Earlier quoted context omitted.
It is a radically nationalist pro-China forum to the point where they regularly push anti-US conspiracy theories and regular usage of words like "Amerikkka".
>It is a radically nationalist pro-China forum to the point where they regularly push anti-US conspiracy theories and regular usage of words like "Amerikkka". The person you're replying to is an occasional poster to that subreddit, who surely knows this already
What Peng Shuai reveals about one-party rule
251–260 of 347 posts
Re: What Peng Shuai reveals about one-party rule
#252Earlier quoted context omitted.
How do you know 98% Chinese people are happy if there is no credible, independent study? Surely any study saying Chinese are unhappy would be censored.
Here you go, independent study by York University https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2021/05/05/did-pande...
It's not independent, a study, or by York University, it was a ccp sponsored poll performed in China, by party members, with data collated and compiled by party members.
It's rare to see propaganda crumble to so delicate an interrogation, that's some primo stuff.
Re: What Peng Shuai reveals about one-party rule
#253Earlier quoted context omitted.
Mind that some of those mentioned receive money from the CCP https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kOIrsmjRFxU
Yep, thanks.
I recommend you to watch arguments from both sides and then decide for yourself whether the accusation is right or not.
Re: What Peng Shuai reveals about one-party rule
#254Earlier quoted context omitted.
How is the specific content of her Weibo post relevant at all here? The issue is that the woman was kidnapped by the Chinese government because simple because she spoke out publicly, and it seems to me that the media’s reporting has been very complete in that regard. What specifically has been lacking?
I heard about her disappearance from social media for a time. Can you link information about her kidnapping please.
Re: What Peng Shuai reveals about one-party rule
#255Earlier quoted context omitted.
Here you go, independent study by York University https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2021/05/05/did-pande...
This one actually made me belly laugh, thanks for that. It's not independent, a study, or by York University, it was a ccp sponsored poll performed in China, by party members, with data collated and compiled by party members. It's rare to see propaganda crumble to so delicate an interrogation, that's some primo stuff.
The author even explicitly stated that the survey was anonymous. The author states that their findings are consistent with other studies.
Re: What Peng Shuai reveals about one-party rule
#256Earlier quoted context omitted.
Or the whole thing to Taiwan. It's China after all (according to China alone).
It might be a bit warm in Taiwan for the Winter Olympics. And it's barely China alone who see it as China. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geography_of_Taiwan#Climate
https://taiwan-scene.com/cool-ice-hockey-in-a-hot-hot-land-t...
Taiwan actually has a hockey scene, I'm sure they'd love to host.
Re: What Peng Shuai reveals about one-party rule
#257Re: What Peng Shuai reveals about one-party rule
#258Every time there is a story that criticizes China's Communist Party there is a flood of troll-like comments here in Hacker News. Lot of "What about X" comments and just general trolling and uncivil behavior. As a non-Chinese I never could understand the relationship of CCP, Chinese nationals and Chinese immigrants in the US and West. To me, it seems very hyocritcal to live in the Western societies and be very pro-CCP…
I'm pretty sure this happens because people in ycombinator circles use HN as a high quality content pipeline, and because of dang's impeccable curation, front page HN content gets greenlit for immediate display. If you see something on HN, it'll almost inevitably show up on Slashdot, Reddit, Facebook, and a slew of other smaller sites and forums, often unchanged from its presentation here.
HN also has the bonus that many silicon valley movers and shakers frequent the site and join the discussions. China's troll generals would be foolish not to capitalize on that.
As far as immigrants defending ccp that's usually because they have family back in China and would like to see them again some day. Their family's social standing could take a hit if they are insufficiently "patriotic," even in the US. China's got social influence inside the US, and extensive networks of casual spies that report problematic behaviors, ranging from local cultural clubs and groups to college and campus outreach organizations. It's very (darkly) sophisticated.
Re: What Peng Shuai reveals about one-party rule
#259Earlier quoted context omitted.
The Imperial China period from 200-something BC to 1912 had pretty solid control over a fair chunk of what we think of as modern China.
One could make a similar argument and generalize about Europeans and claim European unity exists because for most of the past 2,000 years practically all states in Europe were under the influence of the Catholic church in some way or another. China's history is as complicated as any other similarly sized territory: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:China_Dynasties.gif and https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_Chi…