Live data from Hacker News

Nature Neuroscience offers open access publishing for $11k per article

nature.com

161–170 of 213 posts

Re: Nature Neuroscience offers open access publishing for $11k per article

#161
post #43

Earlier quoted context omitted.

"Most journals already allow authors to distribute copies by request." Does anyone know how this works in practice ? I'd like to ask a few of my favorite researchers for a copy of their papers but I am a hobbyist and don't want to take their time and add to their likely overflowing inbox. BTW, "this is nuts" isn't a claim you can make if you don't know the answer to questions you posted. From their website: "an artic…

Peer reviewers are all volunteers, the journal only pays the staff that coordinate the reviews- email a bunch of people and ask if they'll do a review (and often that's semi-automated now), and the editor that makes the decision after looking briefly at the feedback from the reviewers. The editors don't actually even do any proofreading or anything like that anymore, they just make executive decisions as to what arti…

This is your experience with nature neuroscience? I doubt it

Re: Nature Neuroscience offers open access publishing for $11k per article

#162

Let’s stop reviewing for publishers that profit from research! Join the strike! https://josephpcohen.com/w/reviewerstrike/

To be honest, it is a bit naive to think people will boycott one of the most prestigious journal in their field for this reason

Re: Nature Neuroscience offers open access publishing for $11k per article

#164
post #137

I’ve never quite understood the hate against journals. Sure, they might be charging too much for subscriptions based on the effort, but plenty of products do that. My understanding of positions are: Researcher: I want to publish in your journal because it’s prestigious. Academia: You better publish in prestigious journals or you won’t get tenure. Journal: My journal is expensive, but very prestigious. Researcher: I w…

The current shareholders and editors of the prestigious journals contribute nothing to it being prestigious. It is historical accident and network effects that now let some journals charge $10k for $100 of work, which many rightly perceive as unjust profiteering. Moving away from Elsevier and Springer Nature is a coordination problem just as difficult and just as desireable as moving everyone in your school off Whats…

It's a bit naive to think the editors of these journal don't contribute.

Re: Nature Neuroscience offers open access publishing for $11k per article

#165
post #137

I’ve never quite understood the hate against journals. Sure, they might be charging too much for subscriptions based on the effort, but plenty of products do that. My understanding of positions are: Researcher: I want to publish in your journal because it’s prestigious. Academia: You better publish in prestigious journals or you won’t get tenure. Journal: My journal is expensive, but very prestigious. Researcher: I w…

The current shareholders and editors of the prestigious journals contribute nothing to it being prestigious. It is historical accident and network effects that now let some journals charge $10k for $100 of work, which many rightly perceive as unjust profiteering. Moving away from Elsevier and Springer Nature is a coordination problem just as difficult and just as desireable as moving everyone in your school off Whats…

I actually think these fees are an easy problem to solve, but they can’t be solved by academics themselves due to the incentives (i.e. publishing in these journals plays a big role in promotions and possible future grants being awarded).

If funding agencies capped grant publishing fees at say $250 per article, while still requiring open access, that would be the end of these insane page charges. The journals would have to adapt. No one is paying $11,000 out of pocket to publish in these journals…

Re: Nature Neuroscience offers open access publishing for $11k per article

#166
post #98

Lot of people in the comments here don't understand the Open Access funding model. Please read: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Open_access

Or people fully understand that the bulk of the work that goes into a journal is done by unpaid volunteers and are appalled at the sticker price.

Are they angry that someone volunteered?

Re: Nature Neuroscience offers open access publishing for $11k per article

#167
post #95

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Why? I hope this isn't a critique of the form "Why does Dropbox have 3,000 employees, I could build it in a weekend." There are a lot of costs to producing an issue of Nature.

The bulk of the heavy lifting for any scholarly journal is done by unpaid volunteers. JOSS calculates their cost of publishing a paper at around $100. What additional expenses does Nature incur that justify charging two orders of magnitude more? https://blog.joss.theoj.org/2019/06/cost-models-for-running-...

What you said might or might not be true for those journals with volunteer editor. Nature, Science, and Cell they all have quite a few journals with hired editors, and the editorial process is quite different between those.

Re: Nature Neuroscience offers open access publishing for $11k per article

#168
post #87
post #7

https://blog.joss.theoj.org/2019/06/cost-models-for-running-... "The Journal of Open Source Software (JOSS) is a free, open-access online journal, with no article processing charge (APC). We are committed to operating as a free service to our community, and we do so thanks to the volunteer labor of editors and reviewers, and by taking advantage of existing infrastructure. In this post, we examine the true costs of ru…

In Machine Learning the top journal JMLR is also completely free and open access. Nature tried to introduce a machine learning journal but it is being boycotted by many researchers.

But not all! In fact lots of people, to my surprise, are publishing in Nature: Machine Intelligence

Re: Nature Neuroscience offers open access publishing for $11k per article

#169
post #63

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Whenever I speak at a tech event, my attendance cost is free. (I'm still on the hook for flight and hotel, usually.)

Those events usually aren't the ones where most of the attendees are presenting, though sometimes things like Bar Camps can get the venue etc. sponsored. Finding sponsors to foot the bill can be harder for conferences for academics who aren't interested in leaving their tenure-track position to configure Kubernetes at a hot new Uber for Guinea Pigs startup. Still, church picnics, potluck dinners, and wedding parties…

I like your style. We should start StateFairCon someday

Re: Nature Neuroscience offers open access publishing for $11k per article

#170
post #137

I’ve never quite understood the hate against journals. Sure, they might be charging too much for subscriptions based on the effort, but plenty of products do that. My understanding of positions are: Researcher: I want to publish in your journal because it’s prestigious. Academia: You better publish in prestigious journals or you won’t get tenure. Journal: My journal is expensive, but very prestigious. Researcher: I w…

The current shareholders and editors of the prestigious journals contribute nothing to it being prestigious. It is historical accident and network effects that now let some journals charge $10k for $100 of work, which many rightly perceive as unjust profiteering. Moving away from Elsevier and Springer Nature is a coordination problem just as difficult and just as desireable as moving everyone in your school off Whats…

I’m not sure shareholders contribute anything to companies other than capital, so your point doesn’t make sense.

The editors most certainly contribute to prestige. You don’t get big name editors unless you matter.

And the prestige isn’t guaranteed. Several journals that were prestigious when I was a grad student no longer are.

So I reiterate my point, the journals provide something of value, people just don’t like the price.

Post reply on HN