Live data from Hacker News

“We removed the RSS feed since this technology became obsolete”

twitter.com

81–90 of 249 posts

Re: “We removed the RSS feed since this technology became obsolete”

#81
Oh come on. How much maintenance could it actually be to keep it?

Honestly, I would not be surprised if some "I want everything to be modern" web dev convinced the powers that be that it was obsolete because he couldn't be bothered with it.

Re: “We removed the RSS feed since this technology became obsolete”

#82

Is there a current and well functioning tool that pulls full articles from the links inside most RSS feeds that only publish teasers? When I first discovered RSS for me, I wanted news to read on the road. It was before Smartphones became ubiquitous. Unfortunately most news sites only published a few lines of text per article. Now, I would like to do the same when there is no network coverage. But I still don't know a…

https://github.com/Dither/full-text-rss

https://github.com/alrs/full-text-rss-docker

Re: “We removed the RSS feed since this technology became obsolete”

#83
post #33

I got the same argument after I asked why there's no more RSS/Atom feed of the news section in my municipality's website. Some positive people tell me that RSS is not dead and it's still everywhere. Unfortunately, especially after modern redesigns, RSS gets dropped as "obsolete technology". The sad thing is that this doesn't only happen to optional websites which I could choose not to follow out of principle like blo…

Y'all need to lean into the game a bit. Most of the time, things don't win or stay just because they are good. They win because of good marketing, etc. RSS, the brand, is a loser at this point. It is viewed as old, tired, and obsolete. It doesn't matter if it is the right tech. That's not a state you can grow from. At this point the right answer (IMHO) is to create a new thing that is very similar, but has a new bran…

I'm trying to figure out if this is serious or parody. You do know that RSS is a spec, not a brand, right? Right?

Re: “We removed the RSS feed since this technology became obsolete”

#84

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Inoreader (paid pro version) will also allow you to create feeds for sites that do not publish via rss.

> Inoreader (paid pro version) will also allow you to create feeds for sites that do not publish via rss. I am a paid pro subscriber on Inoreader, and use it 2-3 hours a day for my work. I should mention that it provides a very limited number of certain types of feed (custom-created RSS, Twitter feeds, etc.), and you'll run out of them almost immediately if you want to follow a lot of places. That said, Inoreader let…

Just checked Inoreader's pricing plans and it looks like pro level gets you 20 custom-created rss feeds before you need to call for custom pricing.

Re: “We removed the RSS feed since this technology became obsolete”

#85
post #9

Obsolete?! Replaced by what?!?!?!? I think obsolescence implies replacement!

I'm not so sure. Take vhs rewinders for example. VHS cassettes and players were obsoleted by DVDs and DVD players respectively but there is no analogous new tech to the rewinder. It was a dead end. Maybe I'm splitting hairs.

The belt drive of the laser in an optical reader, and to some extent the servo motors actuating hard drive heads, were the direct successors that obsoleted the VHS rewinder. The wide data bus providing random access to persistent solid state memory has already obsoleted one and is nearly done with the other.

Re: “We removed the RSS feed since this technology became obsolete”

#86
That is a complete nonsense. RSS is one of the most useful tools for those that don't have "social media" accounts.

Don't expect people to keep coming back to your website/blog just to check if there is new content/news. If it doesn't provide a feed (Atom or RSS), the most probable scenario is that I will not remember to comeback any time soon.

Re: “We removed the RSS feed since this technology became obsolete”

#87

Earlier quoted context omitted.

For what it's worth: When I first launched my Wordpress-based website back in 2005, I initially had it set up to post full articles to the RSS feed. Soon, however, a major downside appeared: It became absolutely trivial for other sites to reproduce my content, and they did in droves. My writings appeared all over the web on generic Wordpress sites, usually attributed to other people. After grappling with the problem…

Yes, it totally makes sense. I hold no grudge against news sites or anyone who chooses to publish teasers either. And be it only because they need statistics on which articles are more or less popular. Or ad revenue... Unfortunately the negative effect for my end remains. Sometimes there is no ideal solution for everyone, I guess.

Indeed. As is too often the case, a few bad actors ruin an otherwise elegant solution.

Re: “We removed the RSS feed since this technology became obsolete”

#88
post #23

The general upside of Wordpress powering all-the-things is that usually means there is an RSS feed if you poke around hard enough.

I haven't noticed a WordPress blog where the RSS feed wasn't properly advertised. Does it depend on the theme to include the appropriate link tag? Or maybe it is just sampling bias where I don't notice that WordPress sites are actually wordpress if they don't advertise the feed.

Re: “We removed the RSS feed since this technology became obsolete”

#89

This hurts. RSS is the only way I know, without having to scrap things by hand, to get an aggregate of "news/articles" from the sites and blogs I follow, and I consider to be of good quality. I prefer to filter my information like this, instead of having to rely on some algorithm, or endlessly scrolling in a "social medial wall" full or clickbait articles, immortal/vintage memes or exuberant rants. If RSS dies, what…

> RSS is the only way I know, without having to scrap things by hand, to get an aggregate of "news/articles" from the sites and blogs I follow

I haven't signed up for any so I'm not sure, but don't some places have "newsletters"? I kind of assumed they served the same function but with email. Of course, if it does serve the same function, the bad part about it in comparison to RSS would be that you have to give them an email address.

Re: “We removed the RSS feed since this technology became obsolete”

#90
post #53

Earlier quoted context omitted.

That isn't usually how NGOs raise money.

Yes, but I have seen a pattern in many websites for clubs, non-profits, student projects and other non-commercial places. They follow trends that they see in popular services. The idea that RSS is dead is unlikely to have originated from the NGO.

If the NGO tells you that RSS is rarely used compared to other methods, I would probably believe them. There really isn't any reason for them to lie about it.
Post reply on HN