Earlier quoted context omitted.
>that’s it’s not elderly people who are dying, but “primarily working-age people 18 to 64” "that’s it’s not elderly people who are dying" Am I missing something? Is this not a comparison?
It's a literary construction, emphasizing that the 40% increase is not an observation about elderly people. It's not intended to be taken alone as a statement about the elderly.
Indiana life insurance CEO says deaths are up 40% among people ages 18-64
51–60 of 600 posts
Re: Indiana life insurance CEO says deaths are up 40% among people ages 18-64
#52Earlier quoted context omitted.
Why must it be a comparison? A 40% increase in deaths for any population is mind boggling
It really isn't if you are starting from an extremely low baseline.
Re: Indiana life insurance CEO says deaths are up 40% among people ages 18-64
#53Earlier quoted context omitted.
There are multiple interpretations here. For example, if those disabilities are due to long COVID, then that would indicate that the cure is indeed not worse than the problem itself, but rather that the problem is even worse than we thought. Why is the total deaths up? Are cancer deaths going up because the system is stressed by COVID? Are the people who are dying people who had COVID, or people who didn't? Are peopl…
My point was the comparison between age groups is flawed. Nothing to do with cause.
Re: Indiana life insurance CEO says deaths are up 40% among people ages 18-64
#54Re: Indiana life insurance CEO says deaths are up 40% among people ages 18-64
#55Earlier quoted context omitted.
What claim do you believe is being made that utilizes this source in a biased way? It seems to me that in his remarks he was pretty clear about this data applying to the vertical of participants in employer plans, in a specific age group. I don’t think it’s any secret that the last two years have been poor for people’s mental & physical health. It stands to reason that we’re going to be feeling the consequences of th…
>that’s it’s not elderly people who are dying, but “primarily working-age people 18 to 64” He's literally claiming that elderly are not dying at the same rates, based on his internal customer data
Re: Indiana life insurance CEO says deaths are up 40% among people ages 18-64
#56Re: Indiana life insurance CEO says deaths are up 40% among people ages 18-64
#57> "The CDC weekly death counts, which reflect the information on death certificates and so have a lag of up to eight weeks or longer, show that for the week ending Nov. 6, there were far fewer deaths from COVID-19 in Indiana compared to a year ago – 195 verses 336 – but more deaths from other causes – 1,350 versus 1,319." So last year more covid deaths (particularly among the elderly), but while those numbers have de…
Re: Indiana life insurance CEO says deaths are up 40% among people ages 18-64
#58Quoted post unavailable.
I’ve read the article - I don’t see where it specifies the cause of the reported deaths. I interpreted it as deaths caused by Covid. Do you have a reason to interpret it differently?
Re: Indiana life insurance CEO says deaths are up 40% among people ages 18-64
#59Earlier quoted context omitted.
Fentanyl factor did not start in March of 2020.
2020 and 2021 both saw a sharp rise in fentanyl seizures at the border. https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/immigration/fentanyl-seizur...
Specially if you consider that the overdose deaths did not suddenly appear in 2020.
Re: Indiana life insurance CEO says deaths are up 40% among people ages 18-64
#60Earlier quoted context omitted.
Quoted post unavailable.
Why?