Earlier quoted context omitted.
You should watch last weekend's episode of Last Week Tonight: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=liptMbjF3EE
No thank you. He is the tucker carlson of the left. I try to stay away from talking heads that remove all nuance from the debate.
That is quite an interesting claim. Do you mean because they are leading voices on their supposed political side, or they are equivalent in factual accuracy, or something else?
My favorite factoid about Tucker Carson, the leading voice of news analysis in the USA:
> Now comes the claim that you can't expect to literally believe the words that come out of Carlson's mouth. And that assertion is not coming from Carlson's critics. It's being made by a federal judge in the Southern District of New York and by Fox News's own lawyers in defending Carlson against accusations of slander. It worked, by the way. [0]
I am up to this point unaware of anything clearly nonfactual presented by Oliver. If anything from Oliver exists along the lines of Carlson's extraordinary list of lies [1] I would genuinely be interested to learn about it.
I wrote a lot there, but my main question is, how exactly do you see Carlson and Oliver as equivalent?
[0] https://www.npr.org/2020/09/29/917747123/you-literally-cant-...
[1] https://www.politifact.com/factchecks/list/?speaker=tucker-c...