I wonder what the fentanyl factor is.
Indiana life insurance CEO says deaths are up 40% among people ages 18-64
21–30 of 600 posts
Re: Indiana life insurance CEO says deaths are up 40% among people ages 18-64
#22Why should we believe this biased source? >Davison said the increase in deaths represents “huge, huge numbers,” and that’s it’s not elderly people who are dying, but “primarily working-age people 18 to 64” who are the employees of companies that have group life insurance plans through OneAmerica. So he sees the data for non elderly people, because those are the people who have his company's plans. So he doesn't have…
What claim do you believe is being made that utilizes this source in a biased way? It seems to me that in his remarks he was pretty clear about this data applying to the vertical of participants in employer plans, in a specific age group. I don’t think it’s any secret that the last two years have been poor for people’s mental & physical health. It stands to reason that we’re going to be feeling the consequences of th…
>that’s it’s not elderly people who are dying, but “primarily working-age people 18 to 64”
He's literally claiming that elderly are not dying at the same rates, based on his internal customer data
Re: Indiana life insurance CEO says deaths are up 40% among people ages 18-64
#23Quoted post unavailable.
Your comment made me interested to see what happened to the suicide rate.
For 2020 it was down a touch.
https://www.statnews.com/2021/11/16/the-pandemic-didnt-incre...
Re: Indiana life insurance CEO says deaths are up 40% among people ages 18-64
#24I wonder what the fentanyl factor is.
Fentanyl factor did not start in March of 2020.
Re: Indiana life insurance CEO says deaths are up 40% among people ages 18-64
#25Re: Indiana life insurance CEO says deaths are up 40% among people ages 18-64
#26I wonder what the fentanyl factor is.
Fentanyl, P2P meth, and the world being turned upside down all at the same time was really a bad combo.
Re: Indiana life insurance CEO says deaths are up 40% among people ages 18-64
#27Why should we believe this biased source? >Davison said the increase in deaths represents “huge, huge numbers,” and that’s it’s not elderly people who are dying, but “primarily working-age people 18 to 64” who are the employees of companies that have group life insurance plans through OneAmerica. So he sees the data for non elderly people, because those are the people who have his company's plans. So he doesn't have…
Also this is a $100 billion company that is private and with only 2400 employees? Something doesn’t smell right.
Life insurance is mostly a passthrough from the living to the families of the dead
Most people never use the product.
Re: Indiana life insurance CEO says deaths are up 40% among people ages 18-64
#28[flagged]
Re: Indiana life insurance CEO says deaths are up 40% among people ages 18-64
#29I wonder what the fentanyl factor is.
Just idly wondering about information readily available from primary sources (CDC WISQARS database) does not advance the conversation.
Re: Indiana life insurance CEO says deaths are up 40% among people ages 18-64
#30Earlier quoted context omitted.
What claim do you believe is being made that utilizes this source in a biased way? It seems to me that in his remarks he was pretty clear about this data applying to the vertical of participants in employer plans, in a specific age group. I don’t think it’s any secret that the last two years have been poor for people’s mental & physical health. It stands to reason that we’re going to be feeling the consequences of th…
>that’s it’s not elderly people who are dying, but “primarily working-age people 18 to 64” He's literally claiming that elderly are not dying at the same rates, based on his internal customer data
Are we reading the same sentence?