Live data from Hacker News

California Considers Doubling Its Taxes

taxfoundation.org

181–190 of 363 posts

Re: California Considers Doubling Its Taxes

#181

Thank you California! I now know where I will be spending the years of my life when I have no income and insanely high medical bills. Gonna stick in PA with our 3.07% while I am earning bank and healthy though.

That's really why states can't do universal healthcare on their own. It is too easy to move between states to find the best deal.

Re: California Considers Doubling Its Taxes

#182
post #161

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Typical the argument is that a single payer system is to avoid waste. California Government would be the perfect candidate for this since they are so fiscally responsible and do such an amazing job managing their finances. God Speed.

California had a $75 billion surplus last year.

That in itself is not a signal of responsibility. You could have increased revenues or cut the wrong programs.

Re: California Considers Doubling Its Taxes

#183
post #129
post #34

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Why do you believe single-payer is a bad idea? The model works very well in most European countries.

Most european countries have fewer poor people by percentage than the USA. Single payer "works" in europe in the sense that you still end up having to pay out of pocket if you want not-crap (private) care.

I don't see how anyone is worse off in that system?

It's a huge step up for everyone that is unemployed or on crappy minimum-wage insurance. Even if it's "only" on par with the worst of the US system, it still grants you the freedom to switch jobs and a better negotiating position for other benefits. And everyone that has better insurance can presumably just pay out of pocket to get better-than-minimum.

Re: California Considers Doubling Its Taxes

#184

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> my actual change is net zero, in most cases It's designed to be a progressive system, unlike current health insurance, so almost nobody's change will be net zero, even assuming the cost of providing the service is the same (which, who knows). Low-income earners can probably expect to pay considerably less, and high-income earners can expect to pay considerably more; only people right at the crossover point would ex…

Even better, on average it will be net zero. Since some high earners skew the average considerably, it will be net positive for a significant majority of taxpayers.

Well sure it's better for most taxpayers, since it'll be a proportion of income the higher paid person will be paying for their own and a dozen others' healthcare.

Re: California Considers Doubling Its Taxes

#185

I am US Citizen living in CA, while also have lived (and am citizen) of other 3 countries, Canada as one prior to US. To remind all, Michael Moore's Sicko documentary is huge misrepresentation of how good socialized HC is, while it did point huge issues with the current privatized/greed-based private US HC with crooked HC+insurance industry. So as not all is BW, from my experience with Canadian HC, socialization of t…

You are totally right, I've also heard the same thing from the many Canadians I've been friends with over the years as well as my family in the UK.

I don't know if most people realize it, but there is definitely a tradeoff between 100% equal access and quality. But it does seem that's a tradeoff that many people want to make so idk

Re: California Considers Doubling Its Taxes

#186
post #155

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I pay $1.3k/month for private insurance for myself + my husband, so it would be an easy yes vote for me.

I pay less than half of that. So in effect you’re seeking to drive up my costs in order to drive yours down. I can at least understand why you would want to, but I won’t be your ally.

Do you mean less than one quarter of that? Parent is paying for two, and it looks like you are paying for one?

Re: California Considers Doubling Its Taxes

#187
Build caves and tunnel houses in the mountains for the poor to live in and bullet trains to the valley and the deserts. Rich people want to live on the coast and they will pay to keep the poor out. That won't change, let's accept reality and fix root causes. More housing and development. More investment in water security!

Re: California Considers Doubling Its Taxes

#188

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Except UK is a disaster, 6M people waiting for service. Some longer than a year. Heartbreaking stories if you are paying attention.

How many millions are waiting in the US because they can't afford care?

The solution to a problem that is not working as well as you'd like is not to jump into a system that's working even worse.

Re: California Considers Doubling Its Taxes

#189

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It’s the preexisting injury part that jacked up the prices. They aren’t allowed to deny enrollment or charge significantly higher premiums if some was has cancer or something. And that totally makes sense morally, but that causes the risk burden to be offset on the aggregate of the subscribers resulting in higher premiums for everyone. It would be kind of similar to forcing auto insurance carriers to afford coverage…

I've NEVER seen an employee denied (or asked) about their medical conditions ever. The enrollment paperwork to the carrier is like basic address / name / effective date for coverage. That is it.

The ACA prohibits pre-existing condition exclusions for all insurance plans, not just Obamacare plans.

Re: California Considers Doubling Its Taxes

#190

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> Y'all actually have one of the best systems in the world, Germany has more ICU beds than the US.

> Germany has more ICU beds than the US. That would be shocking if true, which it does not appear to be. Germany has around 32K ICU beds. US has around 96K ICU beds. Germany has slightly more per-capita than the US. (387 vs 294 per million inhabitants) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_hospital_...

To be fair per capita is the only relevant comparison.
Post reply on HN