Earlier quoted context omitted.
Asking this question pretty much reveals what you’re going to recommend. Obviously, I’m looking for opinions about: “CCP good, or CCP bad?”
I don't follow. What was I going to recommend?
“CCP good”
What Peng Shuai reveals about one-party rule
291–300 of 347 posts
Re: What Peng Shuai reveals about one-party rule
#292Re: What Peng Shuai reveals about one-party rule
#293Earlier quoted context omitted.
>It is a radically nationalist pro-China forum to the point where they regularly push anti-US conspiracy theories and regular usage of words like "Amerikkka". The person you're replying to is an occasional poster to that subreddit, who surely knows this already
Which means you're an active lurker there and saw his name often?
>Which means you're an active lurker there and saw his name often?
I guess what you're trying to ask me is "How do you know that?"?
But rather than trusting any more of my claims, I suggest that you simply visit Reddit and look: You will see exactly the same unusual user name; with the same interests as here in various diverse topics; and the same writing style
Really, I think the initial question about the OP's behavior on Reddit was intrusive and probably out of line in HN etiquette, and the OP could ignore it
But I commented because the OP did engage with that question, and lied. And also because you then replied to OP in good faith, not realizing that you were wasting your time by trying to help someone who is obviously being disingenuous
Re: What Peng Shuai reveals about one-party rule
#294Earlier quoted context omitted.
Well, political fights based on sexual activity. If you dont like to see why Gaoli made this awful deed, then you have to understand the underlying human drive. I am stating a fact. Facts hurt, but that does not make my statement awful. It's just that readers dont like certain facts.
What was your original comment?
[flagged]
Re: What Peng Shuai reveals about one-party rule
#295Earlier quoted context omitted.
>I am glad that the world has a diverse set of governance systems. Except when it comes to Taiwan, right?
I am in favor of Taiwan keeping its governance system. So...
but CCP is not, (which is easily check able), so speaks a lot about your inability to connect facts.
Besides, not a reason to look at Taiwan's future, while you can look at Honk Kong past two years.
Re: What Peng Shuai reveals about one-party rule
#296Re: What Peng Shuai reveals about one-party rule
#297Earlier quoted context omitted.
Can you be more specific? We are talking here about a former professional player the China government made disappear.
He’s referring to Jamie Dimon from JPMorgan. I thought Dimon has quite the balls to come out on China like that, touching CCP and Taiwan (“China’s Vietnam” he called it, referring to America’s war) in a way that no one with business interests in China would.
Yeah, I'm talking about Dimon. China deserves the negativity, but dunking on them publicly like that only makes it easier for the government to drum up anti-US sentiment.
Re: What Peng Shuai reveals about one-party rule
#298Earlier quoted context omitted.
Which means you're an active lurker there and saw his name often?
>Which means you're an active lurker there and saw his name often? I guess what you're trying to ask me is "How do you know that?"? But rather than trusting any more of my claims, I suggest that you simply visit Reddit and look: You will see exactly the same unusual user name; with the same interests as here in various diverse topics; and the same writing style Really, I think the initial question about the OP's beha…
[deleted]
Re: What Peng Shuai reveals about one-party rule
#299Earlier quoted context omitted.
It is a radically nationalist pro-China forum to the point where they regularly push anti-US conspiracy theories and regular usage of words like "Amerikkka".
>It is a radically nationalist pro-China forum to the point where they regularly push anti-US conspiracy theories and regular usage of words like "Amerikkka". The person you're replying to is an occasional poster to that subreddit, who surely knows this already
Lmao, HNers will eagerly doxx/dig up dirt on someone for a Gotcha moment but is offended by someone suggesting they validate propagandistic claims about a foreign country.
Honestly I have no recollection of ever visiting reddit Sino subreddit.
Re: What Peng Shuai reveals about one-party rule
#300Earlier quoted context omitted.
I am in favor of Taiwan keeping its governance system. So...
but CCP is not, (which is easily check able), so speaks a lot about your inability to connect facts. Besides, not a reason to look at Taiwan's future, while you can look at Honk Kong past two years.
What, you expect me to agree with CCP on all fronts?