Live data from Hacker News

Ask HN: Should HN users be incentivized to use/visit newest submissions?

news.ycombinator.com

41–50 of 59 posts

Re: Ask HN: Should HN users be incentivized to use/visit newest submissions?

#41

I almost have a different issue. I feel like I miss big news here, even though I check in multiple times a day. When using the "past" menu item, there's stuff on top there I never saw on top on HN. Does thing stay shorter on top than they did before? Didn't feel it was such a problem a few years back.

I use and highly recommended https://hckrnews.com/ for this very reason. Chronological list of what’s hit the front page, and seems to have a pretty decent threshold

Re: Ask HN: Should HN users be incentivized to use/visit newest submissions?

#42
I wonder if you could come up with some incentive scheme where if you upvote something you get karma or a different set of points based on a) how early you were to the party, and b) how many upvotes things gain after you, sort of like the internet community version of a Keynesian beauty contest, or a prediction market.

This is obviously a bit convoluted and not really hashed out, but I got curious how the incentive scheme might look like.

Re: Ask HN: Should HN users be incentivized to use/visit newest submissions?

#43
Recommend against incentivizing visiting the newest submission - it would increase effectiveness of submitting content over the effectiveness of community moderation. That kind of change would empower the outsiders over the community, presumably resulting in decrease of relevance and gradual erosion of HN's local culture.

Re: Ask HN: Should HN users be incentivized to use/visit newest submissions?

#44
The current way HN works is fine for news and links etc, but for discussions i personally believe an imageboard style will work better (based on the number of replies against time), though that means that certain threads that become arguments will also be on the front page.

Re: Ask HN: Should HN users be incentivized to use/visit newest submissions?

#45
post #39
post #33

Earlier quoted context omitted.

In contrast to /asknew which is almost spam-free. Since /asknew was introduced about half a year ago (?) I have the feeling 'Ask HN' posts do reach more often the front page. This might back up your point because people seem to go to /asknew (and leaving an upvote/comment there) more often (less spammy experience).

It might be the luck of the draw but I see four pre-deaded comments in /asknew now vs five in /newest. It looks about the same, again, with the caveat it might just be a coincidence. I'll also admit I'm an unrepentant, flaming hater of Ask HN, its parents, its parents' friends and the people who owe them money.

Can you explain to me what a "pre-deaded comments" is? I haven't heard of that term before.

Also, if you don't mind, I'd be interested to hear what you have to bring against the 'Ask HN' format :) (Edit: I don't expect a long paragraph, but maybe you could indicate a general direction)

Re: Ask HN: Should HN users be incentivized to use/visit newest submissions?

#46

Enough people visit the newest page such that that around 80% of the good stuff makes it to the front page, and about 5% of the bad stuff makes it (and then is quickly flagged to death). I think it's working fine as things are now. Our information is imperfect enough as it is, even before taking into account the huge number of people trying to game the system to get their ph3r0mones to reach the front page (seriously…

Agreed, there is enough critical mass in /newest to act as a first pass filter, if there really is something interesting that falls through the cracks the moderators will put it into that second chance pool or what have you.

Also generally there isn't as much hate on resubmissions/repost as for instance in reddit. So you can simple repost if you feel that you didn't submit it at the right day of the week, timezone peak time, etc.

Re: Ask HN: Should HN users be incentivized to use/visit newest submissions?

#47

I've never succeeded in getting even a single upvote on links I submit. I've stopped bothering, there seems to be no point. It's not the quality of the links either. It just doesn't have a high chance of getting through. I've actually seen links that I submitted land to the front page a day or so later when somebody else resubmitted them. You basically need to get lucky with the right people actually looking at the n…

There's simply too many things being submitted. Hundred items per hour. Some people treat HN as a bookmark engine or something like that and submit way too much, others self-promote/spam heavily etc.

I noticed often things make it to top of HN after buzzing on Twitter for few hours; perhaps people on HN seeing stuff they already saw on Twitter are more likely to quickly upvote it without reading which lifts it to front page.

However there are a few users whose submissions I see each day on front page and I wonder how they do this.

Re: Ask HN: Should HN users be incentivized to use/visit newest submissions?

#48

Rather not, I like NH as it is. I do not want to get notified upon reactions, I do not want to be fed the latest, I do not want emotes wilder then :) What makes this site so compelling is the quality replies & discussions and the lack of anything blinking and shiny. Source: old man.

If I could suggest one concession in that a native dark mode be possible as an option.

FYI Chrome Canary has a "dark mode for websites" in incubator. It allows you to darken every website. On mobile it works very well on HN; the desktop exp doesn't have UI affordances yet though.

It's also in stable (incl. forks like Brave) behind chrome://flags -> search "dark"

Re: Ask HN: Should HN users be incentivized to use/visit newest submissions?

#49

I've never succeeded in getting even a single upvote on links I submit. I've stopped bothering, there seems to be no point. It's not the quality of the links either. It just doesn't have a high chance of getting through. I've actually seen links that I submitted land to the front page a day or so later when somebody else resubmitted them. You basically need to get lucky with the right people actually looking at the n…

One interesting enhancement that would help with that and that also addresses the problem of duplicates is to simply count duplicate link submissions as an upvote on the original.

That's how it works now. For example, I just submitted the URL for https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=30160524, and now it's on 2 points with no 'upvote' button next to the link for me.

Post reply on HN