Live data from Hacker News

Tokyo: A big city that is also pleasant to live in

economist.com

321–330 of 448 posts

Re: Tokyo: A big city that is also pleasant to live in

#321
post #8

Having lived in Tokyo for years, the elephant in the room is "cars". The whole city is full of pleasant mixed use neighborhoods that are more or less car-free, and centered around public transport hubs that have everything you need around them. People, including unaccompanied children, can and do safely walk and ride bikes everywhere at all hours of the day, including when grocery shopping etc. The world can learn a…

I live in Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam, and while it has many issues the general "not designed around cars" makes everything feel much more human scale which is something I miss when I visit the US. Unfortunately, cars are a status symbol and becoming increasingly prevalent, which then puts pressure on government officials to design around them. It doesn't help that government officials all have cars and clearly see car…

It's not designed around cars, but it is designed around motorbikes! Worse in many ways, although perhaps not in terms of "scale".

Re: Tokyo: A big city that is also pleasant to live in

#322

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Suburban land is cheaper to buy but far more expensive to service (water, electricity, roads, etc.) and maintain. https://www.strongtowns.org/the-growth-ponzi-scheme https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2017-05-02/inside-th... Cities are subsidizing your excessive consumption and land use not the other way around.

Is this really true though? Every infrastructure project in cities seems to cost billions of dollars (Boston’s Green Line Extension, New York’s 2nd Avenue Subway). It would take quite a lot of suburban road, gas, electric etc infrastructure to add up to anything close to that.

The infrastructure costs in cities are more expensive but service many more people and economic activity, they are amortized much more efficiently than a suburban bridge to nowhere.

Re: Tokyo: A big city that is also pleasant to live in

#323

Earlier quoted context omitted.

No need for door bells. No need for street signs. No need for taxi stops. No need for privately owned cars (rent via phone app or use Uber like service). Those things affect urban planning a lot.

I don't think we're ready for all those things to disappear. The only thing that really has gone since mobile phones are phone booths. But the thing is Street signs and door bells don't take up any space. There's no real benefit in removing them anyway. Private cars are a big issue but the problem is people commuting from outside the city and shared car schemes are too expensive for that.

Walking around Toronto, Canada, I've noticed that it's getting harder to find street signs. Their placement is for drivers in cars, not for people walking.

Re: Tokyo: A big city that is also pleasant to live in

#324

I love Tokyo but I know lots of Japanese people that love suburban America. They love the space. I quick search suggests the average size house in Tokyo is 66sq meters where as in LA it's 167sq meters or nearly 2.5x larger. And that's just LA. My guess is plenty of other suburbia cities the average is even larger. I lived in Tokyo for 15 years. My last place was 54sq meters. I like there are more options in sizes tha…

well yes, of course! the problem with suburbs is precisely that people like them. they're a societal trap, a clear example of negative externalities

Re: Tokyo: A big city that is also pleasant to live in

#325
post #291

Earlier quoted context omitted.

You know I used to believe that for many years and I’ve come to the conclusion that this is just a “bike-city” circle jerk scapegoating Robert Moses in order to ignore our deeper problem: Americans don’t like each-other. We would have built better cities if we wanted carless communities. But we didn’t and still don’t. We want this. This is what we like. We are a sick people. And it isn’t Robert Moses and GMs fault, t…

This is inaccurate. The GM conspiracy bought streetcar companies to replace them with buses, not to eliminate public transportation. The reality is that streetcar companies were already unprofitable, killed by infrastructure cars and poor urban planning. So it was already easy for GM to buy these companies.

> The reality is that streetcar companies were already unprofitable

What seems to me to be a good takedown of “public transit must be profitable or be dismantled”, or “the US post office must be profitable or be dismantled” is: How profitable is the US military?

Re: Tokyo: A big city that is also pleasant to live in

#326

Earlier quoted context omitted.

