nearby devices, such as disabling traffic predictions. Of course Google's la…

[deleted]

Re: Google Maps now requires WiFi scanning to use navigation

#310
post #86

Refusing service when the user does not consent to non-essential data sharing is illegal in the EU, and it also breaches Google Play's developer agreement. WiFi scanning is not essential to navigate with an app, and the least they could do to follow the law is to gracefully degrade the service if the user does not consent to share data about nearby devices, such as disabling traffic predictions. Of course Google's la…

I got hit with this pop-up. It is a charade, despite the UI making it feel like a technical requirement.

And here is how I know it is a charade: voice navigation and the map itself both work perfectly in the background of this undismissable pop-up.

This is the most coerced I've felt in a long time and I can't help but feel that maybe iOS users don't feel this way.

Post reply on HN