It's painfully obvious OP is talking about a smart phone and a vax passport. You don't have to be "anti-vax" (which is a stupid stupid term) to be anti-vax-passport. The people pushing for vax passports have no clue what they are unleashing. It is absolutely fascist, evil and incredibly surprising to me that 99% of the people on this website are in 100% favor of it. EVIL.
[flagged]
The window to deploy surveillance-resistant systems is running out
101–110 of 330 posts
Re: The window to deploy surveillance-resistant systems is running out
#102Earlier quoted context omitted.
Oh yeah, I'm aware. My hopes aren't placed in Europe, I live in Moscow :) It is fascinating that the topic seems to get so little thought in Europe though.
Moscow is in Europe my friend. I guess this is like the Brits who talk about “Europe” as if it was a separate place even though they can literally drive to France.
Well, if you're going to get all pedantic, Moscow is actually in Asia.
Re: The window to deploy surveillance-resistant systems is running out
#103Re: The window to deploy surveillance-resistant systems is running out
#104Earlier quoted context omitted.
The TV show Upload [1] has a group of people dubbed the "Ludds" (i.e. Luddites) that refuse to be party to the turn that the technological revolution has taken and stick to traditional ways of doing things. I strongly believe if that were to happen in our world today, much of Silicon Valley would be "Ludds", while a mass of non-tech people would happily welcome our new technological overlords. [1]: https://www.imdb.c…
In times of frustration with the modern Internet, I've often sympathized with the Amish. For those unfamiliar, the Amish are a religious-society that avoid the conveniences of modern technology. They live in houses without electricity, and travel by in horse and buggy. It's sort of like they hit a point in history and saw where the world was going and decided, "nah, we're ok, we like how things are now." When frustra…
Re: The window to deploy surveillance-resistant systems is running out
#105Earlier quoted context omitted.
This fills me with dread, resentment and anger. I wanted a future where I would be the master of technology, and what I am getting instead is more of the "I can't let you do this, Dave" vibe. I want to live in a community of individuals, not be subjugated to whatever happens to feed the anxieties and neuroses of society. Is there... will there be a way to resist this obscenity?
> not be subjugated to whatever happens to feed the anxieties and neuroses of society. That’s awfully vague. Are specters doing this to you? Seems that some power analysis is in order.
Re: The window to deploy surveillance-resistant systems is running out
#106Earlier quoted context omitted.
> much of Silicon Valley would be "Ludds" Bullshit. Much of Silicon Valley likes to think they would be Ludds but they do so while hailing an Uber from their iPhone and hoping that their DoorDash is devlivered on time so they can eat while they watch a HBO Max show and they hope that nobody stole their Amazon Prime package.
I think it applies more along the lines of "free" products where "you are the product" comes into play. It may entirely be biased based on who I know, but I know more tech people who refuse to have a Facebook because of tracking than I do non-tech people.
Re: The window to deploy surveillance-resistant systems is running out
#107Re: The window to deploy surveillance-resistant systems is running out
#108Earlier quoted context omitted.
Moscow is in Europe my friend. I guess this is like the Brits who talk about “Europe” as if it was a separate place even though they can literally drive to France.
> Moscow is in Europe my friend Well, if you're going to get all pedantic, Moscow is actually in Asia.
If you want to be pedantic.
Re: The window to deploy surveillance-resistant systems is running out
#109I'm sorry, what is the context of this tweet? I don't read the news a lot, I apologize. Why the urgency?
Re: The window to deploy surveillance-resistant systems is running out
#110Earlier quoted context omitted.
> I'm using "Europe" largely in the sense of "influence sphere of EU/Germany". So say that.
It's close enough to what people generally mean when they say Europe. I consider Norway to be part of Europe, for instance, and I'm a Norwegian. Although there are certainly subtle distinctions; Norway has a higher degree of North-Atlantic cultural heritage, has economic interests that contrast with those of continental Europe and aren't formally part of the EU. You could make similar remarks for many countries that…