Live data from Hacker News

Swedish study finds discrimination against men in female-dominated occupations

psypost.org

261–270 of 291 posts

Re: Swedish study finds discrimination against men in female-dominated occupations

#261

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Men tend to work themselves to death in much higher frequency than women. Women benefit from social fabric when they are at the bottom, even homeless women are housed (at unfixed address) while men really are on the street. I’m of the impression that we can’t reduce gaps without introducing the threat of social declassment of women when they fail.

Did it occur to you that a better alternative is to provide a safety net for both men and women, instead of taking the response "if i can't have it, you can't either"? Engaging in a race to the bottom, ensuring everybody is equally bad off, is maybe not the best strategy to ensure equal treatment. (yes, it works. It's just not very productive)

Yes. What if neither is possible?

- People do not want to provide this safety net for men,

- People psychologically resist to remove it from women.

Equality is not possible.

Re: Swedish study finds discrimination against men in female-dominated occupations

#262

I mean it was obvious, but scientific study confirming things "everybody knows" is science in the purest and truest sense.

It's nonetheless useful to have rigorous evidence to justify what 'everyone knows' because inevitably, some people will vigorously assert the opposite regardless of how obvious it is.

Re: Swedish study finds discrimination against men in female-dominated occupations

#263

Humans gonna human. No one group is particularly more righteous, as much as the recent zeitgeist wants to lull us into this belief. Many people even believe that countries would be better off if mostly women ran it. Well, all you’d have is a bunch of corrupt women instead of a bunch of corrupt men.

Well, that's not what the study says. It says - or seems to say - that women discriminate against men but not vice versa.

Re: Swedish study finds discrimination against men in female-dominated occupations

#264
post #47
post #42

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Then please argue with those people when and where you encounter them.

I will. I predict we will see it in the comments here - likely throwaway amounts. That is why I was calling for a sense of perspective in advance.

Now that this thread has fallen off the front page, and there are no more comments, we can see that you did not answer any commenters here. Either you never planned to do this, and just wanted to stir up trouble, or you were wrong about there being such comments, either from throwaways or not.

Re: Swedish study finds discrimination against men in female-dominated occupations

#265
post #264
post #47

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I will. I predict we will see it in the comments here - likely throwaway amounts. That is why I was calling for a sense of perspective in advance.

Now that this thread has fallen off the front page, and there are no more comments, we can see that you did not answer any commenters here. Either you never planned to do this, and just wanted to stir up trouble, or you were wrong about there being such comments, either from throwaways or not.

I intended to. I didn't. Life gets in the way. I think my larger point remains true.

There are a lot more people arguing that men suffer almost equally in discrimination or women have it better, then I had expected.

All of them by men.

Re: Swedish study finds discrimination against men in female-dominated occupations

#266
post #260

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I've not been able to wrap my head around this issue. What is the thinking behind the desire to even sex ratios in various profession? Why are some professions receiving more attention than others when it comes to evening sex ratios. Is a perfect world when every construction site, hospital, and dreary programming job (lets be honest most of them aren't fun) has an even mix of the sexes? What is the benefit? Can some…

Because diversity is productive. If your constituents are similar with similar backgrounds, upbringing, sex etc, they will tend to have similar ideas, biases etc and that will lead to groupthink. In other words, they will be more likely to get stuck in a local minimum. Diversity in general is good because you'll get different ideas into the mix and will be more likely to be able to envision and explore different poss…

Has this been proven? If so based upon what specific factors? "Background" and "upbringing" encompass a multitude of meanings. I also have not personally ever seen a job ad for "Data Scientist with rural WV / trailer park upbringing" yet that cohort is likely to have a near zero representation. I have seen things offered by "race" and sex. Race seems to be determined by melanin level and self identification, not DNA sequencing.

Re: Swedish study finds discrimination against men in female-dominated occupations

#267

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I've not been able to wrap my head around this issue. What is the thinking behind the desire to even sex ratios in various profession? Why are some professions receiving more attention than others when it comes to evening sex ratios. Is a perfect world when every construction site, hospital, and dreary programming job (lets be honest most of them aren't fun) has an even mix of the sexes? What is the benefit? Can some…

> I don't want my daughters sucked into dangerous oil field work prone to boom and bust cycles. Are you implying that it is ok for your sons to be in such a field? To answer your question though... To establish a baseline, women get paid, as a whole, less than men for a particular job title (women doctor paid less than male doctor, women electrician paid less than male electrician). This is on a statistical basis whe…

> Are you implying that it is ok for your sons to be in such a field?

I only have daughters.

Re: Swedish study finds discrimination against men in female-dominated occupations

#268
post #264

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Now that this thread has fallen off the front page, and there are no more comments, we can see that you did not answer any commenters here. Either you never planned to do this, and just wanted to stir up trouble, or you were wrong about there being such comments, either from throwaways or not.

I intended to. I didn't. Life gets in the way. I think my larger point remains true. There are a lot more people arguing that men suffer almost equally in discrimination or women have it better, then I had expected. All of them by men.

How do you know the gender of people here? Or are you, again, talking about people who are not here?

Re: Swedish study finds discrimination against men in female-dominated occupations

#269

Earlier quoted context omitted.

This may not be the case in Europe. Sw engineer profession is roughly as male dominated, but I think you'll need a msc/PhD level in EU and with that kind of diploma IT pays vastly less than in US.

This has always struck me as strange. Software is surely one of the most easily exported commodities, so surely Europeans can easily play in the same global software market as Americans and moreover, I’m of the impression that software engineers in Europe are largely unionized so one would think they’d be able to bargain more effectively for better salaries.

For Finland. Even if they are unionized, the unions only set the minimum rates and very reasonably inflation raises. Ofc, there is some perks negotiated, but these really aren't too major things.

With IT the actual wages are much higher than union rates, and employers will have hard time to find anyone outside fresh graduates at those rates.

And this system has broken down this year, so things might go different.

Re: Swedish study finds discrimination against men in female-dominated occupations

#270
post #194

Earlier quoted context omitted.

There are some extreme but isolated examples of people who are disposed to this opinion, but more commonly the objection to fields being dominated by one gender or the other is because those workplaces, as this study points out, can't seem to stop themselves from discriminating and gatekeeping against those of the other gender. While it should in theory be no problem that a workplace is 90% men and 10% women because…

> While it should in theory be no problem that a workplace is 90% men and 10% women because they live in a platonic ideal where they've been free to attain to their true ambition that is influenced by biological traits related to sex, in reality, once one gender gains enough dominance in a field or workplace, sexual discrimination, harassment, and gatekeeping end up deepening the imbalance. The assumption that an ind…

Why focusing on hiring?

The comment you're answering to is talking about harassment and gatekeeping.

Hiring is one gate, but if you're hired just to reach gender goals or to satisfy the lust of your new manager, you will not have the same experience at the company than someone from the other gender. Like getting raises or being promoted.

Things are complicated.

Post reply on HN