Earlier quoted context omitted.
"Most journals already allow authors to distribute copies by request." Does anyone know how this works in practice ? I'd like to ask a few of my favorite researchers for a copy of their papers but I am a hobbyist and don't want to take their time and add to their likely overflowing inbox. BTW, "this is nuts" isn't a claim you can make if you don't know the answer to questions you posted. From their website: "an artic…
Peer reviewers are all volunteers, the journal only pays the staff that coordinate the reviews- email a bunch of people and ask if they'll do a review (and often that's semi-automated now), and the editor that makes the decision after looking briefly at the feedback from the reviewers. The editors don't actually even do any proofreading or anything like that anymore, they just make executive decisions as to what arti…
Nature Neuroscience offers open access publishing for $11k per article
161–170 of 213 posts
Re: Nature Neuroscience offers open access publishing for $11k per article
#162Let’s stop reviewing for publishers that profit from research! Join the strike! https://josephpcohen.com/w/reviewerstrike/
Re: Nature Neuroscience offers open access publishing for $11k per article
#163Re: Nature Neuroscience offers open access publishing for $11k per article
#164I’ve never quite understood the hate against journals. Sure, they might be charging too much for subscriptions based on the effort, but plenty of products do that. My understanding of positions are: Researcher: I want to publish in your journal because it’s prestigious. Academia: You better publish in prestigious journals or you won’t get tenure. Journal: My journal is expensive, but very prestigious. Researcher: I w…
The current shareholders and editors of the prestigious journals contribute nothing to it being prestigious. It is historical accident and network effects that now let some journals charge $10k for $100 of work, which many rightly perceive as unjust profiteering. Moving away from Elsevier and Springer Nature is a coordination problem just as difficult and just as desireable as moving everyone in your school off Whats…
Re: Nature Neuroscience offers open access publishing for $11k per article
#165I’ve never quite understood the hate against journals. Sure, they might be charging too much for subscriptions based on the effort, but plenty of products do that. My understanding of positions are: Researcher: I want to publish in your journal because it’s prestigious. Academia: You better publish in prestigious journals or you won’t get tenure. Journal: My journal is expensive, but very prestigious. Researcher: I w…
The current shareholders and editors of the prestigious journals contribute nothing to it being prestigious. It is historical accident and network effects that now let some journals charge $10k for $100 of work, which many rightly perceive as unjust profiteering. Moving away from Elsevier and Springer Nature is a coordination problem just as difficult and just as desireable as moving everyone in your school off Whats…
If funding agencies capped grant publishing fees at say $250 per article, while still requiring open access, that would be the end of these insane page charges. The journals would have to adapt. No one is paying $11,000 out of pocket to publish in these journals…
Re: Nature Neuroscience offers open access publishing for $11k per article
#166Lot of people in the comments here don't understand the Open Access funding model. Please read: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Open_access
Or people fully understand that the bulk of the work that goes into a journal is done by unpaid volunteers and are appalled at the sticker price.
Re: Nature Neuroscience offers open access publishing for $11k per article
#167Earlier quoted context omitted.
Why? I hope this isn't a critique of the form "Why does Dropbox have 3,000 employees, I could build it in a weekend." There are a lot of costs to producing an issue of Nature.
The bulk of the heavy lifting for any scholarly journal is done by unpaid volunteers. JOSS calculates their cost of publishing a paper at around $100. What additional expenses does Nature incur that justify charging two orders of magnitude more? https://blog.joss.theoj.org/2019/06/cost-models-for-running-...
Re: Nature Neuroscience offers open access publishing for $11k per article
#168https://blog.joss.theoj.org/2019/06/cost-models-for-running-... "The Journal of Open Source Software (JOSS) is a free, open-access online journal, with no article processing charge (APC). We are committed to operating as a free service to our community, and we do so thanks to the volunteer labor of editors and reviewers, and by taking advantage of existing infrastructure. In this post, we examine the true costs of ru…
In Machine Learning the top journal JMLR is also completely free and open access. Nature tried to introduce a machine learning journal but it is being boycotted by many researchers.
Re: Nature Neuroscience offers open access publishing for $11k per article
#169Earlier quoted context omitted.
Whenever I speak at a tech event, my attendance cost is free. (I'm still on the hook for flight and hotel, usually.)
Those events usually aren't the ones where most of the attendees are presenting, though sometimes things like Bar Camps can get the venue etc. sponsored. Finding sponsors to foot the bill can be harder for conferences for academics who aren't interested in leaving their tenure-track position to configure Kubernetes at a hot new Uber for Guinea Pigs startup. Still, church picnics, potluck dinners, and wedding parties…
Re: Nature Neuroscience offers open access publishing for $11k per article
#170I’ve never quite understood the hate against journals. Sure, they might be charging too much for subscriptions based on the effort, but plenty of products do that. My understanding of positions are: Researcher: I want to publish in your journal because it’s prestigious. Academia: You better publish in prestigious journals or you won’t get tenure. Journal: My journal is expensive, but very prestigious. Researcher: I w…
The current shareholders and editors of the prestigious journals contribute nothing to it being prestigious. It is historical accident and network effects that now let some journals charge $10k for $100 of work, which many rightly perceive as unjust profiteering. Moving away from Elsevier and Springer Nature is a coordination problem just as difficult and just as desireable as moving everyone in your school off Whats…
The editors most certainly contribute to prestige. You don’t get big name editors unless you matter.
And the prestige isn’t guaranteed. Several journals that were prestigious when I was a grad student no longer are.
So I reiterate my point, the journals provide something of value, people just don’t like the price.