Live data from Hacker News

We handle 80TB and 5M page views a month for under $400

blog.polyhaven.com

111–120 of 426 posts

Re: We handle 80TB and 5M page views a month for under $400

#111
post #69

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Ever since MacOS broke Gimp I use Photopea regularly! Fantastic site!

Please tell more about this ‘MacOS broke Gimp’ thing, because it's the first time I hear of that and I'd like to dodge a firsthand experience.

In November 2020, Gimp 2.10.14 didn't work well or at all on Big Sur. The issues got workarounds and bugfixes, but there are still complaints about performance. https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gimp/-/issues/5917

Re: We handle 80TB and 5M page views a month for under $400

#112
post #71

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I used it successfully on my Mac last week. It's still GIMP (bleh!) but it works.

You can consider Affinity Photo

All of the Affinity products are top notch. I wanted a simple vector tool and ended up liking Affinity Designer so much I picked up a course to learn it more in-depth. The best part is their pricing model doesn't suck, so I'm happy to pay for their wares.

Re: We handle 80TB and 5M page views a month for under $400

#113

I often wonder why so many companies seem to spend tens of thousands of dollars per month on AWS services for their hosting. If most web apps nowadays are just CRUD apps, then why would you need to spend more than €300/month on hosting? All you'd need is data and the website itself, right? I'm currently clicking through various European hosting services and they seem to offer great dedicated servers at good prices. I…

Until you're spending the salary of a large fraction of your engineers on hosting costs, there are much bigger things to worry about than hosting costs. AWS is user friendly and a lot of engineers are familiar with it, so developer productivity is strongly in its favor.

Also, you know what you're getting security-wise with AWS, and no one will blame you when your website / service goes down because AWS is down.

Re: We handle 80TB and 5M page views a month for under $400

#114

Uh, so how does cloudflare do it, since the answer is basically "cloudflare". They have sweet deals with the cloud providers?

The biggest costs of server bandwidth are due to transmitting data over large distances (since the internet backbone operates on a sender-pays model when unbalanced traffic is involved in peering). By locating CDN nodes globally, Cloudflare can ensure data is sent near the last mile and thus inexpensive to send. Unless ISPs decide to shake it down the way they do with Netflix of course.

Re: We handle 80TB and 5M page views a month for under $400

#115
post #10

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Cloudflare is currently operating at a close to break-even loss.

Sure, because we're hiring like crazy to build new things. As we said during our last earnings call, we intend to stay at break even as long as we can achieve extraordinary revenue growth and continue to deliver innovative new products. The more relevant number for this comparison would be our gross margin — much we have to spend on things like bandwidth and servers to service our customers divided by the revenue tho…

I love HN and it’s always amazing to see the founders answer the questions themselves and most importantly care a lot about the product.

Re: We handle 80TB and 5M page views a month for under $400

#116
post #110

> But, we can get around that because of a partnership between Backblaze and Cloudflare they call the Bandwidth Alliance. This reads like a paid marketing post for Cloudflare. It's astonishing how many times the author conflates browser cache-able assets with cached assets on a CDN. When a browser downloads a static asset if the web server is configured properly those files will be cached and there won't be a need to…

I didn’t see it as an ad for Cloudflare unless I also then consider every single post about AWS in last 10 years on HN as ads.

If anything, I’m fine with a new competitor to BigCloud that’s been unchecked and increasingly hostile (cost-wise).

Re: We handle 80TB and 5M page views a month for under $400

#117

If you are worried about getting your blog post to the top of Reddit or Hacker News (I've never been there myself); you can have a very modest web server or even a pay per request serverless sort of thing and pay $20 real quick to Cloudflare if you happen to get popular. It's the Bart Simpson method of highly scalability[0], for static content you can have global datacenter coverage in a couple minutes or so if you u…

Is there a good service to do this automatically (my site uses DigitalOcean and CloudFlare free), or even test how much load you can handle?

I tend not to realise when my site goes viral, as I'm based in Australia whereas my largest audience is in b the US (and I'm a bit of a Luddite!)

Post reply on HN