Honestly, I would not be surprised if some "I want everything to be modern" web dev convinced the powers that be that it was obsolete because he couldn't be bothered with it.
“We removed the RSS feed since this technology became obsolete”
81–90 of 249 posts
Re: “We removed the RSS feed since this technology became obsolete”
#82Is there a current and well functioning tool that pulls full articles from the links inside most RSS feeds that only publish teasers? When I first discovered RSS for me, I wanted news to read on the road. It was before Smartphones became ubiquitous. Unfortunately most news sites only published a few lines of text per article. Now, I would like to do the same when there is no network coverage. But I still don't know a…
Re: “We removed the RSS feed since this technology became obsolete”
#83I got the same argument after I asked why there's no more RSS/Atom feed of the news section in my municipality's website. Some positive people tell me that RSS is not dead and it's still everywhere. Unfortunately, especially after modern redesigns, RSS gets dropped as "obsolete technology". The sad thing is that this doesn't only happen to optional websites which I could choose not to follow out of principle like blo…
Y'all need to lean into the game a bit. Most of the time, things don't win or stay just because they are good. They win because of good marketing, etc. RSS, the brand, is a loser at this point. It is viewed as old, tired, and obsolete. It doesn't matter if it is the right tech. That's not a state you can grow from. At this point the right answer (IMHO) is to create a new thing that is very similar, but has a new bran…
Re: “We removed the RSS feed since this technology became obsolete”
#84Earlier quoted context omitted.
Inoreader (paid pro version) will also allow you to create feeds for sites that do not publish via rss.
> Inoreader (paid pro version) will also allow you to create feeds for sites that do not publish via rss. I am a paid pro subscriber on Inoreader, and use it 2-3 hours a day for my work. I should mention that it provides a very limited number of certain types of feed (custom-created RSS, Twitter feeds, etc.), and you'll run out of them almost immediately if you want to follow a lot of places. That said, Inoreader let…
Re: “We removed the RSS feed since this technology became obsolete”
#85Obsolete?! Replaced by what?!?!?!? I think obsolescence implies replacement!
I'm not so sure. Take vhs rewinders for example. VHS cassettes and players were obsoleted by DVDs and DVD players respectively but there is no analogous new tech to the rewinder. It was a dead end. Maybe I'm splitting hairs.
Re: “We removed the RSS feed since this technology became obsolete”
#86Don't expect people to keep coming back to your website/blog just to check if there is new content/news. If it doesn't provide a feed (Atom or RSS), the most probable scenario is that I will not remember to comeback any time soon.
Re: “We removed the RSS feed since this technology became obsolete”
#87Earlier quoted context omitted.
For what it's worth: When I first launched my Wordpress-based website back in 2005, I initially had it set up to post full articles to the RSS feed. Soon, however, a major downside appeared: It became absolutely trivial for other sites to reproduce my content, and they did in droves. My writings appeared all over the web on generic Wordpress sites, usually attributed to other people. After grappling with the problem…
Yes, it totally makes sense. I hold no grudge against news sites or anyone who chooses to publish teasers either. And be it only because they need statistics on which articles are more or less popular. Or ad revenue... Unfortunately the negative effect for my end remains. Sometimes there is no ideal solution for everyone, I guess.
Re: “We removed the RSS feed since this technology became obsolete”
#88The general upside of Wordpress powering all-the-things is that usually means there is an RSS feed if you poke around hard enough.
Re: “We removed the RSS feed since this technology became obsolete”
#89This hurts. RSS is the only way I know, without having to scrap things by hand, to get an aggregate of "news/articles" from the sites and blogs I follow, and I consider to be of good quality. I prefer to filter my information like this, instead of having to rely on some algorithm, or endlessly scrolling in a "social medial wall" full or clickbait articles, immortal/vintage memes or exuberant rants. If RSS dies, what…
I haven't signed up for any so I'm not sure, but don't some places have "newsletters"? I kind of assumed they served the same function but with email. Of course, if it does serve the same function, the bad part about it in comparison to RSS would be that you have to give them an email address.
Re: “We removed the RSS feed since this technology became obsolete”
#90Earlier quoted context omitted.
That isn't usually how NGOs raise money.
Yes, but I have seen a pattern in many websites for clubs, non-profits, student projects and other non-commercial places. They follow trends that they see in popular services. The idea that RSS is dead is unlikely to have originated from the NGO.