Quoted post unavailable.
It was a criminal state violating human rights back then, and it is a human rights violation today.
51–60 of 484 posts
Quoted post unavailable.
It was a criminal state violating human rights back then, and it is a human rights violation today.
Like McCarthyism it’s a noble cause, but I can’t help but wonder if these initiatives rather tend to be outsmarted by the real spies. People who are accidentally incriminated by clerical errors and misunderstandings are much lower hanging fruit.
> Like McCarthyism it’s a noble cause I'm unsure if this is sarcasm or not.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Agreed. It seems like the details matter here. Were the affiliations suspect but not reportable? Or were the affiliations unremarkable and not reportable but prosecutors screwed up?
> were the affiliations unremarkable and not reportable but prosecutors screwed up? Yes, the prosecutors royally screwed up. From the article: "Prosecutors had floated the idea of a deferred prosecution agreement, which would have allowed him to return to work and apply for government grants in the future. In return, said his lawyer, Mr. Fisher, he would have to admit to having some ties to China, none of them a viol…
Earlier quoted context omitted.
> Like McCarthyism it’s a noble cause I'm unsure if this is sarcasm or not.
It’s not. Why on earth would you want to have a bunch of Soviet or communist Chinese spies running around?
You seem to have internalised this logic, since you're assuming all communists are spies for another nation.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
> Like McCarthyism it’s a noble cause I'm unsure if this is sarcasm or not.
It’s not. Why on earth would you want to have a bunch of Soviet or communist Chinese spies running around?
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Agreed. It seems like the details matter here. Were the affiliations suspect but not reportable? Or were the affiliations unremarkable and not reportable but prosecutors screwed up?
> were the affiliations unremarkable and not reportable but prosecutors screwed up? Yes, the prosecutors royally screwed up. From the article: "Prosecutors had floated the idea of a deferred prosecution agreement, which would have allowed him to return to work and apply for government grants in the future. In return, said his lawyer, Mr. Fisher, he would have to admit to having some ties to China, none of them a viol…
Quoted post unavailable.
We cannot marginalize segments of our population based on race, nationality, religion, sex, etc. and expect to remain competitive. This is a basic truth of economics. And it's also wrong to do that to people in the first place. Americans are Americans and we all should be treated equally by our government.
I am curious and you obviously do not need to answer, but in an effort for a fair and honest conversation and your seeing racism in this story, do you identify as a visible minority?
I think he was targeted upon returning from China when he refused to turn over device passwords to the DHS agents (Who could have been racist but are definitely authoritarian).
Don't get me wrong this whole situation rings heavily of McCarthyism and worse the offer to confess or take a deal is a disgusting practice that has destroyed many young (Black) men's lives under the guise of justice being served. There is a history of the state making the threat that not confessing's result will be so bad that deals were made and those deals had life long consequences that changed and continue to change the trajectory of lives that otherwise had great potential if not for a corrupt legal system.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
I've worked in Academia. There are so many Chinese scientists. Trust me that's not a problem in the least.
So we should make it a problem?
> Prosecutors announced that they had received new information indicating that Dr. Chen had not been obliged to disclose those affiliations, undercutting the basis of the case.
In either case I believe ties to China are harmful, they are not a friendly country.