TheNFTbay.org – The Billion Dollar Torrent (All NFT's from Ethereum and Solana)

Post by gitfan86 » Thu, Nov 18, 2021, 2:04 PM UTC

etothepii wrote: post #13

theshadowknows wrote: post #11

I used to come onto HN and see crypto-coin news and I'd jump into the comments and ask something along the lines of "But isn't bitcoin and all the other things like it just a giant scam?" and someone who believed in Bitcoin to be a transformative technology would jump in and explain the real potential. I personally still think it's sort of a scam, but I'm happy for all of the people who used it to get rich....so, alo…

The tried and tested answer is to think about "buying" the Mona Lisa. If the Louvre offered the opportunity for someone to be called the owner of the Mona Lisa but they could never take it out of the Louvre or any way control it what would that sell for? I suspect many, many millions of dollars.

Post by notkaiho » Thu, Nov 18, 2021, 2:05 PM UTC

chrisco255 wrote: post #15

theshadowknows wrote: post #11

I used to come onto HN and see crypto-coin news and I'd jump into the comments and ask something along the lines of "But isn't bitcoin and all the other things like it just a giant scam?" and someone who believed in Bitcoin to be a transformative technology would jump in and explain the real potential. I personally still think it's sort of a scam, but I'm happy for all of the people who used it to get rich....so, alo…

Yes, you can screenshot the Mona Lisa or print out a signed Mickey Mantle rookie card, but it's not the same thing is it? The verifiable timestamp and record of account associated with a wallet address (public key) that is known to be associated with the artist that produced the work is the same as establishing physical provenance for a unique item. And as for value goes, NFTs are far more liquid than physical art wo…

Post by fooyc » Thu, Nov 18, 2021, 2:05 PM UTC

rvz wrote: post #6

The images are not even stored on the blockchain. So you are basically purchasing a very expensive receipt for something that you do not even 'own' and the images are sitting on a server somewhere. This is definitive proof that these sort of NFTs based on images, videos, etc are a complete and gigantic scam ready to collapse. QED.

Post by [deleted] » Thu, Nov 18, 2021, 2:07 PM UTC

ohgodplsno wrote: post #35

ahelwer wrote: post #26

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I think I can explain. I understand why others value them, although I don't agree with the valuation (as a litmus test, I also think shelling out $30k for a genuine Rolex is very stupid). My lack of agreement also does not prevent me from participating and profiting off the people who think they do have value, although I have not done so. There are basically two theories of their value: the collectible theory and the…

>they never degrade on the blockchain That's entirely wrong. None of the NFTs are stored on the blockchain, merely a bit of JSON that contains a link to your image. If you're lucky, it's hosted on IPFS (and it'll disappear whenever everyone stops seeding it). Otherwise, it's just a link to your image host of choice, and the author is free to replace it with the image of a dick in three months, deleting all your resal…

Post by baseballMan » Thu, Nov 18, 2021, 2:07 PM UTC

cr1895 wrote: post #24

chrisco255 wrote: post #15

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Yes, you can screenshot the Mona Lisa or print out a signed Mickey Mantle rookie card, but it's not the same thing is it? The verifiable timestamp and record of account associated with a wallet address (public key) that is known to be associated with the artist that produced the work is the same as establishing physical provenance for a unique item. And as for value goes, NFTs are far more liquid than physical art wo…

> Yes, you can screenshot the Mona Lisa or print out a signed Mickey Mantle rookie card, but it's not the same thing is it? Obviously not, because those are tangible things. That’s not a valid comparison.