Live data from Hacker News

Russia sends troops to Kazakhstan to put down deadly uprising

reuters.com

81–90 of 330 posts

Re: Russia sends troops to Kazakhstan to put down deadly uprising

#81
post #57

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> But why is such a dysfunctional dictatorship so stable? (...) I believe the answer is: it is backed by the West because a stable dictator in Kazakhstan and Azerbaijan guarantees the oil flow. And yet, it's Russia and it's strong-arm tactics that are desperately trying to keep Kazakhstan's regime in power. Think about it: Russia is even sending it's paratroopers to Kazakhstan to stomp out unrest. Not the US. Not the…

Do you assume Putin and western corporations are antagonistic? Putin is just closest strong arm and most appropriate politically.

> Do you assume Putin and western corporations are antagonistic?

Please don't try to change the subject. Putin sent Russia's paratroopers to Kazakhstan to use them against Kazakhstan's civilian population to quelsh unrest. It's not the US, Switzerland, Finland, the EU, nothing. This is Russia intervening in Kazakhstan to preserve Russia's interests, and no amount of whataboutism changes this.

Re: Russia sends troops to Kazakhstan to put down deadly uprising

#82
post #57

I traveled many post-Soviet countries in the past years with my old camping car. My personal impressions in Kazakhstan were frightening. A deeply corrupt state, much worse than Russia. Aggressive armed bandits in police uniform tried to rob me several times. Kazakhstan is true mafia state where every part of the regime tries to enrich itself at the expanse of the people. In contrast to the rich oil elite there are th…

> But why is such a dysfunctional dictatorship so stable? (...) I believe the answer is: it is backed by the West because a stable dictator in Kazakhstan and Azerbaijan guarantees the oil flow. And yet, it's Russia and it's strong-arm tactics that are desperately trying to keep Kazakhstan's regime in power. Think about it: Russia is even sending it's paratroopers to Kazakhstan to stomp out unrest. Not the US. Not the…

What makes you feel that economic interests are always the same as political interests? Why doesn't Russia kill all its Sturgeon so American Royalty can't eat Russian caviar?

Maybe things are not as simple as Fox News makes them.

Re: Russia sends troops to Kazakhstan to put down deadly uprising

#83

Earlier quoted context omitted.

"Backed by the west" is a common conspiracy theory pushed by Russian government. You should be asking yourself who's benefiting. The west does not benefit from anything related to those states, all oil they produce first flows through Russia. Russia benefits by having these states as basically feudal subservient states that they can extort for profit. (I will note that most western oil comes from the middle east with…

Kazakh elite keeps its money in western banks, flies western planes to western capitals and owns land and property in top western locations. Same for Russian elite. In the Cold War, dealing with Soviets was unthinkable. Now, the West is complacent, there is even a term for it, Schröderizatsiya. See this opinion piece by the former Estonian president [1]. [1] https://news.err.ee/1608362130/toomas-hendrik-ilves-alexei-…

What’s the alternative, Sanctions?

What about China, should they be sanctioned too?

[Many make the claim that sanctions mostly affect civilians so for example are against Iran Sanctions, etc.]

Re: Russia sends troops to Kazakhstan to put down deadly uprising

#84
post #81

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Do you assume Putin and western corporations are antagonistic? Putin is just closest strong arm and most appropriate politically.

> Do you assume Putin and western corporations are antagonistic? Please don't try to change the subject. Putin sent Russia's paratroopers to Kazakhstan to use them against Kazakhstan's civilian population to quelsh unrest. It's not the US, Switzerland, Finland, the EU, nothing. This is Russia intervening in Kazakhstan to preserve Russia's interests, and no amount of whataboutism changes this.

Russia's interests are aligned with western companies interests that buy Russian exports.

Also I'm not changing the subject because we have a whole branching forum here, not a single coversation that can talk only about one thing at a time.

If you are not interested in that branch of the discussion simply skip it.

Re: Russia sends troops to Kazakhstan to put down deadly uprising

#85
post #37

My own experience in Kazakhstan a few years ago was amazing — kind, generous people. I had the most surreal (but standard) Russian Bath experience: sitting with a bunch of naked folks as they self-flog with branches in rooms so hot you needed wool caps to keep the top of your head from singeing. When I was getting dressed a huge guy next to me said something in Russian, I was certain I had committed some bath faux pa…

Being Eastern European, I can attest to the fact that this kindness and generosity (poorly abstracted as being passionate about things) has a flip side, and you don’t want to be on the opposite side of this treatment.

> you don’t want to be on the opposite side of this treatment.

How high is the risk, if you make an effort to behave well?

Re: Russia sends troops to Kazakhstan to put down deadly uprising

#86
post #57

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> But why is such a dysfunctional dictatorship so stable? (...) I believe the answer is: it is backed by the West because a stable dictator in Kazakhstan and Azerbaijan guarantees the oil flow. And yet, it's Russia and it's strong-arm tactics that are desperately trying to keep Kazakhstan's regime in power. Think about it: Russia is even sending it's paratroopers to Kazakhstan to stomp out unrest. Not the US. Not the…

What makes you feel that economic interests are always the same as political interests? Why doesn't Russia kill all its Sturgeon so American Royalty can't eat Russian caviar? Maybe things are not as simple as Fox News makes them.

Russians also like caviar. I'm sure it's served in the Kremlin.

Re: Russia sends troops to Kazakhstan to put down deadly uprising

#88
post #37

My own experience in Kazakhstan a few years ago was amazing — kind, generous people. I had the most surreal (but standard) Russian Bath experience: sitting with a bunch of naked folks as they self-flog with branches in rooms so hot you needed wool caps to keep the top of your head from singeing. When I was getting dressed a huge guy next to me said something in Russian, I was certain I had committed some bath faux pa…

Reading and watching about these places on YouTube (BaldAndBankrupt) and recently numerous videos about Pakistan, Afghanistan, India. I can't help but feel modern Western society has lost and forgotten something within. It's hard to describe but easier described as nearest to changes in warmth and compassion. It's only getting worse and these old places it seems ingrained.

It's never been that peaceful in the world. The thing that has changed is media reports from all over the world.

Re: Russia sends troops to Kazakhstan to put down deadly uprising

#89
post #85

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Being Eastern European, I can attest to the fact that this kindness and generosity (poorly abstracted as being passionate about things) has a flip side, and you don’t want to be on the opposite side of this treatment.

> you don’t want to be on the opposite side of this treatment. How high is the risk, if you make an effort to behave well?

Low, but it’s quite a skill. Referenced here “bald and bankrupt” is an expert in “behaving well”, I am still amazed by his skills to be honest

Re: Russia sends troops to Kazakhstan to put down deadly uprising

#90
post #11

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It's very weird to see the President argue 'foreign interests' spark the unrest, and then promptly invites a foreign army to quell it. Who's falling for that?

Foreign army in this context is just using a treaty you signed with an ally to request assistance. It’s as “foreign” as any NATO country’s army to another.

Assistance against their own people. That's a big "nope".

Using the military against one's own people is already a "nope", getting foreign assistance sounds exactly like a foreign invasion.

Post reply on HN