Earlier quoted context omitted.
Unclear why the cynicism is warranted here. They’re not just making a guess, they performed an experiment that is inline with a comparable experiment from non affiliated SA scientists to yield these results. Should they not run this type of experiment and make a useful and true recommendation to the public? Would that be a better more pure scenario for you?
No they should not make recommendations to the public, because they aren't a public agency - they have a conflict of interest. It's like a hedge fund manager giving public advice on stock picks.
Pfizer and Biontech provide update on Omicron variant
71–80 of 717 posts
Re: Pfizer and Biontech provide update on Omicron variant
#72Re: Pfizer and Biontech provide update on Omicron variant
#73Re: Pfizer and Biontech provide update on Omicron variant
#74Earlier quoted context omitted.
No they should not make recommendations to the public, because they aren't a public agency - they have a conflict of interest. It's like a hedge fund manager giving public advice on stock picks.
>It's like a hedge fund manager giving public advice on stock picks. Why not? Stock picking is their job. Given that logic, a teacher shouldn't tell people how to teach their kid to read, and a plumber shouldn't tell people how to change a faucet.
Re: Pfizer and Biontech provide update on Omicron variant
#75Is "First Shot" "Second Shot" and "Booster" the same as 3 "doses"?
According to the CVS person who did my booster, the booster for Pfizer is a full dose while the Moderna booster is a half dose (relative to each manufacturer's original first and second shot doses).
If that is correct, then Moderna's booster would still be more vaccine (50 micrograms) than Pfizer's original dose.
Of course more is not necessarily better!
Re: Pfizer and Biontech provide update on Omicron variant
#76Not to hijack the thread: why is my post being flagged? I'm asking a genuine question! I was linking to UK Government data here [0] and asking about the numbers. They're not adding up. I want to know if my interpretation is correct [0] - https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/birthsde...
Look all the way over at "Second dose", the age-standardized mortality rate is 1.1 per 100,000 vs 5.4 per 100,000 for the unvaccinated. 5x protection against death.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_traffic...
Re: Pfizer and Biontech provide update on Omicron variant
#77It's not deadly enough for me to consider a booster, I'll pass on this supplementary shot https://www.marketwatch.com/story/who-has-not-seen-any-repor...
I’m fascinated by this thinking. Do you really want to roll the dice on an infection and long term consequences including permanent loss of smell (and taste)? If this virus killed exactly no one but it just commonly removed one of your senses…is that not motivation enough to avoid it? Additionally, I just got over a two week adenovirus infection and it absolutely sucked. Not the sickest I’ve been, but the most sympto…
Disinformation like yours doesn't help anybody, and makes discourse about covid more contentious than it otherwise would be.
Re: Pfizer and Biontech provide update on Omicron variant
#78It's not deadly enough for me to consider a booster, I'll pass on this supplementary shot https://www.marketwatch.com/story/who-has-not-seen-any-repor...
Not deadly enough _to you_. I'm sure those who are vulnerable will thank you immensely for your compassion.
Hospitalization and death are severely lagging indicators - no one knows how deadly it is in what populations.
This is about as stupid a sentiment as HR directors demanding applicants have 10 years experience in [New_Language] two years after it is invented.
This sort of propaganda should have no place on HN
Re: Pfizer and Biontech provide update on Omicron variant
#79Earlier quoted context omitted.
I don’t know myself, but this happens frequently. Any body can flag your posts.
Untrue, I believe you need a certain amount of karma to be able to flag.
Re: Pfizer and Biontech provide update on Omicron variant
#80Earlier quoted context omitted.
If you want to seriously discuss you should put which data points your comparing so others can also compare. When I look at that sheet and look at the rates comparing unvaccinated vs fully faccinated the death rate is lower for every age group when vaccinated. * Comparing week ending 24th September 2021
They're comparing different/dates/vaccination rates, classic Simpson's paradox. No adjusted data shows otherwise.
Unvax 80+ - 28 deaths Double-vax 80+ - 243 deaths
What does that mean? It lools like more die with a double-dose. Is that not correct?