Live data from Hacker News

Truck driver leads NJ Senate president after spending $153 on campaign

nbcphiladelphia.com

291–300 of 459 posts

Re: Truck driver leads NJ Senate president after spending $153 on campaign

#291
post #264
post #9

Here's his campaign ad. https://twitter.com/kerpen/status/1455899165230354448?s=20 South Jersey obviously isn't very happy with New Jersey's leadership.

You got that from a campaign ad? Wow, you’re easily swayed.

He's probably getting it from the fact that yesterday the people in South Jersey voted out the 16 year incumbent who led the State Senate.

Re: Truck driver leads NJ Senate president after spending $153 on campaign

#292
post #256

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The vast majority of elected offices in the United States are unpaid.

Given many are at the municipal and school board level I suppose that’s true, but they are barely “politicians”. For example Palo Alto has professional management and then an unpaid city council (they take turns being mayor). There are no political parties. How well does this work? It’s a mixed bag. The professional managers get things done but managed to build a little empire (lots of middle management) which is now…

weird: we have a very similar setup in my little corner of England and I have similar feelings. The "executive" professionals can run amok, awarding dubious contracts to friends and spending millions of taxpayer money in quixotic schemes, with little or no accountability; meanwhile, elected councillors are counting potholes. The electorate is so divided that there has been no clear majority for 5-6 years, which probably weakens political oversight even more. Coming from a more "roman-napoleonic" country, all this seems silly and wide-open to all sorts of corruption.

Re: Truck driver leads NJ Senate president after spending $153 on campaign

#293
post #20
post #2

Any (relatively) unbiased sources that explain how NJ got into this predicament? Just current leadership being out of touch with the wants/needs of NJ citizens?

> how NJ got into this predicament? Possibly due to attitudes like describing an average citizen beating a career politician as “a predicament”

It's not that he's an "average citizen" that's objectionable, it's that, based on quotes posted in other sub-threads and the campaign video that someone posted, he ran on an anti-mask, anti-lockdown, COVID-downplaying platform and won. The question is how did NJ get into this predicament where people with these views are winning elections? I can see this happening in Mississippi or something, but New Jersey?

Re: Truck driver leads NJ Senate president after spending $153 on campaign

#294
post #109

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It's so bonkers. America has the most unfettered gun ownership laws in the developed world by a mile and somehow it's still a political wedge that can outweigh healthcare, fair taxation, education.

Show me someone who is for healthcare, unions, college, but also doesn't want to take a black marker to the second amendment, I'll wait. Until the left stops going after guns, single issue voters will keep voting the way they do.

Well I'm right here, but I don't know how to run for office and I probably would get crucified for entirely unrelated opinions (which I would be willing to change if given adequate reason). Probably a lot of people like me (and I assume you?) out there. We just aren't on the ballot, even if sometimes we might be entirely qualified.

Re: Truck driver leads NJ Senate president after spending $153 on campaign

#295
post #41

Earlier quoted context omitted.

[flagged]

You mentioned statistics in another comment of yours, just slightly above this one. Can you show me statistics regarding this "real and obvious risk of psychological and social harm" of children wearing masks?

No, I don't need statistics to understand covering the faces of young children for extended periods is going to harm their social development. Do you disagree that social cues are important, and come from facial expressions? Do you need a study for this? I sure don't. I guess we'll have to see which children have stronger development going forward.. masked or unmasked schools. It's a risk I certainly wouldn't take with my own kids.

Re: Truck driver leads NJ Senate president after spending $153 on campaign

#296
post #41

Earlier quoted context omitted.

[flagged]

Why do people forget that it’s not just that children are mostly safe. Sure that may be true…but they carry that home to family who absolutely are at risk. That is why it’s a useful mitigation. Why do people forget that an infectious disease doesn’t stick to just one person? Do they not get what infectious means?

Then you are sacrificing the well being of children, and their social development, for some perceived (likely minor) benefit to decreasing spread to older family members. But it worse, because Covid is becoming endemic. It's a coronavirus. It is never going away. We are going to have Covid infections forever. So what has been gained?

It would be much more beneficial to encourage weight loss and fitness regime for overweight people. The vast majority of deaths have occurred from overweight comorbidities. But this has never been widely addressed as a tactic to decrease severe cases.

Re: Truck driver leads NJ Senate president after spending $153 on campaign

#297

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Gun control is over in Virginia at least. The Lt. Governor's election campaign was her at a gun range. And Governor Youngkin is also pro-2A. When 25.8% of the shootings are coming from Chicago which has just 0.8% population, maybe it's time to focus on gangs instead of making life miserable for legal gun owners.

When 15% of world gun deaths are coming from the USA which has just 4.25% of the world population, perhaps it's time to focus on national level issues instead of using excuses.

Assuming those stats are both correct, it seems like an unusually high portion of global gun deaths per capita still come from Chicago, so maybe start at the smaller level.

Re: Truck driver leads NJ Senate president after spending $153 on campaign

#298

Earlier quoted context omitted.

From one white man to another white man: you're not being attacked, democrats aren't anti-white (have you looked at the leadership? very white indeed!), and you are still living in the system that our white ancestors made for us. Other people not being oppressed as much doesn't mean your liberties are at risk. It's OK to teach and learn about how racist people made racist systems. You don't need to feel guilty, unles…

This race has proven that it doesn't actually matter whether or not white people are being attacked (they're not) or whether CRT is even being taught in schools (it's not). Republicans effectively created a media moral panic around "Critical Race Theory" and it paid off for them in spades.

It doesnt help that democrats paint anyone who finds this stuff obnoxious as republicans- they are alienating the largest constituent in America- independents.

Re: Truck driver leads NJ Senate president after spending $153 on campaign

#299

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Gun control is over in Virginia at least. The Lt. Governor's election campaign was her at a gun range. And Governor Youngkin is also pro-2A. When 25.8% of the shootings are coming from Chicago which has just 0.8% population, maybe it's time to focus on gangs instead of making life miserable for legal gun owners.

Democrats still control the senate in virginia so I'm not sure gun control is over. Biased because I live in Chicago, but it's legitimately impossible to stop gangs as long as it's possible to get a gun. As soon as someone is arrested there are 5 kids ready to take their place. The only solutions to gun violence here are end poverty or stop guns from out of state from entering the city.

I still cannot really fathom this logic. Why would you not want to address WHY guns are used?
Post reply on HN