Live data from Hacker News

James Dyson answers design questions from Twitter [video]

youtube.com

101–110 of 137 posts

Re: James Dyson answers design questions from Twitter [video]

#101
post #49

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The max button is like the old turbo button for your computer. Does anyone really use 'slow' mode?

Turbo mode kills the battery faster and stresses the battery harder.

So basically when I push that 'max' button I am overclocking my dyson. Walking the glorious tightrope between a performance boost and molten mess of silicon.

Cleaning day just got a whole lot more fun.

Re: James Dyson answers design questions from Twitter [video]

#102
post #6

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Bill Gates is doing the same thing. It's annoying. https://agfundernews.com/gates-if-not-for-climate-then-why-i...

I think in the US there are also a good tax breaks for creating 'farms' on your land. Since we give so much subsidy to the industry. IIRC lot of billionaires will get sheep grazing or something like that to claim their mega mansions as farms. I thought I remember Marc Cuban is an example but can't find a quick source. So maybe my memory is wrong on this one.

Here in NJ a typical middle class house pays 10-25k/yr in property taxes. But if you have 5 acres and sell a few thousand dollars worth of pumpkins you pay near zero because you're a farm. https://www.nj.com/politics/2019/09/how-to-cut-your-property...

Re: James Dyson answers design questions from Twitter [video]

#103
post #47

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Thats gonna be tricky, you thinking dig up the corpse and ask him or break out the Ouija board?

Either way, the point stands. Just because you don't like someone isn't really justification for asking a tough question if you're not willing to ask similar tough questions to somebody you do like.

I would be infinitely more interested in Freeman Dyson's position on tough topics than James'. But Freeman isn't an influential figure today, so it wouldn't be very relevant for most people. James on the other hand...

Re: James Dyson answers design questions from Twitter [video]

#104
im thinking of starting a crusade to inform people that there is an actually cool billionaire inventor who is totally legit, and his name is dan gelbart. i challenge anyone to watch his prototyping series on youtube and then tell me elon musk is cool lol.

Re: James Dyson answers design questions from Twitter [video]

#105
post #7

Maybe he should explain his Brexit position? As far as I know this man is not an expert in anything but shirking expensive gimmicky fans and being a huge hypocrite, why he should be considered a authority in design I don't know. I've ways wondered what clout James Dyson gets for being confused with Freeman Dyson, an actual genius.

Also, Dyson products feel incredibly cheap in the hand to me for the price paid. You can just feel how many cycles of cost reduction each one went through. Expensive products are one thing, but products that are upmarketed primarily because a big name wants more money, rub me the wrong way. It shows a disdain for your customer. I feel holding him up as some guru perpetuates this annoyance.

depends on the dyson product. i've got the dyson supersonic hairdrier. rock solid, feels super expensive (and it is). best hairdrier i've had, and i went thru them all.

Re: James Dyson answers design questions from Twitter [video]

#106

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I really dislike Dyson. 1) Move to Singapore, citing that Britain won't join the euro as a factor. 2) EU energy efficiency test goes against his product 3) Campaigns for Brexit I had one of his vacuum cleaners and it was under powered and always needed cleaning inside. I got a Meile with a bag afterwards. Much more powerful for less money.

It's hit or miss. For a plug-in vacuum, there are others I would choose first. But for a cordless stick vacuum, nobody else is comparable.

I have a Shark Vertex Cordless. It has a duo dry roller and a no-tangle roller. No other Cordless Vac had that.

It's last year model though, not sure what the improvements are now!

Re: James Dyson answers design questions from Twitter [video]

#107
post #3

Does he talk about the design of the legal structure for his tax avoidance vehicle that holds the land he has bought up in the UK? lol https://whoownsengland.org/2017/09/19/why-is-james-dyson-hoo... "By July 2017, Farmers Weekly was reporting that Dyson’s empire had grown to 13,355 hectares, or 33,000 acres."

I really dislike Dyson. 1) Move to Singapore, citing that Britain won't join the euro as a factor. 2) EU energy efficiency test goes against his product 3) Campaigns for Brexit I had one of his vacuum cleaners and it was under powered and always needed cleaning inside. I got a Meile with a bag afterwards. Much more powerful for less money.

Don't even get me started on the worst designed hand dryers ever. Who wants to put their hands into two thin streams of air and move them up and down while avoiding the sides, and not being able to rub them together to distribute the moisture? Give ma an XLERATOR any day.

(And I hear the hair products aren't all that.)

Re: James Dyson answers design questions from Twitter [video]

#108
post #47

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Thats gonna be tricky, you thinking dig up the corpse and ask him or break out the Ouija board?

Either way, the point stands. Just because you don't like someone isn't really justification for asking a tough question if you're not willing to ask similar tough questions to somebody you do like.

Well it was a terrible example; asking tough questions of a dead person is an incredibly tough thing to do.

Asking a nonagenarian, alive, at the tail end of their life specifically their position on climate change is hardly a "tough question" anyway. It is a question of the future, unless one is challenging them on their past misdeeds (congratulations for berating a 90 something year old), which they will sadly experience very little of. I suspect in every scenario the position of the person asking the question will be a lot more insightful.

While I completely agree with your point; if for a single issue any person is giving regular interviews, putting out press releases, commenting frequently on their social media and funding single issue political campaigns, and in all ways is identifying themselves with said issue, then mentioning it is fair game.

Re: James Dyson answers design questions from Twitter [video]

#109
post #46

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I have googled it, a person on youtube claims to be able to straighten hair with a curler; some kind of magic I think - I am not willing to suffer the pain that watching the video would inflict on my youtube reccomendations to determine the exact form of magic or witchcraft involved.

Just searching for it probably did harm in and of itself. "Because you searched for..." type of stuff

Probably best I log out of youtube on the tv otherwise someone is going to expect dyson hair curlers/straighteners/curlers for christmas.

Re: James Dyson answers design questions from Twitter [video]

#110

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Either way, the point stands. Just because you don't like someone isn't really justification for asking a tough question if you're not willing to ask similar tough questions to somebody you do like.

Well it was a terrible example; asking tough questions of a dead person is an incredibly tough thing to do. Asking a nonagenarian, alive, at the tail end of their life specifically their position on climate change is hardly a "tough question" anyway. It is a question of the future, unless one is challenging them on their past misdeeds (congratulations for berating a 90 something year old), which they will sadly exper…

So you're saying you wouldn't be interested in what Einstein, Newton, Turing, etc had to opine? It seems some people are really boring around here.
Post reply on HN