If those places were kicking him out, it’s probably because they were very shady. Criminal gangs hangouts, scammer hangouts, sex worker meetup places. There is your occasional nutjob small business owner that also kicks foreigners out, but that’s actually quite rare. But this is the racism that Western people suffer. Chinese people, especially mainlanders, are targetted quite badly.

Hah, I should mention, I'm a westerner, but I'm ethnically Chinese. I look Chinese but I can't read or speak Chinese. This type of targeting is def an important factor against not going to japan.

Yeah… I heard a lot of either revolting or heartbreaking stories. But also some great and uplifting ones.

I will not lie - the moment that you are perceived as Chinese, a lot of people can become assholes. Unfortunately, there is way too much nationalistic propaganda around.

But it’s also a place full of amazing people too. People who will appreciate you for what you are. I wouldn’t write off the whole country. But you do have to develop a thicker skin, unfortunately.

Re: Tokyo: A big city that is also pleasant to live in

#327
post #190

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Japan as a whole may not be bicycle friendly, but you can get across all the major cities on bike quite easily without interacting with high speed cars. There are either bike lanes on main roads or back streets with no traffic to circumvent interaction with cars. Have done this in Tokyo, Osaka and Nagoya and they have been fantastic cities to bike commute in.

There are definitely some areas were biking is amazing, such as Shimanami kaido, Biwa lake and Kasumigaura. Cycling in Tokyo is a bit of a mixed bag in my experience, some streets have bike lanes, some have a bicycle strip on the main road (though this is often shared with temporarily parked cars), sometimes bicycles need to share space with pedestrians. Signage is often unclear. I guess calling it bicycle unfriendly…

Biking in Tokyo is more casual and for short distance, people don't bike to work, they bike to the nearest train station or shopping street. It is very different attitude, there is no need for helmets, the speed is low and there are no dedicated lanes, most traffic is mixed with pedestrian traffic. I find it much nicer than the lycra culture of biking in countries like the US or Australia, but each biking culture makes sense when considering the different environments.

Re: Tokyo: A big city that is also pleasant to live in

#328
post #8

Having lived in Tokyo for years, the elephant in the room is "cars". The whole city is full of pleasant mixed use neighborhoods that are more or less car-free, and centered around public transport hubs that have everything you need around them. People, including unaccompanied children, can and do safely walk and ride bikes everywhere at all hours of the day, including when grocery shopping etc. The world can learn a…

and the cars that are there are smaller, with special kei car classes being smaller still.

Meanwhile in NA the market has shifted to ever larger and larger pick up trucks, which are more and more dangerous for pedestrians.

Re: Tokyo: A big city that is also pleasant to live in

#329

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Is this really true though? Every infrastructure project in cities seems to cost billions of dollars (Boston’s Green Line Extension, New York’s 2nd Avenue Subway). It would take quite a lot of suburban road, gas, electric etc infrastructure to add up to anything close to that.

The infrastructure costs in cities are more expensive but service many more people and economic activity, they are amortized much more efficiently than a suburban bridge to nowhere.

Is this true? As a case study, Boston’s population is about 700k, call it a million people living in a genuinely urban environment in greater Boston, of a metro area of 3 million. I think there’s more suburbanites than urbanites in most American metros.

Re: Tokyo: A big city that is also pleasant to live in

#330

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The infrastructure costs in cities are more expensive but service many more people and economic activity, they are amortized much more efficiently than a suburban bridge to nowhere.

Is this true? As a case study, Boston’s population is about 700k, call it a million people living in a genuinely urban environment in greater Boston, of a metro area of 3 million. I think there’s more suburbanites than urbanites in most American metros.

Where do the suburbanites work? That tunnel, rail, or subway is allowing who to get into and out of the city easier?

> The Green Line Extension (GLX) project will extend the existing MBTA Green Line service north of Lechmere Station and into the communities of Somerville, Cambridge, and Medford.

Post reply on HN