> In fact it was a superior there that told me, when I was more anti-union, that "companies get the union they deserve".
What does that say about the companies that don't have a union?
> I did everything I could to get my wife into a professional career with a union, so that when I die she'll be as safe and protected without me.
The safer option is to make sure she has a skillset which is in high demand.
What's the union going to do if her company goes under?
> I also think unions would help the world, while I'm certainly not overpaid myself, my Indian colleagues deserve the same pay I receive. I'd strike for that.
Different places have different costs of living. That's the competitive advantage of people in poor countries. Have you considered that if the company had to pay them the same as they pay you, they might have hired entirely workers who are in the same timezone? Much to the chagrin of the people you thought you were helping.
> Big corps keep out competition too easily, and should be doing more to keep the American middle class around.
Big corps should be broken up. That's the solution there.