Live data from Hacker News

This website has 81% battery power remaining

solar.lowtechmagazine.com

321–330 of 365 posts

Re: This website has 81% battery power remaining

#321

*Technically*, this is very cool, impressive, and generally an elegant work of art. *Pragmatically*, I see 2 flaws in their thesis (as explained on the about page): >> "The entire network already consumes 10% of global electricity production with traffic doubling roughly every 2 years" I think the implication is electricity consumption will also double roughly every 2 years, but Moore's law actually operates on appro…

That is entirely forgetting that you throw away and replace hardware in that timeline - what happens to the old hardware?

Re: This website has 81% battery power remaining

#322
post #308

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I did this last winter. Mining 24/7 on my personal rig noticeably took a bit of load off the heater and made a modest amount of ethereum. I stopped once the weather warmed as it seemed like a waste of energy.

How were your electric bills?

Not appreciably different, that was the whole logic behind my thinking. In my case I have electric heaters, so doesn't make a difference compared to a gpu -- they're both effectively 100% thermally efficient.

Re: This website has 81% battery power remaining

#323

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Reddit web is incredibly sluggish. I open the app to browse which is a smooth experience (putng aside dark patterns). Same for Twitter. Maybe it's intentional to move users into the app, where ads are more likely to be actually seen (e.g. Many web users have ad blockers) and in app purchases are frictionless.

Just FYI, for Reddit there's an amazing third-party client called Apollo on iOS, and I'm sure there are others too, same on Android.

Yeah I have it. I actually made the in app purchase to support the developer.

I ended up going back to the official app which I think is nice, but also feel nice about financially supporting an indie developer who does a nice third party client for a (generally) awesome community.

Re: This website has 81% battery power remaining

#325

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It'd be interesting to know what you actually are doing! Thoughts and Prayers, etc

Oh, actually, just browsing to kill time while watching the open browser window at the side refresh on the NHS booking site hoping it will work long enough to give me a booster jab appointment. It alternates between "you are in a queue ten minutes to go" and "our site is overloaded please try later" for about two hours now. Everyone else between the ages of 18-50 in the UK is basically doing the same thing, hammering…

https://twitter.com/AmandaPritchard/status/14703629354489856...

> Over 110,000 people booked their COVID-19 booster vaccine before 9am this morning.

I don't know if this is a huge amount of traffic, or just an unexpectedly large bump.

Good luck getting a booking!

Re: This website has 81% battery power remaining

#326

I think this also shows how inefficient modern website hosting is. The fact that this person was able to get a raspberry pi to host the #1 website on HN powered by a small 50 watt solar panel is very cool (meaning maybe 10w average power budget), but also shouldn't be as uncommon as it is today. To put this in perspective, a modern server uses 50-100 watts idle doing nothing, and many more under load. To handle the t…

I recall someone saying that being on HN front page resulted in a peak load of a few requests per second. I.e. absolutely nothing if you're just serving static content.

Re: This website has 81% battery power remaining

#327
post #296

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> power consumption has increased significantly, and is about to become unreasonable in my opinion It is not the first time it has happened, and then went down again. It's just one of the usual "cycles".

I don't think we've went through a circle of more then doubling the power consumption before, but I've only been paying attention to it since shortly before 2010, as I was using prebuilt systems before that. Maybe you're right and more then doubling the power consumption is a normal thing that just occasionally happens.

Precisely it was with Core that I think the previous "nuclear power CPUs" cycle ended.

Re: This website has 81% battery power remaining

#328
*located in Barcelona*

I hugely admire this website and the tech/philosophy behind it. So much so that I decided to build one myself. But here's the problem: I live in Yorkshire (UK) where good weather usually means a thinner layer of cloud cover. I tried, I really did, but I'm not about to move to Spain :) Long may this project continue (while I dream of more sun).

Re: This website has 81% battery power remaining

#329
post #206
post #97

As another commenter pointed out, Lead-Acid batteries are terrible for this. They are fine for backup power supplies that you don't expect to actually use more than a couple of times a year, but discharging them too much will completely kill them, and even if you keep a margin and discharge them to only 30%, the number of cycles is quite limited (1500 to 3000 cycles quoted in [1] seems a bit optimistic, probably depe…

The problem with LFP batteries is that they really need to be kept resonably close to room temperature in order to be efficient and safe to charge. This is fine if you're using them for some kind of off-grid home that needs to be heated anyway or for intermittent high-power applications like cars that can cope with the energy required for heating and cooling them, but it won't really work in this setup.

Thanks for pointing this out, I didn't have it in mind.

You probably need some insulation, and some sort of heating, although the computing device could probably provide the heat. Handling summer/winter cycles without human intervention might be a bit complex, but intervening twice a year doesn't seem too much hassle.

> it won't really work in this setup.

I don't recall reading that it was placed outdoors.

Re: This website has 81% battery power remaining

#330
post #289

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The frames of aluminium are obviously directly recyclable. The silicon is also completely recyclable, so you are talking about fractional materials being “wasted” if you apply a zero effort approach of recycling. Applying a small amount of effort, given you’d need to re-smelt the silicon, all of the materials you mentioned have different melting points (mostly lower than silicon) so you could extract them at the appr…

Recycling isn't free. Currently it costs 20-30x more to recycle a panel than to dump it in a landfill. Maybe the aluminum frame, the glass and polymer sheets, and the junction box containing the copper wiring are relatively straightforward to recycle, but it takes much more complicated (see: expensive) machines to get to the smaller parts like the intra-cell wiring and the silicon itself. And the silicon wafers aren'…

Okay, so we’ve moved on from: Panels can’t be recycled. To: Panels in the US aren’t recycled enough because the economic conditions aren’t right.

Thats a much more nuanced point. Government regulation can help here for sure.

Post reply on HN