Earlier quoted context omitted.
> Personally I had hoped that the entire pandemic would have gone away once vaccines became available, but that hope was clearly misplaced Where did you get that hope from? You said the information you were getting did not provide that hope, that it set expectations to what they are. If you didn’t get that idea from the authorities touting the vaccine…where did you get it? Likely it was the assumption that these vacc…
> If you didn’t get that idea from the authorities touting the vaccine…where did you get it? It was optimism. I was hoping that the strains wouldn't evolve so quickly. My optimism was misplaced. > Likely it was the assumption that these vaccines would work like all the others. Ignoring the methods (e.g. mrna), this vaccine _does_ work like all the others. It increases the likelihood that your body will be able to suc…
No, I simply trusted in the advertised protection against Covid infection by the mRNA vaccines would exceed 90%, I was hopeful that if I was one of the unlucky 10% to contract it, that the case would be mild. I was trusting what we were being told. When the reality set in, so did skepticism. Optimism to realism.
https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/vaccines/different...
“Based on evidence from clinical trials, in people ages 18 years and older, the Moderna COVID-19 vaccine was 94.1% effective at preventing laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 infection in people who received two doses and had no evidence of being previously infected.”
I guess I don’t understand someone who claims they knew that the vaccines would not be effective in stopping the spread of the virus, but were still optimistic and hopeful that the vaccines would end the pandemic. You generally don’t go from realism to optimism. It’s usually the other way around.