Live data from Hacker News

Russian court accidentally confirmed Russian military presence in Ukraine

znak.com

51–60 of 428 posts

Re: Russian court accidentally confirmed Russian military presence in Ukraine

#52
Just can't help but laugh at how fantastically trash Russia is.

They managed to completely piss off and alienate one of their oldest, best allies.

Now Ukraine is 100% anti Russian, well at least the ethnic Ukrainians are, and that's not going away any time soon.

They're also pro EU, but sadly this union is dragging their feet and providing empty promises, just like they do with Africa (while China actually funds them).

---

It must be great serving in the Russian army, knowing that you're the fascists now. Great for morale.

Look at them, isolated as hell, poor as dirt in one of the richest countries, fearing WW3.

Pathetic garbage, the Germans might've had a point.

Re: Russian court accidentally confirmed Russian military presence in Ukraine

#53
post #27

There is only way for country’s protection and it’s Israel’s way where whole country is also an army. Especially for countries near unfriendly countries like Russia in this submission. Because all the treaties and documents signed by politicians are absolutely worthless. Ukraine got rid of all the Soviet nuclear weapons and got lots of promises: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Budapest_Memorandum_on_Secur... Now they…

Just a few points:

- The Budapest Memorandum was, unfortunately, not legally binding. Not justifying the lack of support from the West, but just pointing out an important aspect.

- North Atlantic Treaty is legally binding. Also, the Baltic States already host a small multi-national contingent of NATO troops: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NATO_Enhanced_Forward_Presence

- It is also worth noting that the EU has mutual defence clause as per Article 42(7) of the Treaty on European Union. Nobody knows what legal or practical effect it would have though.

Re: Russian court accidentally confirmed Russian military presence in Ukraine

#54

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The only good outcome for the whole world is Putin and allies being ousted out of power and replaced by actual non-warmonger democrats. Imagine a future with Russia in the EU, best timeline. Nobody wants nuclear war, maybe some kind of super-sanctions would be the only recourse for the west, cut them off everything, and I mean everything.

Too bad Germany blundered by making themselves dependent on Russian gas to survive.

Germany is not dependent on Russian gas to survive, Russia's just the cheapest source of it.

Re: Russian court accidentally confirmed Russian military presence in Ukraine

#55
post #27

There is only way for country’s protection and it’s Israel’s way where whole country is also an army. Especially for countries near unfriendly countries like Russia in this submission. Because all the treaties and documents signed by politicians are absolutely worthless. Ukraine got rid of all the Soviet nuclear weapons and got lots of promises: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Budapest_Memorandum_on_Secur... Now they…

I'm certain that Israel's nukes and their strategic air strikes against Iran's nuclear/military facilities (preventing Iran from having nukes) contributes much more to their protection than a standing army.

This situation is obviously amplified 10x in Lithuania (population 30% of Israel) vs Russia (population 170% Iran).

Re: Russian court accidentally confirmed Russian military presence in Ukraine

#57
post #53
post #27

There is only way for country’s protection and it’s Israel’s way where whole country is also an army. Especially for countries near unfriendly countries like Russia in this submission. Because all the treaties and documents signed by politicians are absolutely worthless. Ukraine got rid of all the Soviet nuclear weapons and got lots of promises: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Budapest_Memorandum_on_Secur... Now they…

Just a few points: - The Budapest Memorandum was, unfortunately, not legally binding. Not justifying the lack of support from the West, but just pointing out an important aspect. - North Atlantic Treaty is legally binding. Also, the Baltic States already host a small multi-national contingent of NATO troops: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NATO_Enhanced_Forward_Presence - It is also worth noting that the EU has mutual…

And therein lies the rub: the EU would not be able to do much of anything without the rest of NATO to back them up. And in spite of Europe being dragged along in many American adventures in the middle east I wouldn't count on NATO sticking together either. Way too much 'realpolitik' going on to count on that for long term stability.

Re: Russian court accidentally confirmed Russian military presence in Ukraine

#58

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The only good outcome for the whole world is Putin and allies being ousted out of power and replaced by actual non-warmonger democrats. Imagine a future with Russia in the EU, best timeline. Nobody wants nuclear war, maybe some kind of super-sanctions would be the only recourse for the west, cut them off everything, and I mean everything.

Russia in EU would mean also Russia in NATO. Russia wanted to join NATO in 1990s and the answer of the alliance was "No". IIRC, one of the reasons behind that was that this means direct border with China. China is more important and there were hopes that China will democratize as it integrates itself into global economy, so that was an unnecessary risk. The times have changed, now everyone talks about containment - h…

I think Russia in the EU would mean no more NATO.

NATO is first and foremost a tool of American power in Europe and against Russia. If the geopolitical landscape changed so much that Russia decided to join the EU and was accepted, I think it would have to mean that the EU/Europe had shifted (back) to standing up on its own.

> with the economy of the similar size to Germany

Russia's economy is not that big. Nominal GDP is between Spain and Italy.

Re: Russian court accidentally confirmed Russian military presence in Ukraine

#59
so this article is in russian/ukranian (or another language in cyrillic) and i wonder, did all people liking or commenting here really read this?

as a european i tend to be very skeptical of the US involvement in eastern europe. they seem to be exploiting the enmity of some eastern european nations toward russia for own economic gain and to stop russia selling its natural resources to EU. all the while being many many miles away from the danger zone. one has to wonder, how would people of US percieve the situation if Mexico decided to host Russian bases and missiles

Post reply on HN