Oh, then you will love DimethylMercury https://youtu.be/h049Hgfk-BI
Curiously, the MSDS indicates SilverShield gloves but does not specifically call out latex gloves as permeable and counter-indicated. This seems like a disastrous error of omission. https://fscimage.fishersci.com/msds/99021.htm
Things I Won't Work With: Dioxygen Difluoride (2010)
61–70 of 79 posts
Re: Things I Won't Work With: Dioxygen Difluoride (2010)
#62My personal favorite article from Derek Lowe about a chemical that isn't actually all that dangerous... but you still likely don't want it around. https://www.science.org/content/blog-post/things-i-won-t-wor...
I'm surprised something so potent was never used as a chemical weapon. Sounds like it could easily clear out a trench or riot in the streets.
Re: Things I Won't Work With: Dioxygen Difluoride (2010)
#63My personal favorite article from Derek Lowe about a chemical that isn't actually all that dangerous... but you still likely don't want it around. https://www.science.org/content/blog-post/things-i-won-t-wor...
Goddammit now I really want some of this, just to see how bad it is.
Re: Things I Won't Work With: Dioxygen Difluoride (2010)
#64Earlier quoted context omitted.
I think my favorite from the series is this one, about a high-nitrogen compound so wildly unstable that it detonated when the lab turned on the spectrometer: https://www.science.org/content/blog-post/things-i-won-t-wor...
There's a great video on producing and testing that substance: https://youtu.be/-Sz4d7RQB6Y Interestingly, it's more stable than most online sources give it credit for
Re: Things I Won't Work With: Dioxygen Difluoride (2010)
#65Previously (x8) https://hn.algolia.com/?dateRange=all&page=0&prefix=true&que...
Recipes about Satan’s Kimchi are irresistible.
Re: Things I Won't Work With: Dioxygen Difluoride (2010)
#66Previously (x8) https://hn.algolia.com/?dateRange=all&page=0&prefix=true&que...
It's really, really good. Short but well-written. The one on chlorine trifluoride (linked in OP, but fixed link) is also really good: https://www.science.org/content/blog-post/sand-won-t-save-yo...
Fantastic! I can see where Derek Lowe got his writing style inspiration.
Today, he writes about the world of medicines. His Twitter feed is excellent if you want to know more about some of the finer details about COVID related medicines: https://twitter.com/dereklowe?s=21.
Re: Things I Won't Work With: Dioxygen Difluoride (2010)
#67My personal favorite article from Derek Lowe about a chemical that isn't actually all that dangerous... but you still likely don't want it around. https://www.science.org/content/blog-post/things-i-won-t-wor...
Re: Things I Won't Work With: Dioxygen Difluoride (2010)
#68It reminds me of a similarly toned book called “Ignition!” By John Clark that is about the history of the development of rocket propellants. Recommend for a fun read.
Re: Things I Won't Work With: Dioxygen Difluoride (2010)
#69A fictional short story by Charles Stross that is a fitting companion piece to this article. An amusing discussion about using extremely dangerous substances as rocket fuel. https://www.tor.com/2012/07/20/a-tall-tail/
That book describes a number of approaches with beryllium: https://archive.org/details/ignition_201612/page/n201/mode/2...
> Recently they have been experimenting with beryllium instead of aluminum. Combustion efficiency with these propellants, particularly the beryllium-based ones, is bound to be bad, since the chamber temperature is comparatively low. ... About all it proves is the willingness of rocket people to try anything, no matter how implausible, if they can con NASA or one of the services into paying for it. ...
> When the combustion difficulties are added to the toxicity of BeO and the price of beryllium, there isn’t really much point in continuing with it.
and with fluorine, in the liquid form: https://archive.org/details/ignition_201612/page/n39/mode/2u...
> The optimum oxidizer is liquid oxygen. (“Fluorine might be good, but its density is too low, and it’s a holy terror to handle.”)
and in an oxidizer that can decompose: https://archive.org/details/ignition_201612/page/n87/mode/2u...
> O2F2 [FOOF] had been reported but was unstable at room temperature ... [a list of other compounds, concluding] ... So ClF3 it had to be. ... It is also quite probably the most vigorous fluorinating agent in existence-much more vigorous than fluorine itself. Gaseous fluorine, of course, is much more dilute than the liquid ClF3, and liquid fluorine is so cold that its activity is very much reduced.
The next page (p74) describes an industrial accident with it, then its use in aerospace:
> The results were excellent, but the difficulties were infuriating. Ignition was beautiful —so smooth that it was like turning on a hose. Performance was high—very close to theoretical. And the reaction was so fast that you could burn it in a surprisingly small chamber. But. If your hardware was dirty, and there was a smear of oil or grease somewhere inside a feed line, said feed line would ignite and cleverly reduce itself to ashes. Gaskets and O-rings generally had to be of metal; no organic material could be restrained from ignition. Teflon would stand up under static conditions, but if the CTF flowed over it with any speed at all, it would erode away like so much sugar in hot water, even if it didn’t ignite. So joints had to be welded whenever possible, and the welds had to be good ...
and that's before getting to the "real difficulties."
Stross certainly read "Ignition!" before writing that short story - https://www.antipope.org/charlie/blog-static/2009/10/there_i... .